Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump shakes up national security team: Waltz tapped for UN post
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/05/01/mike-waltz-trump-signal-chat/82674433007/
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump shakes up national security team: Waltz tapped for UN post (Original Post)
elocs
May 2025
OP
Maddow Blog-Trump boots Waltz from national security adviser role, nominates for U.N. ambassadorship
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2025
#12
Deuxcents
(26,912 posts)1. Musical chairs..ridiculous
Lovie777
(22,961 posts)2. And it does get worse...............
BootinUp
(51,314 posts)3. Have Putin send over some candidates. Nt
PJMcK
(25,048 posts)4. Let me get this straight
Walz fucks up with the Signal chat.
After weeks of criticisms, Trump moves Walz out of the NSC because of the backlash.
But Trump decides to move Walz to the United Nations because... why?
What a clusterfuck.
unblock
(56,198 posts)5. Stefanik must be pulling her hair out today!
BootinUp
(51,314 posts)6. Because she wanted the UN job?
Prairie Gates
(8,151 posts)11. Beat me to it!
She must be seeeeeeething!
MurrayDelph
(5,749 posts)8. To quote Stephen Colbert
"He's rearranging the deck chairs on The Hindenburg."
karynnj
(60,965 posts)9. This needs Senate confirmation
Given how he treated national security, is it possible to find 4 Republican Senators who vote no?
newdeal2
(5,409 posts)13. Let's be real - no
They don’t value the UN anyway.
Prairie Gates
(8,151 posts)10. Walz failed right into Elise Stefanik's Manhattan penthouse
Movin' on up, as they say, to the East Side.
To a deluxe apartment in the skyyyyy...
Poor Elise.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,822 posts)12. Maddow Blog-Trump boots Waltz from national security adviser role, nominates for U.N. ambassadorship
Secretary of State Marco Rubio will take over Waltz's White House duties in an interim capacity, Trump posted on Truth Social.
On the one hand, Waltz joins an ignominious group of failed Trump WH national security advisers (Flynn, McMaster, Bolton).
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-05-01T16:18:36.445Z
On the other, he also joins an ignominious group of failed House Republicans tapped for key second-term posts (Gaetz, Stefanik, and now Waltz). www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
On the one hand, Waltz joins an ignominious group of failed Trump WH national security advisers (Flynn, McMaster, Bolton).
On the other, he also joins an ignominious group of failed House Republicans tapped for key second-term posts (Gaetz, Stefanik, and now Waltz).
On the other, he also joins an ignominious group of failed House Republicans tapped for key second-term posts (Gaetz, Stefanik, and now Waltz).
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/mike-waltz-out-trump-national-security-adviser-signal-chat-rcna204115
As recently as Wednesday, during the latest White House Cabinet meeting, national security adviser Mike Waltz seemed to go out of his way to offer effusive praise for Donald Trump. The president’s difficulties with Waltz have been well documented, especially in the wake of the recent Signal chat scandal, but the adviser took the opportunity to make clear that he was pleased to be part of the White House team.
Less than 24 hours later, it appears Waltz is losing his White House job — while being nominated for a different job. Trump wrote on his social media platform:
This is, among things, deeply odd — in part because Waltz has no meaningful diplomatic experience, in part because there's so little overlap between his current position and the U.N. ambassadorship, and in part because it's difficult to imagine how one person is supposed to be the nation's chief diplomat at the State Department and the president's top national security adviser in the West Wing.
What's more, with this latest appointment, Rubio now has four rather large roles to manage: secretary of state, acting archivist of the United States, acting administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development, and interim national security adviser......
Publicly, the White House backed Waltz, but NBC News reported that Trump had privately “expressed frustration” with his aide. That coincided with a Politico report on a private presidential meeting in which top officials, including Vice President JD Vance, told Trump to “consider showing him [Waltz] the door.”
A day later, The New York Times reported that the president sought the counsel of a variety of people, asking whether to oust Waltz.
The public chatter ultimately died down, but there was ample evidence that Waltz had been privately sidelined in the West Wing, putting his future in jeopardy.
As for his next gig, the ambassadorship to the United Nations is a Senate-confirmed position, and Waltz's confirmation hearings are bound to be interesting. Observers should expect a great many questions about his ability to handle and protect classified information.
Less than 24 hours later, it appears Waltz is losing his White House job — while being nominated for a different job. Trump wrote on his social media platform:
I am pleased to announce that I will be nominating Mike Waltz to be the next United States Ambassador to the United Nations. ... In the interim, Secretary of State Marco Rubio will serve as National Security Advisor, while continuing his strong leadership at the State Department.
This is, among things, deeply odd — in part because Waltz has no meaningful diplomatic experience, in part because there's so little overlap between his current position and the U.N. ambassadorship, and in part because it's difficult to imagine how one person is supposed to be the nation's chief diplomat at the State Department and the president's top national security adviser in the West Wing.
What's more, with this latest appointment, Rubio now has four rather large roles to manage: secretary of state, acting archivist of the United States, acting administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development, and interim national security adviser......
Publicly, the White House backed Waltz, but NBC News reported that Trump had privately “expressed frustration” with his aide. That coincided with a Politico report on a private presidential meeting in which top officials, including Vice President JD Vance, told Trump to “consider showing him [Waltz] the door.”
A day later, The New York Times reported that the president sought the counsel of a variety of people, asking whether to oust Waltz.
The public chatter ultimately died down, but there was ample evidence that Waltz had been privately sidelined in the West Wing, putting his future in jeopardy.
As for his next gig, the ambassadorship to the United Nations is a Senate-confirmed position, and Waltz's confirmation hearings are bound to be interesting. Observers should expect a great many questions about his ability to handle and protect classified information.