HERE ARE THE DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED TO TABLE AL GREEN'S IMPEACHMENT RESOLUTION

[orangecrush]

TRUMP WILL USE THIS.


For your viewing pleasure.

We can't even get a symbolic show of unity.


"Al Green introduced articles of impeachment today. This vote technically wasn’t for impeachment itself, but whether or not to vote on it at all. There are some surprising names on here which makes me think there may be some sort of strategy in tabling it for now, but regardless, here they are if you want to call your reps about it

These are the democrats who voted to table it—

Alabama: Shomari Figures, Terri Sewell

Arizona: Greg Stanton

California: Pete Aguilar, Ami Bera, Julia Brownley, Salud Carbajal, J. Luis Correa, Jim Costa, Adam Gray, Josh Harder, Ro Khanna, Mike Levin, Sam Liccardo, Ted Lieu, Zoe Lofgren, Jimmy Panetta, Nancy Pelosi, Scott Peters, Derek Tran, Juan Vargas, George Whitesides

Colorado: Jason Crow, Joe Neguse, Brittany Petterson

Connecticut: Joe Courtney, Rosa DeLauro, James Himes, John Larson

Delaware: Sarah McBride

Florida: Kathy Castor, Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, Lois Frankel, Jared Moskowitz, Darren Soto, Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Georgia: Sanford Bishop, Lucy McBath

Hawaii: Ed Case

Illinois: Nikki Budzinski, Sean Casten, Bill Foster, Mike Quigley, Bradley Scott Schneider, Eric Sorenson, Lauren Underwood

Indiana: Andre Carson, Frank Mrvan

Kansas: Sharice Davids

Kentucky: Morgan McGarvey

Louisiana: Cleo Fields

Maine: Jared Golden

Maryland: Sarah Elfreth, Steny Hoyer, April McClain Delaney, Kweisi Mfume, Johnny Olszewski, Jamie Raskin

Massachusetts: Jake Auchincloss, Katherine Clark, William Keating, Stephen Lynch, Seth Moulton, Richard Neal, Lori Trahan

Michigan: Debbie Dingell, Kristen McDonald Rivet, Hillary Scholten, Haley Stevens

Minnesota: Angie Craig, Betty McCollum, Kelly Morrison

Missouri: Wesley Bell, Emanuel Cleaver

Nevada: Steven Horsford, Susie Lee

New Hampshire: Maggie Goodlander, Chris Pappas

New Jersey: Herbert Conaway, Josh Gottheimer, Frank Pallone, Nellie Pou

New Mexico: Gabe Vasquez

New York: Laura Gillen, Daniel Goldman, Hakeem Jeffries, Timothy Kennedy, George Latimer, John Mannion, Gregory Meeks, Grace Meng, Joseph Morelle, Josh Riley, Patrick Ryan, Thomas Suozzi, Paul Tonko, Ritchie Torres

North Carolina: Donald Davis, Deborah Ross

Ohio: Marcy Kaptur, Greg Landsman, Emilia Sykes

Oregon: Janelle Bynum, Val Hoyle, Andrea Salinas

Pennsylvania: Madeleine Dean, Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan, Mary Gay Scanlon

Rhode Island: Gabe Amo, Seth Magaziner

South Carolina: James Clyburn

Texas: Henry Cuellar, Lizzie Fletcher, Vicente Gonzalez, Julie Johnson, Marc Veasey

Virginia: Donald Beyer, Jennifer McClellan, Robert Scott, Suhas Subramanyam, Eugene Vindman

Washington: Suzan DelBene, Rick Larsen, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, Kim Schrier, Adam Smith, Marilyn Strickland"

https://www.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1ljkt9j/democrats_who_voted_against_impeachment_today/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

[Fiendish Thingy]

1. Hopefully, there will be more courage once Dems regain the majority in 2026. Nt

[Autumn]

4. Rest assured. Should Democrats regain the majority in 2026, impeachment

will be off the table.

[maxsolomon]

19. Rest assured, CONVICTION will be off the table.

Dems will not control the Senate in 2027.

