General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI wish women in the U.S. automatically kept their last names when they marry
It's close to impossible to locate women friends from school or childhood, because marriage annihilates their name. The dissolving of the woman's name upon marriage is encouraged and associated as somehow being a romantic act.
Men can be located easily because they change nothing when they get married. They remain themselves.
Easier in Europe, where everyone keeps their last name when they get married.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)but then again, I'm from Europe originally...
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)not really..
but I'm lazy, and its just too cumbersome to change everything..
no_hypocrisy
(46,094 posts)surnames (I refuse to call them "maiden names" or at worst, hypenated surnames when they married. I'm surprised to see a majority of younger women automatically changing their names with Mrs.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Peregrine Took
(7,413 posts)To my way of thinking today's "girls" are a very disappointing bunch.
Very much into turning themselves into pretzels to please men. I thought it was going to be different for the generation following mine.
I live in a trendy neighborhood and as soon as a new fashion comes out they are all wearing it along with the long, long hair, the spray tans and the latest of the latest jogging outfits.
The mani pedi places are packed all the time it seems.
Even taking the el downtown to work they're in heels.
We always wore our running shoes and sox while commuting and changed to dressy ones when we got to work.
All my nieces have immediately taken their husbands' names.
Back to the 50's if you ask me
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)to a great degree.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Skittles
(153,160 posts)nope
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Seedersandleechers
(3,044 posts)adopted and it didn't reflect who I was. And, I had to always spell it out. I loved the last name of my ex-husband and kept it even when I got married for a short time. My last name is a common first name so I never have to spell it out.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)But it is, and remains, a very personal choice.
I loathed my maiden name, and could not wait to take my husbands'. I am much happier now. And I am still me.
My one daughter kept hers on marrying, and my other daughter changed hers.
To each her own.
stockholmer
(3,751 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)classof56
(5,376 posts)Didn't much like my maiden name, really liked my husband's name (still have both after 45 years), and seemed to make things less complicated, IMHO, for our two daughters to have same last name as both parents'. The first one kept hers/ours when she married, didn't have kids so not an issue there. Second one has been married twice, first to her kids' father, but chose to change her surname both times.
As for my name change--like you, I'm still me, except I like to think I've made some improvements through the years, which really had nothing to do with my name. Moving forward--that's the name of the game!
Blessings.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)October
(3,363 posts)Honestly -- it is a personal choice.
I, for one, cannot stand being told what is acceptable -- by male or female!
In my personal (!) case, my father abandoned the family. No child support, no visitations, no holidays, birthdays, nothing. And there I was -- STUCK with his awful last name for years -- with no connection to him or his family. Every time I heard it I was reminded of his absence. Not to mention, that it was a difficult name in and of itself.
So, when I married a loving man -- who supported my dreams, is a feminist, is my best friend... YES, I gladly share his name.
I'm as tired of females telling me what shoes or hair style to wear, or whether I should or shouldn't use make-up! Sorry, but I do as I like. Billy Jean King, Marlo Thomas, and Glroia Steinum do as they like too -- and they all seem to wear make-up, dye their hair and whatnot.
PLEASE!
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)How good that you married such a good man...
And I agree with everything you've said here!
October
(3,363 posts)I appreciate it very much.
MissB
(15,807 posts)Mine was THE worst ever.
However, I did hyphenate for about a year and that was probably worse than just keeping it. It didn't sound right (the combo was awful) and I did like dh's last name better.
My oldest brother changed his last name in college, before he went off to flight school (US Navy). He didn't want to be Lieutenant (really crappy maiden name).
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)My mother understands. But her maiden name was even worse.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)contrary to popular belief it isnt some new femenist invention. ive bee through many british graveyards and seen may tombstones (several hundred years old) in where husband and wife were bured side by side - the wives took their husbands names but kept theirs too - as in Elizabeth Jones Smith.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)change.
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)I have probably over 100 women for whom their original family name is lost to me. Sometimes one has to find a marriage record (no easy task) or an obit for a relative of a woman to find her maiden name. At least we have gotten away from a REALLY disgusting tendency in American culture, where a woman becomes Mrs Husband. I think that trend was really disgusting. Mrs John Smith, Mrs Bob Johnson or whatever. The woman is nothing but an extension of her husband, no personality of her own when she is called this. The fact that it makes genealogy hard is just annoying. The fact that she is socially downgraded so far that she doesn't even have a first name is disgusting.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Please be specific, because I can name specific places where that's not true. And since you said "everyone" you are clearly wrong.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Lagarde née Lallouette
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)France
Since the 1789 Revolution, the law stipulates that "no one may use another name than that given on his birth certificate";[23] furthermore, the 1946 revision to the Constitution guarantees that "women and men have equal rights", including in the use of their birth name. Upon getting married, a woman keeps her maiden name (nom de jeune fille). She may, under her maiden name, for example, open a bank account, sign cheques, obtain a passport, etc. However, marriage grants a married person the right to assume his or her spouse's last name. It is still a common practice for a woman to use her husband's name in this way, despite the fact that no official due process formalizes this usage. The majority of married women use their husband's name for all documents, official or not. The article 264 of the French civil code does, however, stipulate that "upon divorcing both spouses lose the right to use each other's name".
