Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tblue37

(68,449 posts)
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 09:07 AM Jul 2025

'So wrong': Texas data reveals soaring number of near-deaths after miscarriage

Before states banned abortion, one of the gravest outcomes of early miscarriage could easily be avoided: Doctors could offer a dilation and curettage procedure, which quickly empties the uterus and allows it to close, protecting against a life-threatening hemorrhage. But because the procedures, known as D&Cs, are also used to end pregnancies, they have gotten tangled up in state legislation that restricts abortion. Reports now abound of doctors hesitating to provide them and women who are bleeding heavily being discharged from emergency rooms without care, only to return in such dire condition that they need blood transfusions to survive. As ProPublica reported last year, one woman died of hemorrhage after 10 hours in a Houston hospital that didn’t perform the procedure.

Now, a new ProPublica data analysis adds empirical weight to the mounting evidence that abortion bans have made the common experience of miscarriage — which occurs in up to 30% of pregnancies — far more dangerous. It is based on hospital discharge data from Texas, the largest state to ban abortion, and captures emergency department visits from 2017 to 2023, the most recent year available.

After Texas made performing abortions a felony in August 2022, ProPublica found, the number of blood transfusions during emergency room visits for first-trimester miscarriage shot up by 54%.

The number of emergency room visits for early miscarriage also rose, by 25%, compared with the three years before the COVID-19 pandemic — a sign that women who didn’t receive D&Cs initially may be returning to hospitals in worse condition, more than a dozen experts told ProPublica.

Snip

Much more:
https://www.rawstory.com/a-striking-trend-after-texas-banned-abortion-more-women-nearly-bled-to/
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'So wrong': Texas data reveals soaring number of near-deaths after miscarriage (Original Post) tblue37 Jul 2025 OP
Since the state doesn't care about their lives, these women should sue for all their medical expenses & trauma suffered. CrispyQ Jul 2025 #1
not a bug. a feature. mopinko Jul 2025 #2
It's far worse than the days pre-roe (from my memory) at least in those days walkingman Jul 2025 #3
yeah. back in the day, they treated miscarriages mopinko Jul 2025 #5
K&R Solly Mack Jul 2025 #4
Adding the link to the original ProPublica story. erronis Jul 2025 #6
Thanks. tblue37 Jul 2025 #7
"Pro-life" isn't about babies. It's about punishing women who don't want to have babies. Ping Tung Jul 2025 #8
People who are against abortion rights are NEVER DFW Jul 2025 #9

CrispyQ

(41,101 posts)
1. Since the state doesn't care about their lives, these women should sue for all their medical expenses & trauma suffered.
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 09:19 AM
Jul 2025

The woman who died but they kept on life support so they could harvest the fetus, her family should sue. WTF? The state forces all this extra debt & trauma on people with no repercussions at all? It's gotten to where I hate republicans. All of them. Every single one of them.

mopinko

(73,940 posts)
2. not a bug. a feature.
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 09:23 AM
Jul 2025

EVERYONE knew this wd happen. considering that we r ruled by old farts, most who voted for this were alive pre-roe.

walkingman

(11,160 posts)
3. It's far worse than the days pre-roe (from my memory) at least in those days
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 09:34 AM
Jul 2025

the Doctors were not intimidated for trying to save lives like they are these days here in Texas. I don't see how they attract OB/GYN doctors in this state?

mopinko

(73,940 posts)
5. yeah. back in the day, they treated miscarriages
Tue Jul 1, 2025, 10:02 AM
Jul 2025

like the life threatening emergencies they r. and the abortion pill is a game changer.
public hospitals all used to have ‘abortion wards’. not many r resorting to coat hangers or back alley butchers these days, afaik. the 1 at cook co hospital was well known for the absolute stench. private hospitals, of course, didnt have them.
and if u were wealthy enough, u cd get a d&c from a doc who pretended u were miscarrying. even in catholic hospitals.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'So wrong': Texas data re...