[Autumn]

33. Of course there won't be a conviction. Even if Dems controled the Senate

and the House impeachment would be off the table.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

46. We are 6 Reps short in the House. 22 short in the Senate.

[Autumn]

69. Yeah the point is, if we held the majority in both impeachment would still be off the table.

[travelingthrulife]

31. Yup. Gonna say that in my best Nancy Pelosi voice.

[mvd]

2. Yep, some really surprising names

Jeffries, Khanna, impeachment managers like Raskin and my representative Dean.. must be something to this.

[orangecrush]

7. ...

[mvd]

23. I'm strongly for impeachment

TSF has been committing impeachable crimes since day one. If those names voted against impeachment due to not seeing the point, then we have even more serious problems.

[orangecrush]

25. Every Democrat should have voted yes

[stillcool]

15. point fingers and vilify first

It's a game. Don't know what was involved in this particular legislation. Don't know if they see a better way? Don't know anything. But the finger pointers are so smart. Look, look over here!!! Spineless! Primary! Do they even elect Democrats?

Rep. Al Green invoked Rule IX to force every single Representative to vote.
House leadership opted to vote not on the articles themselves, but on a motion to table the Resolution, which further delays impeachment proceedings.
Tabling this means that no impeachment will happen right now.

[angrychair]

24. None have offered an explanation

Voting to table the bill is not a good look. Even if it was symbolic vote for the bill anyway. All this does is make people mad.

[stillcool]

39. for you it's about 'looks'

For them it might be about something else...like 'work'. I suppose there are people only interested in that, but there actually are people whose job it is to represent the people of their state. Not play a part but do a job. Don't know what that bill was comprised of, and if some may feel another time would be more beneficial, or something about the language? Who knows? Has zero to do with anything. My Representative voted to table it. I am completely okay with his decision-making process and will not be contacting him. Why is it people just don't go to the source for explanations? Spines and primaries are all theatrics too.

[angrychair]

50. I've made dozens of calls

To representatives offices trying to ask questions or get feedback and I've never heard a peep. It would be more effective for me to stand in the back yard and scream at the trees.

At this particular moment symbolism is all we have. We can do nothing else. People are tired of speeches and letters of concern. The push back at committee hearings are good as well.

While the vote may not do anything people need hope and they need to believe that Democrats in Washington are fighting this insanity through every possible avenue.

[stillcool]

56. I've been represented by Democrats

for my entire life, except for a one-time seat-filler and have no business being on this site. I've been friendly with my state representatives and have lived in several districts. I actually switched parties to independent after the Iraq War vote but switched back before the next election because I volunteered for Barack Obama's campaign. There is so much that has led us to where we are, and it is not Democrats. It's human beings of which I am one. I'm sorry for my stupid need to defend, I need to ignore.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

48. Every day, there's at least 1 post here urging people to vote against Dems.

Now is NOT the time to vote against ANY Dem who can win. We are in an emergency situation.

[ImNotGod]

60. The problem isn't voting against, the problem will be not bothering to vote at all

the party needs to show a spine, commit to going against fascism any chance they get or hem and haw and put future voters to sleep.

[W_HAMILTON]

22. The "something" is that this was a motion to table and NOT a vote on impeachment.

[bdamomma]

42. my Reps

from RI on this list too. Yes, something to this, i agree.

[customerserviceguy]

3. What are we going to do

primary them, and end up with a lot of those seats going to the Rethuglicans? Yes, we want him out of there, but apparently, now is not the time.

[lostincalifornia]

5. and the votes to convict in the Senate aren't there.

[orangecrush]

9. ...

[lostincalifornia]

11. It has nothing to do with being timidity.

[angrychair]

27. It has everything to do with it

Even if symbolic at least Democrats are asserting themselves and taking a public stand.
To take a vote to table it just stirs up controversy like this

[Rebl2]

13. Exactly

[travelingthrulife]

30. They still have the job to do. They are faced with crimes. To do nothing is enabling the crimes.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

51. you need 67 Senators to vote for impeachment we have 45 Senators plus 2 independents.

[lostincalifornia]

55. To convict in the Senate. The votes aren't there, and the odds are with a republican majority in the house

it would never get to the Senate.

[orangecrush]

8. ...

[Rebl2]

12. True

I live in a red state that would endanger democratic seats.

[orangecrush]

20. What good are seats

If you aren't doing anything with them

[Autumn]

34. Holding their seats makes damn sure they get their perks.

[orangecrush]

36. After watching the video of the father of 3 Marines getting his brains beat out

By ICE's hired thugs, this really pisses me off.

