Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Norbert

(7,762 posts)
Thu May 29, 2025, 02:03 PM May 2025

Mark Carney on the US Court of International Trade Decision

"It confirmed what we always held: that American tariffs against Canadian are unlawful and unjustified."

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mark Carney on the US Court of International Trade Decision (Original Post) Norbert May 2025 OP
Mr Carney is right, but BOSSHOG May 2025 #1
In a democracy We The People are responsible for our government. Irish_Dem May 2025 #2
K&R spanone May 2025 #3
Thanks for posting! rurallib May 2025 #4
Mahalo, Norbert & PM Cha May 2025 #5
And then the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which oversees the US CIT, reversed the decision. Efilroft Sul May 2025 #6
In order to get a stay of the ruling on tariffs, trump's attorneys had to promise to refund all tariffs LetMyPeopleVote May 2025 #7
I saw that on The Last Word, uh, last night. Efilroft Sul May 2025 #8

BOSSHOG

(44,738 posts)
1. Mr Carney is right, but
Thu May 29, 2025, 02:07 PM
May 2025

I’d prefer he referred to them properly as trumps tariffs. The good guys still want to be buds with Canadians.

Irish_Dem

(81,242 posts)
2. In a democracy We The People are responsible for our government.
Thu May 29, 2025, 02:10 PM
May 2025

One third voted for Trump. They wanted Trump in office.
Another one third didn't vote. They didn't care if Trump got into office.

Efilroft Sul

(4,413 posts)
6. And then the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which oversees the US CIT, reversed the decision.
Thu May 29, 2025, 04:30 PM
May 2025

From the linked article below:

"A federal appeals court allowed President Trump's sweeping tariffs to temporarily stay in effect, a day after the US Court of International Trade blocked their implementation after deeming the method used to enact them "unlawful."

"That means Trump's tariff agenda remains intact, if in flux, in the latest twist in the unfolding legal saga."

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/trump-tariffs-live-updates-appeals-court-allows-tariffs-to-stay-in-effect-after-trade-court-rebuke-191201904.html?.tsrc=1340&ncid=crm_-1285232-20250529-272--A&bt_user_id=nFJBdiOUqlEslvrMDNC5WOir%2FH2Tiojfa2WmzfT0jc7tUNOnEvrscpT1UUm%2BkRR%2Bal%2BDDZKf%2BUVue%2FX8sjj3uuelBYRP7zaU3fPIWXamQPgRLFljNJAMw32qlw%2BCspMu&bt_ts=1748549726131

Crap.

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,822 posts)
7. In order to get a stay of the ruling on tariffs, trump's attorneys had to promise to refund all tariffs
Fri May 30, 2025, 10:30 AM
May 2025

trump's attorneys had to make the legal commitment to refund all tariffs in order to get a stay of the rulings on trump's tariffs. The court of appeals issued the stay of the two injunctions based on the agreement by the trump administration to refund all tariffs if the ruling of these two courts are upheld on appeal. 






BREAKING - Trump admin pledges to refund tariffs: Donald Trump’s Justice Department persuaded the U.S. Court of Appeals to stay the lower court’s injunction on his emergency tariffs—after pledging to refund anyone who paid them if it ultimately loses. In its filings, the government stated, “If tariffs imposed on plaintiffs during these appeals are ultimately held unlawful, then the government will issue refunds to plaintiffs, including any post-judgment interest that accrues.” The court granted the stay.


Efilroft Sul

(4,413 posts)
8. I saw that on The Last Word, uh, last night.
Fri May 30, 2025, 10:37 AM
May 2025

I have my doubts about the Trump administration providing refunds (he has a history of stiffing businesses) or honoring the ruling of any court that tries to reel in his executive authority. It all comes down to who is going to enforce the ruling.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mark Carney on the US Cou...