General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS Justice Department announces plans to revoke critical protections for journalists
Strong protections for journalists serve the American public by safeguarding the free flow of information."
By Reporters Committee Posted on April 25, 2025
Today, the U.S. Department of Justice released a memo from Attorney General Pam Bondi directing the agency to rescind the current version of the news media guidelines, and publish a new policy. The guidelines, which have been in place since the Nixon administration, detail how and under what circumstances federal prosecutors can issue subpoenas, court orders, or search warrants for journalists testimony, work product, or other records.
The guidelines were most recently updated in 2022 and expressly prohibited the Justice Department from using subpoenas or other investigative tools against journalists who possess and publish classified information obtained in newsgathering, with only narrow exceptions.
Responding to the announcement, Reporters Committee President Bruce D. Brown made the following statement:
We have seen this announcement, but we havent seen the language of the new policy.
Some of the most consequential reporting in U.S. history from Watergate to warrantless wiretapping after 9/11 was and continues to be made possible because reporters have been able to protect the identities of confidential sources and uncover and report stories that matter to people across the political spectrum.
Strong protections for journalists serve the American public by safeguarding the free flow of information.
Well wait to see what the policy looks like, but we know reporters will still do their jobs, and there is no shortage of legal support to back them up.
/snip
Irish_Dem
(82,386 posts)Bondage Barbie hates the First Amendment, and loathes a free press.
Bondage Barbie wears a black leather tank top and short shorts.
Cracks her genuine leather whip at reporters.
Bondage Barbie will tell reporters what to print and not print.
BOSSHOG
(44,738 posts)If I didnt want journalists reporting what I did Id do the same thing Pam. You should be disbarred and apologize to Stetson.
Irish_Dem
(82,386 posts)She is taking every single thing she learned in law school and doing the opposite.
sakabatou
(46,344 posts)TearsOfDaClowned
(59 posts)orangecrush
(31,182 posts)See ya
Dennis Donovan
(31,059 posts)@wyden.senate.gov
I have a bipartisan bill that would make these protections ironclad. It passed the House unanimously (twice) and it was never taken up in the Senate. Now Trump is laying the groundwork to lock up reporters who don't rat out their sources who expose crimes by his administration.
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
1h
BREAKING: A.G. Bondi reverses Garland policy against subpoenaing journalists.
Stating that leaks "undermine President Trumps policies," Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that "the news media must answer subpoenas when authorized."
Today, at Law Dork >
April 25, 2025 at 6:33 PM
I have a bipartisan bill that would make these protections ironclad. It passed the House unanimously (twice) and it was never taken up in the Senate. Now Trump is laying the groundwork to lock up reporters who don't rat out their sources who expose crimes by his administration.
— Senator Ron Wyden (@wyden.senate.gov) 2025-04-25T22:33:09.551Z
FloridaBlues
(4,687 posts)spanone
(142,065 posts)PortTack
(35,824 posts)ancianita
(43,365 posts)WASHINGTON, July 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland formalized a new policy on Monday that broadly prohibits prosecutors from subpoenaing reporters' phone and email records, an abrupt shift after the Trump administration secretly seized records from several major news outlets in an effort to root out leaks.
In addition to the new policy, Garland reiterated that the Justice Department would also throw its support behind new media-shield legislation to make the policy permanent...
The Justice Department last month held meetings with media executives to discuss formulating a new policy. The meetings came after several media companies - including the New York Times, CNN and the Washington Post- revealed that their reporters' records had been seized during Republican President Donald Trump's presidency in an effort to identify their confidential sources for national security stories...
... the policy makes it clear that prosecutors cannot subpoena a reporter's records merely because the reporter possesses or publishes classified information.
The protections also do not extend in cases where a person or entity is an agent of a foreign government, a member of a terrorist organization or if a person's life is in "imminent risk of death or serious bodily harm."
In a joint statement, the presidents of the Washington-based National Press Club and its nonprofit affiliate, the National Press Club Journalism Institute, lauded the memo and said it strikes the right balance between protecting reporters while also protecting classified information.
"We are grateful the attorney general has at long last squared Justice Department policy with the First Amendment," said Lisa Nicole Matthews and Angela Greiling Keane ... Matthews and Keane added that the "broad and ongoing benefit" of allowing journalists to be allowed to expose facts the government might prefer to keep under wraps "outweighs the governments interest in clamping down on any particular leak."
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat, on Monday said in a statement that he felt "encouraged" by the memo, and supports legislation "to make certain that these changes are codified and remain the policy of the Department for years to come."
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-attorney-general-issues-broad-ban-against-seizing-media-records-2021-07-19/
Solly Mack
(97,272 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.