A married person who wishes to formally append a spouse's name to his or her birth name may do so through a simple administrative procedure. In recent years, this trend has gained popularity, especially among upper class women and among women who received a university diploma (MD, PhD) under their maiden name. For example, President Nicolas Sarkozy's wife is called Madame Bruni-Sarkozy, in which "Bruni" is her birth name and "Sarkozy" her husband's name. Some husbands append their wife's last name to their birth name, although this remains rare.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)so clearly the Wikipedia article has misled you.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Karin Andreu (her mom's name) Martinez (her father's name) of Ibarruri (my father's name). But she almost never was forced to do that. I know for a fact it happened once when there was some official invitation in which my father was the primary person invited, so as to 'connect' her with him as an invitee, but not as a daughter.
Otherwise, she's Karin Andreu Martinez, her own name and identity.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)whereas Lagarde does, definitively, disprove it.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)Some French women are known by their husband's surname. We can see that. Lagarde is an example. You don't get to ignore the facts.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)"However, marriage grants a married person the right to assume his or her spouse's last name. It is still a common practice for a woman to use her husband's name in this way, despite the fact that no official due process formalizes this usage. The majority of married women use their husband's name for all documents, official or not."
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)In fact, we have a 1995 survey saying 91% of French women took their husband's surname (on its own, not using both together): http://www.ined.fr/fichier/t_publication/68/publi_pdf2_pop_and_soc_english_367.pdf
The other figures for the countries mentioned are: Italy - 64% use both surnames; Spain - 77% use their own original surname.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)"However, marriage grants a married person the right to assume his or her spouse's last name. It is still a common practice for a woman to use her husband's name in this way, despite the fact that no official due process formalizes this usage. The majority of married women use their husband's name for all documents, official or not."
I know a lot of French women who have the same name as husband, some don't, just like in the USA. Also, just like in the USA, " marriage grants a married person the right to assume his or her spouse's last name. It is still a common practice for a woman to use her husband's name in this way, despite the fact that no official due process formalizes this usage. The majority of married women use their husband's name for all documents, official or not."
And, like in the USA, you can formally file for a name change.
As far as "equal rights", also like many other places, that means legally, not necessarily socially or otherwise.
ProfessorGAC
(65,010 posts)The marriage certificates of both sides of our family show the names of both people as the same. My dad's parents were married in Siracuse in 1921, and my mom's parents were married in panateria in 1917.
GAC
Kellerfeller
(397 posts)Just Kidding.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)And a note as an FYI: the legality-now tradition in the U.S. of a woman losing her name and taking on the name of THE GROOM'S FATHER'S NAME (as if both, the bride and groom were brother and sister), comes to us not from Italy, not from France, not from Spain, and not from any of the countries where Spanish is spoken, nor from myriad others, but from dear old ENGLAND, from a time when women were chattel.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)This one's kind of on the fence. I need to know in order to know who to be angry with.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)If women choose to change their names, that is fine.
If they choose not to change their names, that is also fine.
If men choose to change their names - in the UK, quite a lot of couples double-barrel - that is also fine.
Implying that women who choose to change their names are somehow doing something bad or wrong - or "destructive" - is just as silly as implying that women who choose not to are, and for exactly the same reasons.
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)The problem with double-barrelling is that powers of two grow quickly, with 8 hyphenated names after just 3 generations, and 16 the next. A great way to show your immediate ancestry, but you'd have to be an Ent to want to introduce yourself this way.
A wedding will be taking place between: Tarquin Fin-tim-lin-bin-whin-bim-lim-bus-stop-F'tang-F'tang-Olé-Biscuitbarrel and Malcolm Peter Brian Telescope Adrian Umbrella Stand Jasper Wednesday (pops mouth twice) Stoatgobbler John Raw Vegetable (whinnying) Arthur Norman Michael (blows squeaker) Featherstone Smith (whistle) Northgot Edwards Harris (fires pistol, then 'whoop') Mason (chuff-chuff-chuff-chuff) Frampton Jones Fruitbat (laughs) (squeaker) Gilbert (sings) 'We'll keep a welcome in the' (three shots) Williams If I Could Walk That Way Jenkin (squeaker) Tiger-drawers Pratt Thompson (sings) 'Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head' Darcy Carter (horn) Pussycat (sings) 'Don't Sleep In The Subway' Barton Mainwaring (hoot, 'whoop') Smith.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)they would be viewed as odd if they changed their last name to that of the bride's father's last name.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)A fair number of men in the UK double-barrel, but I've never heard of a man changing his name when the woman didn't.
But that is not relevant to whether or not it's wrong for a woman to do so.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)subservience of women, and that men would not settle for accepting the bride's father's last name as his own, the way women do with the groom's father's last name.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)I quite agree that it's a tradition that exists for bad reasons.
But just because other people once did something for bad reasons doesn't mean that doing it is a bad thing.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)In fact, it might be the most telling thing about why it's happening today.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)SwissTony
(2,560 posts)after he married his girlfriend Natalie Hunter. The Hunter-Pauls were married in England.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)SwissTony
(2,560 posts)I've long been a fan of the Paul brothers (there's Robbie and Henry) who besides being brilliant players have shown exceptional intelligence and modesty both on and off the field. Not at all the macho sterotype, but both very tough. And talented.
I'm Australian, and we Ozzies say about tough guys "I wouldn't want to pinch his beer". I'd buy the Paul brothers a beer (or a sarsparilla) anytime.
Edited because I don't know the difference between the words "Henry" and "Paul"
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)krawhitham
(4,644 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)JI7
(89,248 posts)names. but i guess this is more in recent years.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)My mother, grandmothers, etc, would lose their middle name, make their "maiden" name their new middle name, and then take the husband's last name. High school friends from back home usually use their full name on Facebook for that reason- so you can find them.
