Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

justaprogressive

(7,164 posts)
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 12:40 PM Jun 2025

SCOTUS' 'Skrmetti' Ruling: Without the ERA, Protections Against Sex Discrimination Remain Fragile

In 2022, the Court undid a constitutional right for the first time by declaring that the U.S. Constitution does not confer a right to abortion in the landmark decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. In a decision this week called United States v. Skrmetti, they’ve taken the next step, extending the logic of Dobbs and destabilizing much of the law on sex discrimination.

The majority in Skrmetti was careful to cite case law on sex discrimination and suggest that the law at issue, which banned gender-affirming care for transgender youth, simply raised different issues. But Skrmetti shows how fragile protections against sex discrimination have become without any explicit guarantee, like the Equal Rights Amendment.

Skrmetti involves one of the many laws banning gender-affirming care for trans minors that passed in 2023. A group of plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of the law under the Equal Protection Clause shortly after it passed, relying on the 2020 case, Bostock v. Clayton County, which involved employment discrimination under the landmark Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Bostock reasoned that sex always factored into discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. The Skrmetti plaintiffs tried to make the same point.

A district court seemed persuaded and blocked the Tennessee law from being enforced as the case made its way through the courts, but the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed.

When the Supreme Court agreed to hear the plaintiffs’ appeal, some progressive commentators worried that Skrmetti would spell the end for any protection against sex discrimination. The majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts seemed invested in dispelling that impression. The Court cited canonical sex discrimination cases and repeated that legislation based on sex stereotypes was constitutionally problematic.


https://msmagazine.com/2025/06/20/skrmetti-equal-rights-amendment-sex-discrimination-trans-youth-supreme-court/
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS' 'Skrmetti' Ruling: Without the ERA, Protections Against Sex Discrimination Remain Fragile (Original Post) justaprogressive Jun 2025 OP
What kind of pasta Jilly_in_VA Jun 2025 #1

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS' 'Skrmetti' Ruling...