[orangecrush]

17. YES, WE MUST KEEP OUR POWDER DRY

[travelingthrulife]

29. Forever and ever...and then people will squeal that Democrats do nothing to stop this mess.

[orangecrush]

35. Yup

[Abnredleg]

6. Impeachment will cause MAGA to close ranks

And Independents will see it as a stunt because it has no chance of passing. Dems have enough issues to attack him so let’s focus on those instead of wasting political bandwidth.

[Shellback Squid]

10. I agree, they are busy hurting themselves right now

[Oopsie Daisy]

14. Good for them! They live in the real world and understand that these types of things are a waste of time.

They understand that the Democrats do not control the levers of power and that this would NEVER go anywhere with the GOP in charge.

I applaud them and support their efforts.

[travelingthrulife]

28. It is their JOB to do it. History will not be kind to a Congress who did nothing in the

face of developing fascism.

When people complain about Democrats being worthless and doing nothing, I will remember this.

[Kaleva]

38. And yet you will continue to support Democrats

Like everyone else here

[Oopsie Daisy]

47. Oh no... "history will not be kind"... please. Spare me.

Last edited Tue Jun 24, 2025, 08:14 PM - Edit history (1)

>> When people complain about Democrats being worthless and doing nothing, I will remember this.
What you should remember is that the Democrats are not in charge and the Democrats do not have the majority. These theatrical votes and handwringing are ALWAYS going to fail. Failure after failure makes us look weak. Let's focus on what's POSSIBLE rather than chasing this fantasy.

True leadership transcends those types of theatrics. Authentic leadership is demonstrated through composure, reason, and a steadfast commitment to progress. The substance of one's actions speaks volumes louder than any theatrical displays. Let's raise the bar and focus on what truly moves us forward. I'm glad to see that more Democrats agree with me on this.

[ananda]

16. Except of course that this despotism is far from calm.

All I'm seeing is chaos, harm, and insanity.

[orangecrush]

18. Got that right

[no_hypocrisy]

21. NJ: Gottheimer, no surprise.

Nellie Pou surprises me. She took
Bill Pascrell’s seat and I know the district would have supported her.

[travelingthrulife]

26. Cowards. All of them.

[Mountainguy]

41. And the benefit of voting nay?

Feels?

[Clouds Passing]

32. Gabe, Gabe, Gabe look to Melanie Stansbury as a fine Congressional example

[Rob H.]

37. AIPAC and other pro-Israel donors invested their money well nt

[Paladin]

40. Oh, yeah. As if timid, chickenshit Democrats are going to make a difference.

Last edited Tue Jun 24, 2025, 06:25 PM - Edit history (1)

trump and his constant fuckups and his brain-dead cabinet selections are basically giving the country back to us---but only if we have the courage and intelligence to seize the moment. What a profound disappointment these Democrats are.

Al Green: keep on doing what you're doing. Over and over.

[orangecrush]

44. It's disheartening to see this.

There is no excuse for this.

[spanone]

43. What the fucking fuck?

[orangecrush]

53. Triple that.

[Oppaloopa]

45. Omg

I can't believe it nancypelosi. Debbie Wasserman what were they thinking ? We are always to nice

[rubbersole]

49. Jeffries, Raskin, Goldman...

..there is a good reason to vote the way they did. We'll find out soon. Personally, I think Raskin is the man when it comes to resistance to the gop treason.

[orangecrush]

54. Please give me one possible reason.

[rubbersole]

74. I have no idea.

Hoping one of the reps gets to explain this soon. I thought it would be on Chris Hayes and it wasn't. The fact so many Dems voted against it knowing how angry their constitutes are at the repubs...well, here's the blowback they had to know was coming.

[electric_blue68]

66. I agree esp seeing Raskin on the list. (my post #64)

And not necessarily the "self serving, or cowardness" one.

Yes, it is somewhat disappointing to me, but I will wait, and see.
And I do believe in symbolism as well.

[Jose Garcia]

52. 128 Democrats voted to table, 79 against

https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2025175

[DinahMoeHum]

57. Now, please give us a list of the 67 US Senators. . .

. . .who will vote to CONVICT Trump if there is another impeachment.