It made me always wonder why parents bothered giving their daughter a middle name in the first place, if they are going to lose it
a la izquierda
(11,794 posts)I borrowed that idea from my mother-in-law
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)This is very common in my mom's home country. I like it - if I only have space for one middle name on a form or something, that's the one I'll use.
If I ever got married, I wouldn't change my last name - been using it as a pro byline for too many years, and I like it, and that side of my family is dying out so I don't want to hasten the loss of the name.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)that my mom never had a middle name.
It was only when she got to her mid-late 60s that she got a Confirmation name (I think that's what it's called? She was brought up Catholic...I wasn't).
She wanted "Theresa" but chose "Mary" instead because it was easier for her to spell.
As for me, I've always detested my middle name...Evelyn.
Although I don't hate it so much if I pronounce it "Eev-linn" instead of "Ev-uh-linn".
davsand
(13,421 posts)I had a profesional identity that I did not want to give up when we married. I "lost" my middle name from birth and then made my family name (Davis) my new middle name.
This was nothing new in either family, however. My husband's middle name is Owen--which was his mom's "maiden" name. We had decided that if we had a boy he'd be called Owen Davis Sand____. Similarly, in my family, Earl has been used the same way.
Laura
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)women have careers they begin before marriage, and need their identity for them.
But in general, even women without careers should be able to maintain their own identity the way men do.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)I don't remember who had which name, but they combined their names into Villaraigosa. I'm not sure about the spelling...
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)U4ikLefty
(4,012 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)U4ikLefty
(4,012 posts)I'm sure he is because he is such an honorable family-man
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Then when I got divorced, I got my name back faster than a light particle travels. My ex asked me why I'd done that, and I told him I was not related to his family. I was related to mine.
My next marriage, I'm staying me. Crazy to take on a new identity the moment you fall in love and take vows.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Why should she? That's her name. I never did understand that.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)yeah I know, it should be common sense but......
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I keep trying to.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)either way. It is, and always has been a choice. But, my wife likes her name. Besides, she didn't have to go change her social security card or driver's license, either. There are advantages.
On the other hand, my 87-year-old mom addresses letters to us as: Mrs. and Mrs. Myname Mylastname, using my name. My wife doesn't care. She says, "Well, I am Mrs. Myname Mylastname, too, but I'm still HerFirstname Herlastname, all the same."
And then, there's the odd mail piece that comes addressed to Myname and Herfirstname Herlastname. It's all hilarious.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)johnnie
(23,616 posts)Who would want to change their last name to Man?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Keeping your birth name is automatic, here as abroad. Changing your name involves the Social Security Administration, the IRS, the banks, the credit rating bureaus, etc. But, until recently, schools really couldn't cope with the horror of a mother whose family name didn't match the child's. The presumption that a child takes the father's family name is a whole 'nother thing.
Hyphenation only works with short, Anglo-Saxon names. Two Polacks would generate 15-20 character names--far too long for a computer database.
Many women who do not want to be located rejoice in the "new life" of a name change, at least until the marriage blows up. And then, changing back is just as much work. Moving up in the alphabet is a bonus for those who start below "L"
It's not the romance, it's the record-keeping and the constant explanation....
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)But they don't have to, and so....
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I've been married twice and in neither instance did I care one way or the other. My current wife has kept the last name of the man who married her mother.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)have their mother's last name too?
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Sarah Martinez (mom) Ibarruri (dad). No confusion. The person had 2 parents (obviously - until science changes that), and they receive names from both.
In any case, changing my identity to Sarah Smith, for example, and pretending I am the daughter of some guy's parents, simply because I like some guy enough to marry him, is confusing.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Response to Sarah Ibarruri (Original post)
Obamanaut This message was self-deleted by its author.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)Tikki
(14,557 posts)I married into this family because I loved them more than I
would ever love the family I was born into.
If I could change my birth certificate name, I would.
Tikki
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Tikki
(14,557 posts)Me Sis..
Guess that made my FIL my brother and my husband my nephew...
Tikki
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)Neoma
(10,039 posts)Because my husbands name has 5 less letters to it. Having to write 9 letters got old.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)has 10 letters in it. When my grandparents came to this country they shortened our last name at Ellis Island from 14 letters to 10. Whew. . .
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I was almost 30 when I married ... I had built a reputation in nursing that was identified with my name ... I could see no reason to give that up
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)having careers. It's silly for them to lose their identity.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I'm going to be 50 this month ...
Actually, I have several friends in my age group that have been identified by their birth name only.
Oddly, I have found (i realize its anecdotal and means nothing) that all (100%) of the younger women I know have changed their names ... I don't 'get it" (I suppose I don't need to understand their choice).
For some reason it irks me when a woman prefers to be addressed as Mrs. X (I know it shouldn't, but in honesty it does)
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)the woman REALLY is a nobody, with no identity, and in a sense, she's like a daughter of the husband. Very odd, really.
mzteris
(16,232 posts)You lose YOUR identity (name).
It's a indicator of ownership and subserviience. A completely archaic and sexist "custom".
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)is how it is encouraged.
mzteris
(16,232 posts)I got a maaa-uhn.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Skittles
(153,160 posts)ddeclue
(16,733 posts)I have found a few times where locating an old school mate or friend who got married on facebook to be impossible but not usually.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)change via the name change.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)1monster
(11,012 posts)in it for personal reasons.
I was happy to change it.
