General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAll they do is take. They give nothing; they create nothing.
It dawned on me - maybe I'm slow - that what's different about this "administration," if that's what we can call it, is that it gives nothing to the nation. It only takes. It has been taking away the benefits, programs, rights and expectations that have been part of the normal operation of government for as long as anyone can remember. For those past years the debate has been how much the government should do, and for whom, and in what form - never that the government shouldn't do anything. Even the taxation issue has now become only a question of how much to take from taxpayers, and from which ones. The rich are destined to benefit from less tax-taking while more, in the form of taxes and everything else, will be taken from the rest of us.
It used to be that legislation was intended to provide for "the general welfare," as the Constitution directs. So programs and benefits were created for that purpose - Social Security and Medicare to benefit the elderly and disabled; rules to reduce environmental pollution, other rules to ensure the safety of products, programs to fund scientific research to cure diseases, programs for disadvantaged groups to gain equal access to education and employment, laws prohibiting racial and gender discrimination, and many other efforts to improve the general welfare of the people. And we have come to rely on these long-standing programs and laws and rules. It was assumed, even by conservatives, that these programs were generally useful and appropriate; the debate was only about how much they should cost - not whether they should exist at all.
They also know at some level that taking an existing benefit away tends to be more controversial than providing it in the first place - which was why the GOP fought the ACA so hard. They're still trying to get rid of it by chipping away at it, but they see that it's become popular and therefore more difficult to kill altogether. Nevertheless, Trump's DOGE and his supine GOP have decided to fuck the general welfare and take away everything all at once. A party that thinks it's OK to deport an American citizen - a child with cancer - has clearly lost its moral compass altogether, never mind the Constitution's direction to promote the general welfare. But I think they might begin to realize that in the long run their taking away will be much more difficult than they expected.
Klarkashton
(5,292 posts)Break to working people if there will even be any break at all. Not only that but the taxes will increase at the state level to compensate for the loss of federal money.
Hugin
(37,847 posts)We arent the resistance, the Retrumplicans are.
They are resisting the inevitable change of a free and democratic society to find its way to happiness and prosperity for all.
3catwoman3
(29,403 posts)
for people. Republicans want to do things to people.
Im pretty sure I first read this here. Succinct and true.
Diamond_Dog
(40,569 posts)Much shorter than my favorite (also seen here on DU):
A Republican says, That will never happen to me, so I dont care.
A Democrat says, That should never happen to anyone, and I DO care.
Diamond_Dog
(40,569 posts)Taking something away from people they dont like is sorta like a win for them.
Promoting the general welfare to them means nanny state - a term they use in disdain for government that looks out for its people.
Their actions of late are despicable to me.
BigMin28
(1,859 posts)the terms general welfare, common good or public good are all on the banned words and phrases list. He is a criminal running a corrupt regime, not an administration. To use one of tsf's favorite sayings, the likes of which have never been seen before. I say that not with a chuckle or sarcasm, but with all seriousness. We are in uncharted territory.
Clouds Passing
(7,928 posts)cachukis
(3,932 posts)taxi
(2,711 posts)For most people, the vast majority of people in this country, the thinking is that a dollar bill is being taken from them and given to someone with less than themself. Let's change how they think.
Now, instead of that one dollar bill they have a couple of quarters, a dime or two, some nickels, and of course pennies. The people who are getting their quarters misguide them by talking about the pennies that are going to those with less. The quarters that are going to the oligarchs, corporations, subsidies, and the entitled are not mentioned. Sure, a few cents does go to those with less but is the quarters, dimes, and nickels that go to those with more than you.
hibbing
(10,597 posts)JCMach1
(29,201 posts)We are going to need to get visceral like this and not be afraid of offending someone to reach people today.