General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe question is why did the bunker busters fail? WTF would be needed to destroy these bunkers?
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
The question is why did the bunker busters fail? WTF would be needed to destroy these bunkers?
Matthew28
(1,860 posts)Did Iran figure out a new way to build bunkers that make it impossible for our busters to work?
harumph
(3,286 posts)I predicted that crap wouldn't work and I can tell you the military leadership knew it too. But everyone is sucking Trump's cock and
smoking what they're selling.
brush
(61,033 posts)Seems much of this crap of bunker busters is just wishful thinking and weapon design theory.
Response to Matthew28 (Original post)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
harumph
(3,286 posts)Response to harumph (Reply #9)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
harumph
(3,286 posts)LastDemocratInSC
(4,242 posts)BoRaGard
(7,591 posts)that the Gods of War blew chunks, and then soiled their bombwear.

Kinda defeats the purpose?
chelsea0011
(10,222 posts)When I heard they were obliterated, I knew they were already lying.
sarisataka
(22,696 posts)
MrWowWow
(1,461 posts)usonian
(25,390 posts)msongs
(73,764 posts)LudwigPastorius
(14,739 posts)
Production of these were supposedly cancelled 40 years ago, but one never knows...do one?
Brother Buzz
(39,917 posts)They started rolling on the line in May of this year.
But I guarantee the marmalade shartcannon wont touch it because it was a Biden project.
LudwigPastorius
(14,739 posts)He has strategic knowledge the likes of which we've never seen before.
WarGamer
(18,620 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,603 posts)Not that what he says matters anyway. Either the operation achieved its objectives or it didnt. Theres no magical analysis required.
WarGamer
(18,620 posts)The "program" seems unphased... almost unaffected.
The facilities were extensively damaged.
newdeal2
(5,440 posts)They personally designed the bomb and it didnt work
purple_haze
(401 posts)as the propaganda we are being force-fed states, you lost me at "CNN confirmed....."
pwb
(12,687 posts)everywhere. Mountains in that area all have roads bored through them. It makes sense to store everything under ground in that dessert environment. You believed what you were told about our great systems. If you are suggesting we use a nuke to get to their abilities know that over 40,000 service members are in the area and they would surly be targeted by nukes in return. It has always been the first to use a nuke would get a what for from everybody else.
BigmanPigman
(55,180 posts)This made it more clear for me to understand.
brush
(61,033 posts)been manipulated by warmonger Netanyahu to get involed, Mevedev of Russia has hinted they would help Iran get nukes.
jmowreader
(53,206 posts)Step 1: Make a list of all the nations who would elect a vainglorious douchebag who might decide to bomb Iran when things are going badly for him, so as to at least temporarily get the press to ignore his many failures. This list is not long because most nations have better sense than to elect a Donald Trump clone president of anything higher than the dog pound.
Step 2: Get out your copy of "Jane's Defence Systems" and investigate all the ground-penetrating munitions these nations have, paying particular attention to the maximum depth these systems work at.
Step 3: Build the bunker twice as deep as the most-penetrating bomb they have will go, and make sure there isn't a straight shot from an exhaust port to the power plant - you don't want your bunker to meet the same fate as the Death Star.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)Its not a failure of our bombs - Im sure they did their job as designed.
Iran just built their facilities deeper.
And now the world knows how to evade US bunker bombs. Theyre now rendered useless as a weapon. Everyone who needs to create covert untouchable facilities will just match Irans depth
Prairie Gates
(8,183 posts)In other words, a load of horseshit. They're just bombs. They don't magically burrow through the earth before exploding. The whole concept is ridiculous.
There are no bunker busters, and there never have been.
JoseBalow
(9,500 posts)
usonian
(25,390 posts)Jealous of Harry Truman.
Who's going to stop him?
Oh, and one more thing.
STFU about your moves in advance. Moran.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
(2,046 posts)DFW
(60,210 posts)Bigger Better Bunker Busters
marble falls
(71,950 posts)BootinUp
(51,331 posts)you could throw at them?
Melon
(1,526 posts)We dont even have troops on the ground.
ecstatic
(35,075 posts)For starters, it would have required tRump not leaking alleged US- Iran war plans a couple years back. Iran probably had their plan in place for years now. But in case Iran didn't have a long-term plan in place, tRump made sure that they would be prepared by blasting warnings all over social media before the strike.
And honestly, it's not clear to me whether this is more incompetence or more corruption. tRump has a lot of financial ties to the Middle East. A lot of money on the line.
Metaphorical
(2,635 posts)Iran is, much like Pakistan and Afghanistan, very heavily mountainous (they are all part of the Zagros mountain range, just south of the Caucasus mountains). Bunker busters are intended for deep hardened manmade structures, but the Iranian enrichment facilities are likely hundreds of meters deep, and even a small nuke would likely have trouble penetrating that. I'm sure there likely was SOME damage, but as far as I can tell it was for the most part just a very bright fireworks show.
Girard442
(6,887 posts)I mean, it's never been seen to work on an actual bunker, but it has the name, so it's gotta be.
Right?
Vinca
(54,002 posts)I also wonder how much we paid the defense industry to make 30,000 lb. "bunker buster" bombs that don't bust bunkers. Just round it up to the nearest billion and let us know.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,956 posts)CNN satellite analysis and Alma Research findings show Irans underground tunnel cities, with internal rail systems that move missiles to blast-door exits, have survived the bombing campaign largely intact. The geology, analysts say, is the real defense.
Link to tweet
https://www.thestatesman.com/world/iran-underground-missile-railway-tunnel-us-israel-strikes-operation-epic-fury-1503573121.html
Irans underground missile programme is not a recent improvisation. Reports that emerged as far back as 2020 claimed an automated railway system running through cavernous tunnels, transporting ballistic missiles between assembly halls, storage vaults, and blast-door exits. What is becoming clearer now, as Operation Epic Fury enters its fourth week, is the scale of what was built and the limits of what air power alone can do against it.....
The central constraint is geological, and it has now been publicly stated by Iran itself. Former IRGC Aerospace Force commander Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh said that Iran built its missile bases across provinces and cities at a depth of 500 metres.
The most powerful weapon the United States has for destroying hardened underground targets is the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator a 30,000-pound bomb built specifically for this purpose. It can penetrate approximately 60 metres of reinforced concrete or roughly 40 metres of moderate rock. Granite is harder than moderate rock. Five hundred metres is more than twelve times the weapons maximum penetration depth. The gap between the bomb and the tunnel is not a margin of error.....
IRGC did not prepare for this war by building rockets. It prepared by building railways inside mountains. The rockets are replaceable. The railways are permanent. And the granite that protects them was formed before mammals existed. The strait is 21 miles wide. The mountain is 500 metres deep. And the railway inside it is still delivering missiles to the surface, he added.
Link to tweet
Iran has continued to fire ballistic missiles throughout Operation Epic Fury, including the attempted strike on the joint US-UK base at Diego Garcia. Trump has said the operation is running weeks ahead of schedule and that Irans military is finished. The satellite imagery and the institutional assessments tell a more complicated story: one in which the visible war, fought above ground, has made genuine progress, and the invisible war, fought half a kilometre underground, has barely begun.
There is a reason why only one-third of Iran's missiles have been destroyed. Iran has been preparing for these attacks for decades. Iran's missile facilities are beyond reach of bunker buster bombs and there is no practical way without a very large number of troops to take out these missies.