DavidDvorkin
(19,475 posts)On my wife's site, I put her maiden name in the meta tags. People have found her by searching for her by that name; the search brought them to her site.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,475 posts)And maybe other such sites. They list women by both names, because of course people are searching for classmates by the names they remember them by.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)their married names.
DavidDvorkin
(19,475 posts)joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Seriously, it gets old...
Peregrine Took
(7,413 posts)Isn't that the purpose of them?
The OP had an opinion to throw out there and now we are kicking it around.
No one is telling anyone what to do. SHeesh!!!!
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)SHeesh!!!!
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Apparently not.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)"I would think step 1 before clicking on a topic title is to read it. Apparently not."
On this we agree
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Too damn many people want/wish/desire/hope/believe that others would be just like them and live according to their views (even on DU).
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)At no point did the OP state that women should be required to keep her birth name .... at no point was the desire expressed to codify this into law.
I wish people didn't smoke ... at no point would I support or advocate legislating this ... or telling folk they shouldn't.
graywarrior
(59,440 posts)And I hear what you're saying.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)joeglow3
(6,228 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,611 posts)When you say things like it's odd when the woman takes the man's name, that really annoys me. I am not odd.
And I did not lose my identity. My identity is much more than my name, last or otherwise.
Good grief.
Do you not understand to each her own?
scorpiogirl
(717 posts)It is beyond annoying to be considered subservient because you do something most consider traditional. Stating opinion as fact really bugs me too.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Pool Hall Ace
(5,849 posts)And even though my marriage is in the crapper, I may just keep my husband's name in the event of a divorce! My brother's ex-wife kept his last name when they divorced.
I agree with Peggy; to each her own.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)acquaintances, young, old, or middle age, used her husband's name. They have 2 names, but one is their father's and one is their mother's.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)My daughter-in-law was thrilled to take her husbands name, but she wasn't pressured into doing so. As for me, after divorcing, I dropped my husband's name AND my father's name, and paid a lawyer to make my middle name (which was my grandmother's first name) my last. It was a statement for me, and I've never regretted it.
Choice is the key word. Women who choose to take a husband's name are entitled to do so without disrespect, for whatever their personal reasons. Sorry if it's inconvenient for you or others.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)the way that societal pressure works is by making it appear very romantic that the wife obliterate her name, while the husband keep his forever. But no, it's not an individual pressure. There's no need for individual pressure, when it's already promoted by being romanticized.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)like saying a woman must be subservient to take her husband's name? A little reverse discrimination, maybe? There seems to be a new brand of "feminism" afoot, that makes the freedom to choose okay as long it is a choice that is acceptable to the brand.
madmom
(9,681 posts)husbands name very few with mine, in our town. In fact everyone with mine are closely related. My daughter writes and uses my maiden name.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)It's easier when women keep some sort of identity.
madmom
(9,681 posts)Hatchling
(2,323 posts)Or returning to my maiden name which I hated. It was a name that was easy to make mean word puns with. But as much as I liked my married name I was just sick of being named and defined in a patriarchal society as an extension of some man so I chose my own last name, one that has several different meanings.
Unfortunately this does mean that people I used to know can't easily locate me, but I'm not so sure I really mind that.
However, if you go to a site like people search, put in the maiden name and the name of the city you last knew them in, you will probably be able to locate them. I just did that and found myself rather quickly.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)been changed LOL!
ecstatic
(32,701 posts)Both last names separated by a hyphen? Sounds good, but then when they get married and have kids, won't their kids' names end up very very long? I'm just curious about how people handle it over there.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)they use the mother's and the father's, both, since both are parents of the child, not just one.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)typically the father of the father of the father of the father of the father. Not a combo of the father of the father of the father of the father and the father of the father of the father of the mother.
Spain, yes. But that does not make it "European fashion".
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)France, Italy, Spain, and many others don't expect that.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)And yes, they do expect that in France though, like in the USA, there are those who don't, who are changing things. But like here in the USA, while their name may stay the same on drivers licenses, soc sec cards, unless they take measures to change it, most people in France do expect that.
Don't know about Italy beyond friends who mostly (as here in USA) the woman uses the man's last name after they are married.
Let's see.
UK
Ireland
Scotland
Germany
Poland
Switzerland
Sweden
Norway
Austria
Czech
Hungary
Ukraine
Belgium
Netherlands
Slovakia
Croatia
Serbia
Bulgaria
Greece
Romania
Portugal
Denmark
I am sure there are more not springing to mind at the moment
Which "many others" of these do you mean?
Veruca Salt
(921 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I do, too.
Every single woman I know uses her maiden name and her married name.
Facebook, as with genealogy, rely on knowing a person's "maiden" name in order to locate them or their records.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)The women I know are pretty much split 50-50 on this decision. And I'm certainly not going to throw a finger-wagging hissyfit at the women who choose to change their name, even if it does make it a little harder for childhood friends to track them down.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I started doing in myself 37 years ago, but dropped it because it was lso ong tosign things with both. In today's tech world, how many things to you have to WRITE your name to?
My 27 year old daughter uses both. My 32 year old engaaged gay daughter says she and her future wife with use both names.
It seems the younger generation has the right idea.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Very good to know how other countries use women's names.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... women keep their birth names. like all things Islam is practiced differently in different countries .... Muslim Indians rend to follow the Indian naming traditions (as an example)
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)all women use their mother's and father's surnames. Same in Italy, France, and many other countries. No changing. When I was in Spain, I used my mother's and father's names, both. It was quite a change from when I was married and even my (only) surname, as used in this country - my dad's - disappeared. I was sooo happy using my mom and dad's names. Every document was in my mom and dad's names.
