Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Supreme Court justice suggests her colleagues have been taken in by 'moneyed interests'
After the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 majority decision siding with the fossil fuel industry over environmental regulators, one of the dissenters lamented not just the decision itself, but the propensity of the nation's highest court to side with the rich and powerful.
Slate's Mark Joseph Stern wrote Friday that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson – who was appointed by former President Joe Biden — used her dissent in the Diamond Alternative Energy v. Environmental Protection Agency decision to warn that the 7-2 ruling (with Justice Sonia Sotomayor being the only judge to join her dissent) may encourage corporations to continue chipping away at the regulatory system. She also called out the judiciary's pattern of showing favoritism toward "moneyed interests" over less powerful litigants like workers and criminal defendants.
“This case gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this Court than ordinary citizens,” wrote Jackson on Friday. She added, “I worry that the fuel industry’s gain comes at a reputational cost for this Court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests.”
The associate justice went on to say that while “knowledgeable researchers" have considered such a viewpoint "unfounded," Americans' view of the Court as an extension of the wealthy and well-connected "seems pervasive.” She added that “even the mere appearance of favoritism” could “undermine confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.”
Justice Jackson went on to point out that her colleagues on the conservative-majority Supreme Court are much more likely to grant writs of certiorari (an agreement to hear a case) to powerful petitioners like corporations over "ordinary citizens," like victims of warrantless wiretapping and discrimination. She used the final portion of her dissent to remind her fellow justices of the phrase "Equal Justice Under Law," which is etched into the Supreme Court's facade:
Slate's Mark Joseph Stern wrote Friday that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson – who was appointed by former President Joe Biden — used her dissent in the Diamond Alternative Energy v. Environmental Protection Agency decision to warn that the 7-2 ruling (with Justice Sonia Sotomayor being the only judge to join her dissent) may encourage corporations to continue chipping away at the regulatory system. She also called out the judiciary's pattern of showing favoritism toward "moneyed interests" over less powerful litigants like workers and criminal defendants.
“This case gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this Court than ordinary citizens,” wrote Jackson on Friday. She added, “I worry that the fuel industry’s gain comes at a reputational cost for this Court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests.”
The associate justice went on to say that while “knowledgeable researchers" have considered such a viewpoint "unfounded," Americans' view of the Court as an extension of the wealthy and well-connected "seems pervasive.” She added that “even the mere appearance of favoritism” could “undermine confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.”
Justice Jackson went on to point out that her colleagues on the conservative-majority Supreme Court are much more likely to grant writs of certiorari (an agreement to hear a case) to powerful petitioners like corporations over "ordinary citizens," like victims of warrantless wiretapping and discrimination. She used the final portion of her dissent to remind her fellow justices of the phrase "Equal Justice Under Law," which is etched into the Supreme Court's facade:
link:https://www.alternet.org/supreme-court-moneyed-interests/
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.