General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew AI app designed specifically for cheating - "So, start cheating. Because when everyone does, no one is."
The app was created by two Columbia students suspended for cheating. They've already raised several million.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/this-ai-tool-helps-you-cheat-on-job-interviews-sales-calls-exams
Called Cluely, the tool launches an in-browser window that produces AI-generated responses to any questions. According to the company website, it's "a completely undetectable desktop assistant that sees your screen and hears your audio." Even if the interviewer asks you to share your screen, they won't be able to see the translucent Cluely window visible to you.
While a standard version with limited features is available for free, the pro version with more powerful AI models costs $20 monthly or $100 annually.
-snip-
In a series of posts on X, Lee shared the suspension letter he received from the college, along with another letter from an Amazon executive. Per the letters, Lee had appeared in an interview for an Amazon SDE intern role, aced it, and received an offer. Later on, however, the Amazon exec found out about Lee's cheating tool via his YouTube video and reported him to Columbia. Lee had also received offers from Meta, TikTok, and Capital One.
-snip-
The section of the thread title in quotes is what's in the last two lines of these cheaters' "manifesto" - https://cluely.com/manifesto - which they probably had AI write for them. Earlier excerpts from the manifesto:
It sees your screen. Hears your audio.
Feeds you answers in real time.
While others guess you're already right.
when a model can do it in seconds?
I first heard about this app when I saw a post from science fiction writer John Scalzi commenting on what humor writer Dan Sheehan - https://dansheehan.co/ - had said :
Anyone who internalizes this line of bullshit will absolutely always be outflanked by people who know how to actually do things
— John Scalzi (@scalzi.com) 2025-04-23T00:45:48.446Z
I agree with both what Sheehan wrote - that these cheaters' manifesto "feels like an advertisement for spiritual death" - and what Scalzi wrote about the mainfesto: "Anyone who internalizes this line of bullshit will absolutely always be outflanked by people who know how to actually do things."
Of course, cheating as an objective has always been the appeal of generative AI to many of its users.
Instant (fake) talent.
Instant (fake) knowledge.
Instant (fake) work and creativity.
Fraud.
These cheating former college students are just more open about that than most AI users are.
And they deserve the biggest F the business world can give them for trying to market their cheating app.
0rganism
(25,715 posts)This is just the kind of attitude F47 likes to see in his minions. They'll fit right in.
highplainsdem
(63,106 posts)Coventina
(29,938 posts)SheltieLover
(81,719 posts)Coventina
(29,938 posts)My discipline is now a dinosaur.
I just want to live out the rest of my days in peace and solitude.
*sigh*
SheltieLover
(81,719 posts)Lovie777
(23,741 posts)gun fight mob style.
Volaris
(11,796 posts)'When everyone's Super, NO ONE WILL BE!'
It's as ethically, laughably stupid IRL as it was in the cartoon.
SheltieLover
(81,719 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.