I was considering changing my surname (which once again my dad's) to my mom's surname, hyphen, then my dad's name. That's how my name was in Spanish, sans the hyphen.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)That's the only possible biological reason I can come up for it.
No matter that the girl's X chromosomes also get that name cuz you can't tell the difference between them.
Some genealogical research follows the Y chromosomes, literally.
edit: oops, not really relevent for a woman changing her name, more for how the kids are named...
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)and then taking the husbands last name as their own.
Do you see this trend too?
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Perhaps in big cities, or up north it might be different?
JSnuffy
(374 posts)... as did many of her friends who married other Europeans.
Why don't you let everyone do what they like and keep your name if you want?
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Some change their name and some don't. It's a choice for them to make.
RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)My wife had no right to my name, it's mine it wasn't hers.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)want them to do, no questions asked - so you can find them on Facebook easier! Absurd.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)For the record, my wife kept her own last name.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)vaberella
(24,634 posts)I wonder where you got that everyone keeps their last names. That's hardly the case. Most women in France for instance are not even getting married, since non-married couples can share the same advantages as married couples. However those who do get married a lot of them give up their names.
As a womanist, I don't see what is wrong with a woman wanting to give up her name as a romantic act. In this day and age many women know it's a personal choice since there are plenty of women have dual names. But I don't wish women to stop--- it is their prerogative. I still see Michelle Obama as a strong woman despite the fact she doesn't carry her own name. Carrying the name of one's husband is a personal choice and I don't see it holding the same gravitas it did 200 or so years ago.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)and has close friends dating back to the mid-1940s (and all -- gasp! -- without social media). It's really not "close to impossible to maintain friendships" -- one just needs to put forth the effort.
My mother has remained "herself" no matter which last name she posseses.
To each his or her own.
surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)I'm a woman who has been married for over 20 years. I kept my name automatically. It would have taken some paperwork to actually change it to my husband's last name. Perhaps this varies from state to state.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)But the promotion of the woman taking the man's name is associated with romance, and it continues to be done. Women who don't are looked upon rather oddly.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Guy Montag
(126 posts)But an option should be for the husband to take his wife's name if he decides to, or add it to his name in a hyphenated way.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)It's just as easy (or difficult to go through the process) for a man to change his last name as it is for a woman.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 23, 2012, 03:11 PM - Edit history (1)
My niece married a guy with her mother's maiden name so that name is back.
Edited to change femail to female- I wrote FEMAIL!!!??? where's the spelling police-I want to turn myself in.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)My last name, a first name of her choosing. She dropped her given middle name.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Edweird
(8,570 posts)No, I don't regret the tattoo.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Edweird
(8,570 posts)Probably not most people's idea of 'cute'. I work outside and it's 10 years old, so it's pretty faded.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)but it's kinda like getting a makeover.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)I am divorced and ready to move on. The fading seem poetically appropriate. I have no need to 'hang on to the past' by refreshing it - I am content to allow it slip away.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Thanks for sharing that with me.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)Marrying does not automatically legally change a woman's name.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)the wiki thing posted above.
There is a convention that you can start using your husband's (or wife's) last name after being married, may have to show marriage certificate but the usage is accepted. Rather like you can use a different name any time if you so wish, if you are not intending to deceive others. This doesn't make it legal, but is accepted practice.
I am agreeing with you here.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I am changing to Japanese citizenship and will be taking my wife's name.
My wife's father, btw, also was an adopted husband who gave up his last name and took his wife's name.
It is done in Japan to keep a daily tree alive when there are no males heirs to inherit the name.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)but nowhere else in the U.S. that I know of (unless, of course, you just go through the regular name change process).
karynnj
(59,503 posts)To get your name officially changed you need to ask for it changed. There are reasons for both decisions. I had worked for 13 years before marrying, but I wanted my future kids, husband and me to have the same name. I followed my mom's action when she married in 1949 and made my name officially Karen (maiden name, married name). I used all three names at work - especially on technical memos.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)I wish women in the U.S. automatically kept their last names when they marry
It's close to impossible to locate women friends from school or childhood, because marriage annihilates their name. The dissolving of the woman's name upon marriage is encouraged and associated as somehow being a romantic act.
Men can be located easily because they change nothing when they get married. They remain themselves.
Easier in Europe, where everyone keeps their last name when they get married.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)It is easy, but you have to actively change it. Not to mention, I am in my 60s and I know a large number of married women my age who kept their maiden names. From the younger people I know, if anything, it seems more common now to keep maiden names.
I opted to point out a way to change your name, but retain you identity. (ie anyone from my high school who looked for me on Facebook would easily find me - as my 3 names would attending HHS in the years I did.)
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)and then I mentioned that it is promoted as being a "romantic" thing for women to do, something that is not touted as "romantic" for men (for men to change their surname to the surname of their bride's father).
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Who said anything about legal - you said "automatic", which it isn't. If you do nothing, your name does not change.
I realize that is taking what you wrote literally. I now see that are are saying it is customary or even that societal pressures make it the norm (or default).
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)She would still be known as Jane to her intimates, but not socially.
(Actually changing the woman's surname is stupid, because there are always a number of things that can't be changed, like diplomas, professional certifications, etc. So if one of these is called for, it needs to be accompanied by a copy of the marriage certificate.)
karynnj
(59,503 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Driver's license, passport, professional certification, etc. are all still in her original name.