Go ahead. I'll wait.

[orangecrush]

58. So everyone should roll over and play dead

Are you telling me they're scared of losing votes because voters will think they will impeach and remove if we get the majority back in Congress?

I've heard that lame excuse already.

If the shoe were on the other foot, you could be damn sure the Republicans would have voted unanimously to impeach.

A show of solidarity might have had an effect

The effect this has is enabling and emboldening him.

[DinahMoeHum]

61. No, I'm saying STOP TILTING AT THIS WINDMILL. . .

. . .and don't waste any more time or bandwidth on it. Please.

Impeachment don't mean shit if there's no conviction and removal by the US Senate.

There are bigger fish to fry right now (such as killing the Big Bullshit Bill)

[orangecrush]

63. Ha!

[url=https://ibb.co/20f3xSJd][img][/img][/url]

[DinahMoeHum]

67. Still waiting for that list of 67 US Senators. . .

n/t

[orangecrush]

68. Showing solidarity

in the face of a despot is not an exercise in futility, no matter what the "Senate" does.

Just my take

It doesn't matter what a senator thinks to me.

What matters is showing me that when we are on the streets marching, Democrats have our backs.

That is NOT what this showed me, and I believe the majority of Democrats feel the same way.

[electric_blue68]

64. It's not necessarily "rolling over, and playing dead". There may be reasons someone like

Rep Jamie Raskin, previous impeachment manager, and Constitutional Scholar voted to table it at this moment. I trust his judgement.

I dream of drumphf being "dragged kicking, and screaming" out of The WH, or "Mother Nature" finally taking her course. So don't get me wrong.

[iemanja]

59. What he'll use is the fact Democrats tried to impeach him again

and it's an empty exercise since they don't even have the votes.

[Bread and Circuses]

62. Disappointed

NOTE- This is not bashing

Hopes that after the bombing there would be more “esprit de corps “ with the people and our peaceful visibity events. I no longer have words. I understand that there is zero chance. Perhaps, there’s another strategy, as you suggest? I continue to support the Dems. I know this is chaos for them, hope they know that we’re still here, waiting and weary.

[Greg_In_SF]

65. Again, this was settled in court

following Obama's bombing of Libya.

There is NO advance warning that needs to be given to Congress.

The Commander In Chief is to notify Congress within 48 hours AFTER an attack.

There is no impeachable offense here and those who voted against it did the right thing.

[orangecrush]

72. "Voting against impeaching Trump is doing the right thing"

For MAGATs.

[Samael13]

70. I get the want for a symbolic stand

Let's be honest tho it would go nowhere and just play into the MAGA martyr syndrome around trump. Better to not give them ammo and actually focus on ways to get congress back and solutions to stop him until democrats get back into the majority.

[Ping Tung]

71. As expected, my newly elected (D) rep voted with the Trumpettes,,,,,,yet again. .

Her (R) predecessor was more likely to vote against him.

[Ilikepurple]

73. The number of "dems have no power why waste it on this" comments is alarming?

I agree that there was no way impeachment was going to happen even if not table, but what I don’t understand is why that result is necessary for success. I believe that messaging and counter propaganda is the only real weapons the democrats have for the time being. This may have provided an opportunity to get more media coverage of this administrations missteps. Trump has been shown to cave under pressure from special interests and from public pressure. Why not apply some? This result just gives the media a chance to spin this as “most democrats don’t believe Trump has done anything impeachable.”

Why are many the law and order types here all of a sudden dropping strict adherence to the constitution, laws, and rules in favor of more pragmatic concerns? If Trump has done anything impeachable, it is our lawmakers’ attempt to have hearings about this matter.

If you are a pragmatist and believe the democrats don’t control any of the levers of power, why are you so concerned with their time wasted? Are you expecting bipartisan cooperation? Wasted Democratic Party time also equals wasted Republican Party time. Also, I’m guessing putting some pressure on the weaker members of the Republican House would not be an altogether bad thing? The endgame does not have to be impeachment itself.

Also, I believe we should carefully consider what the Democratic Party leadership has strategized, but I also believe this ceases to be a forum if we acquiesce to their every decision in some misguided appeal to their authority.

[Liberal In Texas]

75. My House member is one of them.

I gave her what for on her Bluesky page.