Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(63,115 posts)
Thu Apr 17, 2025, 09:43 AM Apr 2025

Asha Rangappa: What's the Real Quid Pro Quo with Bukele?

https://asharangappa.substack.com/p/whats-the-real-quid-pro-quo-with

-snip-

There are two possibilities. The first is political. El Salvador has suffered from gang violence, led by Mara Salvatrucha, or MS-13, following decades of civil war from 1979 to 1992. According to an indictment brought by the Eastern District of New York against thirteen MS-13 gang members in 2022, various El Salvadoran administrations since the war ended entered into a “truce” with MS-13, in which the gang agreed to reduce homicides in the city “in exchange for transfers to less secure prisons, improved prison conditions, conjugal visits, cash payments, and other benefits and privileges.” The “truce” came to a halt, however, in 2015 after the U.S. government, which wanted to curb MS-13’s activity in the United States and bring them to justice here, increased pressure on El Salvador to return to restrictive prison conditions for gang members and extradite some of them to the U.S. In retaliation for the “truce” being lifted, MS-13 increased its violence both in El Salvador and in the U.S. In fact, the first Trump Justice Department created a task force, called Task Force Vulcan, to crack down on MS-13 in the U.S. – which is what led to the federal indictment noted earlier.

Enter Bukele. Bukele was elected in 2021, winning on a platform that promised to (once again) “crack down” on gang violence. But his party, Nuevas Ideas, did so with the support of a critical group: Yep, MS-13. Prior to the election, Bukele and his party negotiated with the gang to bring back the “truce,” which would include (according to the federal indictment) “financial benefits, control of territory, the ability to run the gang from prison, and the early release of gang members.” MS-13 also wanted assurance that they wouldn’t be extradited to the U.S., where they would face more punitive measures. (Having studied the drug cartels in Colombia, this was reminiscent of Pablo Escobar’s mantra, “Mejor una tumba en Colombia, que una carcel in los Estados Unidos” – which means, “Better a grave in Colombia than a jail cell in the United States.”) The same day he took office, Bukele removed the Attorney General and five members of the Supreme Court who had been working with the U.S. to take real action against MS-13. He also released a major MS-13 leader whom the U.S. was seeking for extradition from prison.

In exchange, MS-13 “agreed to reduce the number of public murders in El Salvador, which politically benefitted the government, by creating the perception that the government was reducing the murder rate.” Indeed, Bukele’s popularity is the result of his so-called “Territorial Control Plan,” which involved building his supermax prison and his plan of mass incarceration – a plan which he credits for the drop in violence since he took office. Of course, the citizens of El Salvador aren’t privy to the secret negotiations Bukele made with MS-13 – details that were going to be made public when the U.S. government’s case against the MS-13 defendants went to trial. Which may explain why the Trump administration quietly dropped these charges last week and put the charged MS-13 members on the third plane bound for El Slavador (and which included Abrego Garcia). Among the defendants was one of the highest-ranking leaders of MS-13, Cesar Humberto Lopez-Larios, who was arrested last June and added to the earlier indictment (and who almost certainly will not face real punishment in El Salvador). A former FBI agent who spent years working on this and other gang cases called it “a historical loss,” especially in terms of getting critical intelligence about MS-13’s operations and members in the United States.

-snip-

As I mentioned, that could be just one reason the Trump administration doesn’t want to reveal the details. The other reason is that the deal as written simply undercuts the Trump administration’s legal claim that it can’t do anything to secure Abrego Garcia’s return. The AP has quoted internal memos from El Salvador’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which states that the country will “house these individuals for one (1) year, pending the United States’ decision on their long term disposition.” Meaning that the U.S., not El Salvador, is in control of what happens to the people sent there – undercutting recent claims made in court by the Justice Department that they are being held under the “domestic, sovereign authority” of El Salvador.

-snip-
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Asha Rangappa: What's the Real Quid Pro Quo with Bukele? (Original Post) highplainsdem Apr 2025 OP
Asha Rangappa: Re-litigating a judge's determination based on old evidence on TV isn't due process Dennis Donovan Apr 2025 #1
Great reporting, entire article is a must read at the link sop Apr 2025 #2
The Vice-President told Van Hollen Trump ordered Garcia held Blue Full Moon Apr 2025 #3
A facade. Naturally. Solly Mack Apr 2025 #4
Holy shit. 58Sunliner Apr 2025 #5
Way, way recommended. H2O Man Apr 2025 #6
Drag the fuckers into the light orangecrush Apr 2025 #7
Wow Pinback Apr 2025 #8
Kick for greater exposure. Efilroft Sul Apr 2025 #9
K&R UTUSN Apr 2025 #10
Kick dalton99a Apr 2025 #11

Dennis Donovan

(31,059 posts)
1. Asha Rangappa: Re-litigating a judge's determination based on old evidence on TV isn't due process
Thu Apr 17, 2025, 09:57 AM
Apr 2025
Asha Rangappa
‪@asharangappa.bsky.social‬
I don't know who needs to hear this, but if there is NEW evidence that would change a determination *already made by a judge*, the government needs to present it in that court and get the determination changed. Re-litigating a judge's determination based on old evidence on TV isn't due process
April 17, 2025 at 9:47 AM


I don't know who needs to hear this, but if there is NEW evidence that would change a determination *already made by a judge*, the government needs to present it in that court and get the determination changed. Re-litigating a judge's determination based on old evidence on TV isn't due process

Asha Rangappa (@asharangappa.bsky.social) 2025-04-17T13:47:58.177Z

sop

(19,352 posts)
2. Great reporting, entire article is a must read at the link
Thu Apr 17, 2025, 09:58 AM
Apr 2025

This Trump-Bukele deal reminds me of Reagan's top secret NSDD-17 directive (National Security Decision Directive 17) giving the CIA authority to recruit and support the Nicaraguan Contras.

H2O Man

(79,258 posts)
6. Way, way recommended.
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 05:35 PM
Apr 2025

The of the most intelligent and capable communicators of this era. I have the greatest of respect for her.

Pinback

(13,660 posts)
8. Wow
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 09:01 PM
Apr 2025

So an International crime syndicate is running the show. This all makes a lot more sense with this brilliant reporting and analysis.

I hope Ms. Rangappa has good security.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Asha Rangappa: What's the...