But she also uses her husbands surname after her first name in social situations. Her bank will cash a check made out using either surname, since it is a joint account with her husband.
There is actually no reason to use only one name. You can use aliases so long as there is no intent to defraud.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Charlemagne
(576 posts)They have to change it themselves. It doesnt just happen. When my wife and I got married 4 years ago she said she would change her name but never got around to it. As such, she still has original last name.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)I wish women in the U.S. automatically kept their last names when they marry
It's close to impossible to locate women friends from school or childhood, because marriage annihilates their name. The dissolving of the woman's name upon marriage is encouraged and associated as somehow being a romantic act.
Men can be located easily because they change nothing when they get married. They remain themselves.
Easier in Europe, where everyone keeps their last name when they get married.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Named me with my first name, my given middle name, and my married name. I dont know where the hell they got that because I dropped my middle name when I married. It infuriated me. Even my drivers license has my name the way i want it. My name is my first name, my maiden name, and my husband's last name (which I've never been fond of).
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)And they have oodles of female bobbleheads that agree with them on it.
raccoon
(31,110 posts)I've thought of changing my last name to something in nature, but at my age it just seems like too much effort.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)or change it just to change it, as a name change. That would work.
Sera_Bellum
(140 posts)There is obvious reading comprehension fail by some here. Your op was done for the purpose of discussion, only. A few if not many probably don't see the name change as a big deal because they haven't had a reason to give it much in-depth thought.
I, for one, am delighted you bring up this topic. Let us not forget as well that most women have no name of their own, if you are married to a man, chances are good you have his last name. If you are not married to a man, you still have a man's last name, your father's. And so on.
I did what suited me, I legally changed my name to something that fit me many years ago. It is not my fathers name, or his fathers, or his fathers. It is MINE.
Thank you for bringing up a worthwhile subject.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)You're quite welcome!
The vestiges of subservience are still with us and romanticized now to maintain them.
glinda
(14,807 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)Did it via court order a couple months after the wedding. Judge asked me why and I said because I work in computers and my 11 letter surname was too long, wife's is only 6.
Coming up on a decade and my father in law i think is finally used to it. Our two kids have my married name. Only trouble I run into is I have to use the maiden name line on forms and applications. Heh.
REP
(21,691 posts)My "maiden name" is hyphenated and very hard for people to spell or pronounce (which is odd; neither name is 'difficult' ) and is variously filed under one name or the other - even within the same beaurocracy; my husband's name, on he other hand, is very unusual and nobody can spell or pronounce it. If had wanted to change it, it'd still be dealing with the nightmare of errors.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)That would be the closest I could come to the way it's used in many countries where women retain their own family names, rather than lose them.
REP
(21,691 posts)I kept my real name, which is hyphenated. I'm E-P, not E-P-G.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)SwissTony
(2,560 posts)but many adopt their husband's name. A few hyphenate their names.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 23, 2012, 11:59 AM - Edit history (1)
Now all that's left for me to do is find a future wife...
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Even if I love her what give her (or anyone) the right to step in and swipe my name? Why call yourself something you're not? Makes the same amount of sense as me taking hers...
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)All those years ago, my wife stepped in and swiped my name.
Damn her.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)lynne
(3,118 posts)- but I have a friend in Europe who took her husband's name. Go figure.
As far as a hyphenated name, what's up with that? IMO, that's worse than taking your spouse's name. It's as though they can't decide WHO they really are.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)I'm thinking of hyphenating for the simple purpose of having my mom's name and my dad's name. In Spain everyone automatically has both surnames. Without hyphens. It's impossible here, because only one surname is permitted if one does not hyphenate.
As for adding the husband's name using a hyphen, that's still taking on the husband's name, but at least those women are making an attempt at keeping their own family name, identity, or what-have-you.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)We did not have that problem since we gave our children their own last names. The oldest is Busty McAwesomePants and the little guy is Irony McAwesomePants.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Jennicut
(25,415 posts)It is all about personal choice. No one should be looked down upon either way in my opinion. There is also people who combine both their names when they get married which is great too. But personally, I couldn't wait to get rid of my maiden name. It was pretty awful.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Maybe in Spain, as you wrote, but this is not common. In France, per the wiki you quoted, it is like in USA. You keep your same birth name on SS card, drivers lic, other legal things unless you change it. However, common usage women often use the same last name as their husband.
Other than that inaccuracy, my self, my husband, my child, all have different last names, which made it difficult dealing with an idiotic school person yrs ago who kept insisting on sending stuff to my child's biological non-custodial parent since they had the same last name.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Paul never married.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)claims the Bible books are mostly forgeries. lol
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)My sister has kept her ex-husband's last name because her kids have that last name.
If women were to start keeping their maiden name after marriage I think it might make more sense for the kids to take the mother's name since there is a greater tendency for them to stay with her if the marriage breaks up.
I'm not against the idea, still kicking it around.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Apparently about 10% are not genetically related to the mother's husband.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)and in a month you have a million dollars?
The first generation would have 2 last names. The second would have 4, the third 8, the forth 16......
Doesn't seem practical.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Portugal, Italy, etc. etc.
I wasn't born here. I recall my shock when I was told that I would no longer use my mother's surname, only my father's. You could've knocked me over. I honestly didn't get it. What kind of place used only the men's names???
Then when I grew up and got married, my husband was all romantic about the fact that I would dump my father's name and take his father's surname. Ahem. He actually TOLD ME THIS. I didn't get it, but since all my other female friends that had gotten married took their husband's father's surnames, and my husband was feeling oh so romantic about it, well, hell, I changed my name to that of his father's. Ahem. It sucked and I shouldn't have done it. He didn't change his name to my mother's surname.
