I'm in favor of the next Dem president - asking no questions and start bombing El Salvador

[Nimble_Idea]

for aiding the kidnapping of US persons.

I wonder if this zukerberg wannabe UFC dictator homeboy is keeping that in mind.

going to be an interesting primary between those who choose to fight, or be more like themz.

[Attilatheblond]

1. My preference is 'wet boys' to take out corrupt leaders. No point ruining regular people's lives

[kerry-is-my-prez]

17. Get real! Trumps plans on "running" for a 3rd term. And it will be fixed.

The last election was very questionable. It looks like Trump didn’t win but managed to get in.

[Attilatheblond]

19. Wasn't referring to him

[Scrivener7]

2. I'm in favor of the next Democratic president restoring some order and not

picking ridiculous and deadly fights for no reason.

We hired them to do this. We can un-hire them. Mump could get Garcia home tomorrow if he chose. There's no need whatsoever for bombs, and you're talking about one creep of a president and a lot of innocent Salvadoreans.

[Nimble_Idea]

3. I'll give them hours to comply. if not, hell will rain. simple shish.

But I'm not in favor of any dem taking that off the table. Andrew Tate II can choose the right path or pay the price.

[Scrivener7]

4. .

[Nimble_Idea]

8. You're right. I stand corrected. I too trust the dictator to do the right thing.

[Torchlight]

9. Somewhere between the extremes, lies the rational.

The either-or fallacy is a crutch.

[Scrivener7]

18. Said nobody ever.

[PatSeg]

7. I agree

The world is already on the verge of World War III. We need sanity and reason, not more American Cowboy diplomacy. We've already had enough of that kind of crap with both Bush and Trump.

[Nimble_Idea]

10. I have no idea what you are talking about. The TV says we are at peace in the world except that one place

where they started it. WWIII is a bit much.

[PatSeg]

16. I guess it depends on one's perspective

I see conflict all over the world with the possibility of far more to come. It reminds of the world prior to World War II.

[tavernier]

5. Not just NO.

HELL NO!

If your neighbor’s husband is a tyrant, will you bomb his house and kill his family?

I have friends in ES, good and kind people who suffer enough without our hatred adding to it.

[Nimble_Idea]

6. no, you're right. I would just bob my head and wag my fingers. tut tut and all.

I stand corrected.

[JI7]

11. The American President doesn't need to threaten to bomb in order to get

the prisoner back.

The reason we aren't getting him back is Trump doesn't want him back and making no attempts to do it.

[vanessa_ca]

12. JFC! What the everloving hell? -eom-

[0rganism]

13. "next Dem president"? While I disagree about bombing, I admire your optimism in the face of the fall of the republic

I do hope your expeditious enthusiasm contributes strongly to decisive actions in service of domestic resistance

[Nimble_Idea]

14. everything tomorrow is hypothetical. including the certain future.

[flvegan]

15. That escalated quickly. n/t

[Solly Mack]

20. Bomb El Salvador because their dictator is doing the bidding of America's dictator?

Why not just have some third country not involved with the actions of either dictator bomb America?

I mean, Bukele didn't grab up the men and fly them off to El Salvador, did he?

Bukele isn't the one bringing harm to the people of America with his actions, is he?

Sure, he is no better than Trump but why not focus on America's little tyrant?

Had Trump said Kilmar Abrego Garcia must be brought back, Bukele wouldn't stand in the way of America flying in and picking him up to return to America.

Bukele took his cues from what Trump wanted.

Why bomb another country for the actions of the American government?

Why place all the blame on El Salvador?

Why jump to bombing a country at all?

What if another country felt the exact same way about America over the treatment of their citizens that have traveled to America?

[mahina]

21. NO