General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNancy Pelosi Says Social Security CUT Proposed By Obama Would 'Strengthen' Program
Was this their plan from the get-go? Did we swallow their seasoned tripe hook, line and sinker?
WASHINGTON -- Congressional Democrats, led by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), signaled greater willingness on Wednesday to cut Social Security benefits, with the party now considering a change to the way inflation is calculated for recipients. Pelosi told reporters on Capitol Hill that a cut proposed by President Barack Obama in the fiscal cliff negotiations would in fact "strengthen" the program, echoing the claims often made by Republicans about entitlement programs they want to slash. Her remarks come a day after she said that liberals in Congress who are unhappy with Obama's concession to the GOP would nevertheless support them.
The cut involves swapping out the traditional method for calculating cost of living increases, based on the current standard for measuring inflation, for something called a chained CPI, or chained Consumer Price Index. The chained CPI works by assuming that when the price of a product, such as beef, gets too high, consumers don't keep paying the higher prices. Instead, the model predicts they will switch to something cheaper, such as chicken, keeping their cost of living lower and leading to a lower rate of inflation, as measured by the chained CPI. The lower rate of inflation would mean a downward adjustment in cost of living, and thus stingier benefits.
The cuts would start small, but wind up costing beneficiaries thousands of dollars over time, which is why Democrats have traditionally fought the idea.But Pelosi wrapped both her arms around it Wednesday, insisting she does not regard it as a "cut." "No, I dont," she told reporters. "I consider it a strengthening of Social Security, but thats neither here nor there."
"Theres no use even discussing that because we dont even know if we have plan," she continued. "And if the savings that the Republicans are talking about is $300 billion, then the cuts to be made on the other side are far lower. And thats how we see it. But it is interesting to see that even with the concessions on cuts and, what you just described, the chained CPI and things like that - the president put on the table what everybody has been discussing for quite a long time. And once again, as he did 18 months ago, the speaker walked away. The speaker walked away. Theres an attempt to try to put it at the presidents doorstep, which is completely ridiculous. In fact, some would say, 'befuddling.'"
cont'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/19/nancy-pelosi-social-security_n_2333285.html
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Just like in the 80's when they raised the retirement age.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)southern_belle
(1,647 posts)Autumn
(48,950 posts)anything except D.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)"It's a gift! A gift to you peasants!!!"
"Be glad you have anything left, ya freeloaders!"
"...ummm, we paid for this?"
"No you didn't!" "Look! Fiscal cliff! Booga!"
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Autumn
(48,950 posts)The bullshit sure is spreading.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Fuck your lies, Nancy.
Autumn
(48,950 posts)I was planning on gouging my fellow old people. I have a feeling cat food is going to be a bit pricey.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)let the top rate go back to 70%
no cap on SS
50% tax rate on capital gains for people making $1 million
forestpath
(3,102 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)doc03
(39,067 posts)changing Medicare into a voucher program.
doc03
(39,067 posts)with a letter to send to Obama, my Senators and that pos f---g teabagger Congressman of mine.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Hitting future ones is bad enough, but to hit immediately those who have mapped out and planned their retirement already, and are living on it, is CRUEL and WRONG.
byeya
(2,842 posts)shcrane71
(1,721 posts)I guess I was wrong.
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)this is the crux of your problems, Democrats. Your elected officials tell you shit they think you want to hear, and then go do the opposite while in office. It's easy for them since they don't intend to share in your fate, and for the most part never needed to worry that they might have to live a life like yours, whether or not they reached high office and used it to acquire connections. They are rewarded for betrayal by people who can afford to give rewards and can afford to really keep track of their actions. Your life gets worse, their life gets better.
Barack Obama: current net worth 11.8 million, and future earnings as a former President - astronomical.
Bill Clinton's earnings since leaving office: over 75 million, all for giving speeches presumably about how he ended welfare, shipped US manufacturing overseas with trade treaties, deregulated the banks unleashing the speculative sickness that demolished what was left of our economy, and got some head from his intern instead of looking out for your interests. Only child, Chelsea Clinton, married off to some member of the Goldman Sachs nomenklatura.
People like these do not represent your interests, can't imagine what your interests are, aren't the least bit interested to know, and don't remember what it's like to be someone like you, if they ever used to be.
Keep voting for them and keep getting more of the same shit.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)These people are the servants of the 1%. They are well paid for their service in propagandizing us.
After the Deepwater Horizon disaster, President Obama made a speech with he ended on the wonderful plan of "praying" our way out of the problem. After I got done picking my jaw off the floor, I found it very useful to think of the Presidency as simply the "Press Secretary of the 1%." He gets his marching orders and his job is to put it to us in a way that we accept it.
The ones who do it very well are rewarded by having they and their children into the 1%, which is possibly the only safe place left on earth anymore.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Cut $26B from the War Department and make this part of the COLA for SS.
Pricks. They are squeezing $13B for what? To give to the Billionaires?
This is *our* money. WE don't want cut our earned benefits...
This is getting to be a turning point - one way or another.
neverforget
(9,513 posts)mother earth
(6,002 posts)is BS. We are, indeed, no longer the party of FDR. I'm ashamed of NP & Obama for pissing away all we've worked for.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)Riley18
(1,127 posts)Now I can't stand the sight of her. All these rich people are working together. This has been planned all along.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)That they were the "Leaders."
I thought at the time, and still do, that they are public servants that serve at our pleasure. The fact that they think otherwise tells me they don't believe in Democracy.
City Lights
(25,787 posts)I feel a little sick...
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)
amborin
(16,631 posts)rds; totally Orwellian
cynical, sadistic, scary