Anywho, that was the second time I lost a surname.
When I got divorced, I RAN, not walked, to the courthouse. There, I filled out a form, paid my money, and voila! I at least had my surname back.
A few years later, I moved to Spain (where all my grandparents were born). Because I worked there, I had to complete all kinds of forms. The forms were all like this:
First name Father's Surname Mother's Surname
That's the way all names are there.
It was rather a beautiful moment for me to have come full circle, and returned once again to my original name. I loved it!
Then I returned here, and once again had to dump my mother's name. Only father's surnames needed, thank you very much.
And that is my bio, as told by the usage of my name.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)and ignore your grandmother's last names?
It seems like the same system, one generation removed.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)Annihilates? As a woman, please stop giving women a bad rap on this board.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Positive effort is required to change it.
If a woman does not seek to change her name after marriage, it doesn't change.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)But if you don't actively start using a new name, it doesn't change.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I could take a guess.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Or did you mean I am clueless?
My 1st husband & I had a long talk after being married when I didn't change my name. I was young and uppity, told him it was my name, why change it? He said he'd always wanted someone to take his name. Told him to get a dog. Finally I gave in, told him I'd use my surname as middle name, his surname as last. His response was "you can't do that!". We didn't last long.
I've thought of changing my last name to something for me rather than my father's father's father's father's....surname, but have had this one long enough and it is just me.
I guess people get used to how things are and assume that they must be that way, but there have been enough different name things around now for long enough that I don't understand why some people don't understand that there is the legal way to petition and name change, then there is the simply using another name for name change. And that married name changes are typically the second. You need to actively send in your legal marriage certificate to get your driver's license or ss card name changed, and petition through the court also.
stuntcat
(12,022 posts).
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)I knew no one who didn't.
Of course, I'm from a background in which women do not take the husband's surname, but keep their own, so I did think it was rather odd. When I divorced, I practically ran to court to do a name change back to my own. Easy-peasy. Fill out a form, pay a small amount, done!
TheManInTheMac
(985 posts)Ter
(4,281 posts)Women get the opportunity to change their name, we don't. No fair, I don't like my last name.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)My brother changed his last name right after he turned 18.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)iwillalwayswonderwhy
(2,602 posts)Is that it is inconvenient for YOU because you can't look up somebody.
I believe in choice.
I dropped my middle name and inserted my original last name. The people I truly care about know my name. I have not lost my identity.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)She didn't have to do anything to keep her original last name, just not change it. Bingo, donr deal. Doesn't bother me in the least, although occasionally there are times I have to explain that we are indeed married in some business matters. Not that big of a deal really.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)easier because women maintain their same identity.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Though admittedly she did because going to the bank, the DMV, City Hall and all the other hoops you have to jump through to change your name and retain the ability to drive, access your bank account, vote, get mail, etc. was more of a deciding factor than any sense of feminism or familial pride.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)had to go to the local driver's license office and change my driver's license too.
yourout
(7,527 posts)I think it was more a case of not liking his last name though.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)slutticus
(3,428 posts)You have to fill out paperwork to change your name. Do nothing, and the name doesn't change.
My wife kept her last name. Makes things easier. We actually thought about both changing our name to something different, but we couldn't agree on a name we both liked that wouldn't freak our families out
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)They have enough on their plate with me being the feisty one. lol
And yep, women are not held at gunpoint to change their name, but then I never said that. I said I wished women would keep their own name.
I did say, though, that nearly all women opt for the name change upon marriage, because the tradition from the days when women were chattel has been kept. No longer is it a matter of law. Now it's kept by being romanticized.
Here's an interesting excerpt from an explanation on colonial women's (lack of) rights:
Colonial American women's rights were restricted by the patriarchal view of English Common Law. As in England, women were viewed as chattel and had no individual legal rights. However, American frontier life and the small communities allowed some Colonial women to have more legal and personal rights in the Colonies than in England.
...Husband and wife were considered "one person at law" to be controlled by the husband. A wife and her children were a husband's possessions. However, some wives had a degree of financial independence from their husbands through dowries.
Read more: About Colonial Women's Rights | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/about_4571155_colonial-womens-rights.html#ixzz1kOPOQSLm
Dorian Gray
(13,493 posts)even when I changed my name from my father's name to my first husband's name back to my father's name and now to my second husband's name.
A name is just a name. I don't think of it as anything other than a moniker. I use my maiden name as a middle name. People have had no trouble locating me.
krawhitham
(4,644 posts)Our son took my last name, which is something the school system still has problems with and he has been in the system for 10 years. We get letters addressed to the wrong last name more than we get mail addressed to the right name
eridani
(51,907 posts)--would have my husband's last name and a girl would have mine.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)And when I marry my best friend, she and I are going to keep our own last names, hyphenated.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Do they exchange names? Do they generally hyphenate names? Do they do nothing at all and just keep their names?
ceile
(8,692 posts)And if/when we have kids, they'll have my last name.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Hosnon
(7,800 posts)Bob Smith marries Susan Jones. They hyphenate accordingly: Bob Smith-Jones and Susan Jones-Smith.
When they have a child, the order is determined by gender. So, baby John will legally be John Smith-Jones; baby Carol will legally be Carol Jones-Smith.
When John or Carol marry, they drop the opposite-gender portion and the process restarts (e.g., John Smith-(spouse's surname); Carol Jones-(spouse's surname)).
