Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LauraInLA

(2,248 posts) Wed Jun 11, 2025, 05:38 PM Jun 2025

Ok, ANOTHER update on the Boyle Heights car crash: interview with the wife who says she and their toddler were in

the car. She opens the door to demonstrate how they hit the side next to the child’s seat.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKxqB4HhTMm/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ%3D%3D

So sounds like Feds, not ICE. Still question the need to crash his car to get him.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ok, ANOTHER update on the Boyle Heights car crash: interview with the wife who says she and their toddler were in (Original Post) LauraInLA Jun 2025 OP

Context? TheProle Jun 2025 #1

Here's an article chowder66 Jun 2025 #2

Boyle heights, ICE crashed into car to make an arrest Blues Heron Jun 2025 #3

TheProle

(3,890 posts)

1. Context?

Reply to LauraInLA (Original post)

Wed Jun 11, 2025, 05:46 PM

Jun 2025

chowder66

(11,748 posts)

2. Here's an article

Reply to TheProle (Reply #1)

Wed Jun 11, 2025, 05:51 PM

Jun 2025

According to the family of the driver, he was wanted in connection with an incident that happened at an anti-ICE protest in Paramount over the weekend.

The other side:
The Department of Homeland Security said this was a targeted arrest on a "violent rioter" who punched a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer.

https://www.foxla.com/news/la-ice-federal-agents-in-hit-and-run

Blues Heron

(8,229 posts)

3. Boyle heights, ICE crashed into car to make an arrest

Reply to TheProle (Reply #1)

Wed Jun 11, 2025, 05:51 PM

Jun 2025

in other words, the cops are rampaging

Reply to this discussion