General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe I don't know response when asked if he has to 'uphold the Constitution,'
simply means he actually thinks hes more important than the document .
Let that sink in.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/trump-asked-uphold-constitution-says-dont-know-rcna204580
Remember now they voted for every other president and the Constitution n was still boss.
Impeachment #3 coming up.
Add
drray23
(8,734 posts)malaise
(295,862 posts)Oaths mean nothing to this cretin
Diamond_Dog
(40,512 posts)Efilroft Sul
(4,411 posts)dalton99a
(94,093 posts)
this not treason? So he doesnt know if he has to follow the Constitution of the United States that he took an oath to uphold. The answer he gave, that I dont know if I have to uphold it, imo, means he doesnt believe he has to uphold the Constitution.
Ask Raskin
mopinko
(73,698 posts)grounds for impeachment rt there.
i will say, tho, that for too many lawyers, laws r something their training was about getting around.
malaise
(295,862 posts)Defending it - the truth
mopinko
(73,698 posts)they had any kind of moral compass. i mean, there r plenty of bad laws that shd b gotten around until they fall. but it seems they beat that out of them in law school, too.
hadEnuf
(3,607 posts)If the Republicans don't do it (they won't) then start replacing Republicans. Recalls, investigations - whatever it takes.
mopinko
(73,698 posts)so many of them just handed over the power they fought so hard to get.
cannnnot wrap my head around having the power to stop this shit, and bowing when the ppl who put me there r getting screwed.
the founders counted on that. and it worked til now.
Kid Berwyn
(24,304 posts)Plouffe and DEM election management mightve used this pic to show whos boss in trumpworld:

Sample ad copy:
This photo shows Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Putins puppet. It was not taken by AP or any US media; it was taken by TASS, the official Russian news agency. The US media were not informed about the 2017 visit or invited to report on the visit. We learned about it because the Unstable Moron himself spread the pic proudly on social media.
malaise
(295,862 posts)Rec
hadEnuf
(3,607 posts)TV ads, town halls, demonstrations, media saturation.
With the exceptions of some town halls, not much is happening. ?
Aaeia
(170 posts)IbogaProject
(5,883 posts)Whew, of course he rarely keeps his word.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,548 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(179,548 posts)trump is listening to idiots if he thinks that he can ignore due process. trump swore and oath to defend the Constitution and so far the courts are consistent in ruling that the Constitution requires due process
BREAKING: Trump says on Meet The Press that he doesn't know if everyone deserves due process.
— Krassensteins (@krassenstein.bsky.social) 2025-05-04T14:04:55.229Z
When asked if he has to uphold the Constitution, he says "I don't know, I have brilliant lawyers that work for me."
This should be an IMPEACHABLE defense. Who agrees?
Link to tweet
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/trump-asked-uphold-constitution-says-dont-know-rcna204580
When Welker tried to point out what the Fifth Amendment said, Trump suggested that such a process would slow him down too much.
I dont know. It seems it might say that, but if youre talking about that, then wed have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials, he said. We have thousands of people that are some murderers and some drug dealers and some of the worst people on Earth.
I was elected to get them the hell out of here, and the courts are holding me from doing it, he added.
But even given those numbers that youre talking about, dont you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president? Welker asked.
I dont know, Trump replied. I have to respond by saying, again, I have brilliant lawyers that work for me, and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said.
The Supreme Court has already made it clear to the Trump administration in three different recent decisions that it has to allow basic due process rights for immigrants based on the long-standing understanding of the laws.
That would not require full trials, as Trump suggested. What it would require is the chance to appear before an immigration judge. Such judges are not part of the judicial branch; they are employees of the Justice Department. Administration officials have spoken out against such constraints, leading to allegations that they have defied instructions from lower court judges and even the Supreme Court.