This prevents ever lengthening names and allows everyone to more easily trace their lineages.
Clunky but I was bored at some point in the last few years...
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)I'm a little confused by what you mean by 'automatic'. When we got married, my wife kept her name because she never filled out the form to change it, so I believe the current system is that by DEFAULT, women keep their name unless they explicitly request to change it.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Here you go:
Colonial American women's rights were restricted by the patriarchal view of English Common Law. As in England, women were viewed as chattel and had no individual legal rights.
Yet once a woman married, all of her rights and properties were governed by her husband.
Husband and wife were considered "one person at law" to be controlled by the husband. A wife and her children were a husband's possessions. However, some wives had a degree of financial independence from their husbands through dowries.
Read more: About Colonial Women's Rights | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/about_4571155_colonial-womens-rights.html#ixzz1kQ8a9800
maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)are you advocating that if a woman might desire to take her husband's name, that she no longer be allowed to?
I understand the origins of the concept. I also understand cultural tradition. my wife didn't take my name, but if someone wants to, I would support her right to do so. actually, in general I support someone's right to change their name, not just in the case of marriage.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)what do you mean when you say 'automatically kept their last names' and how does this notion differ from today's where, by default, a woman does keep her name unless she files paperwork requesting it be changed?
are you advocating that people should not be allowed to change their names?
neither your OP nor your response addresses either of those questions directly. if they did indirectly, there must have been a few logical steps that I was failing to take to connect those points. yes, I understand society encourages the practice. yes, I realize that Europe has a different, simpler system. yes, I understand that the practice stems from repressive historical roots. I understand and generally agree with each of those points -- but none of them answers my questions. thanks in advance for your patience!
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)And if you are, come out with it rather than beating around the bush to prove some point you're just dying for the opportunity to make.
maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)I'm also not trying to get into a flame way. I've read a many of your posts, and while I don't agree with all your opinions, I generally respect the thought that went into your comments. I've asked two very straightforward questions multiple times and you keep referring me to your OP, which doesn't address either directly. I'm genuinely trying to understand this issue.
1. how does "automatically kept their names" differ from what we have today? if you've answered that questions anywhere, please reply with quote. again, I'm not fishing, not trying to get to any secondary point; just want to understand what change it is that you're advocating for. I'm not clear what you mean by 'automatically'. As I stated in above posts, women in the US today do keep their names upon marriage unless they request to have it changed. If I'm mistaken here, please correct me.
2. today, people have a legal option to change their names. your comments seem to imply that you don't want people to be able to change their names, citing the difficulty in tracking down old acquaintances and the simplicity of the European system. I'm trying to figure out if you're advocating to legislate that option away or only advocating for social change without legislation. again, I haven't seen you respond to that point -- if you have, please reply with quote.
I just reread your previous comments for at least the 4th time, and copied them below. I am highly confident that neither speaks to what you mean by "automatically" keeping names and neither addresses whether or not your advocating for legal change.
OP
It's close to impossible to locate women friends from school or childhood, because marriage annihilates their name. The dissolving of the woman's name upon marriage is encouraged and associated as somehow being a romantic act.
Men can be located easily because they change nothing when they get married. They remain themselves.
Easier in Europe, where everyone keeps their last name when they get married.
REPLY:
Here you go:
Colonial American women's rights were restricted by the patriarchal view of English Common Law. As in England, women were viewed as chattel and had no individual legal rights.
Yet once a woman married, all of her rights and properties were governed by her husband.
Husband and wife were considered "one person at law" to be controlled by the husband. A wife and her children were a husband's possessions. However, some wives had a degree of financial independence from their husbands through dowries.
Read more: About Colonial Women's Rights | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/about_4571155_colonial-womens-rights.html#ixzz1kQ8a9800
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)in most cases, the female.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)and to abandon their own.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)who choose to change names. Sorry that it inconveniences you.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)what is best for them.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)If a woman doesn't want to change her name, she shouldn't.
I don't feel like it's encouraged. It's a free country.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)tradition from when women were chattel. It's romanticized.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Again, it should be up to them. They may be encouraged, but ultimately the choice is up to them.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)If that's what the couple chooses to do.
blueamy66
(6,795 posts)I am too old to relinquish my maiden name....but have no problem adding my guy's name.
Synicus Maximus
(860 posts)the husbands name instead? When a child is born would their last name be their mothers/ ( which actually makes sense) in which case you are only changing form " dissolving of the woman's name " to dissolving of the man name " when a child is born?
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Here's an American living in Spain, explaining the Spanish naming system to other Americans. He's wrong in some things he says. For example, he says people don't have middle names in Spain, while they certainly do. Also, he clearly hates the whole naming system over there, and makes it clear that he's not fond of 'feminists,' but at least it provides a basic explanation of how it works:
...There are four basic rules to surname inheritance in Spain:
Everyone has two last names.
Your first last name is your fathers first last name.
Your second last name is your mothers first last name.
Women do not change their last names when they get married.
Thats it. Thats the whole system. To Spaniards, the fact that women in some countries change their last names when they marry seems like a loss of identity. How can you just give up who you are like that?, they say.
Occasionally, they will play the feminist card and claim that giving children only their fathers surname is chauvinistic and that the Spanish system isnt because it values the surname of the mother, but if you look closely, the Spanish system is only valuing the mothers fathers surname. The truth is that womens surnames do get lost in Spain, it just takes another generation to do so...
http://erikras.com/2009/01/28/whats-the-deal-with-last-names-in-spain/