Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*** Breaking ***Verdict Reached In Diddy Case. Guilty On Lesser Charges. (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2025 OP
The media will pay more attention to the verdict than they will Tribetime Jul 2025 #1
Watching the fall of this creep as entertainment, unfortunately this MEDIA guided since I have no power on that front. Brainfodder Jul 2025 #5
Guilty on two out of five charges Emile Jul 2025 #2
You can't spell, murielm99 Jul 2025 #3
to whom are you replying? WhiteTara Jul 2025 #29
Original post. murielm99 Jul 2025 #37
what was the misspelling? WhiteTara Jul 2025 #42
I don't want to embarrass them. murielm99 Jul 2025 #45
SMH DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2025 #46
In DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2025 #47
All is forgiven WhiteTara Jul 2025 #48
Thank you. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2025 #50
forgiveness is mine WhiteTara Jul 2025 #51
Link Passages Jul 2025 #4
He can still have freaky sex parties in prison milestogo Jul 2025 #6
looks like his lifestyle will carry on, outside prison. WhiteTara Jul 2025 #49
Convicted on 2 counts Acquitted on 3 Johnny2X2X Jul 2025 #7
Not Guilty on Sex Trafficking of Casandra Ventura Prairie Gates Jul 2025 #8
Obviously it pays to be rich Arazi Jul 2025 #9
Exactly. I suspect a less privileged person of color Heidi Jul 2025 #11
Highly unlikely. A less privileged person of color would almost certainly never have been charged with Racketeering Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #13
Maybe because they couldn't afford to boss a group of 'assistants' Sparkly Jul 2025 #14
By all accounts, they didn't convince anybody in the courtroom including the Jury that there was Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #16
And that is a shame. Sparkly Jul 2025 #18
Combs is a truly horrible, despicable human being. Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #23
And OJ was never going to be convicted Sparkly Jul 2025 #28
First result of a very quick Google search; Heidi Jul 2025 #17
I didn't claim otherwise. Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #20
I apologize for misunderstanding. Heidi Jul 2025 #22
The evidence was in front of our eyes. Sparkly Jul 2025 #27
And, people still don't believe women. Sparkly Jul 2025 #12
And there are specific subsets of women Heidi Jul 2025 #19
Billionaire justice TheProle Jul 2025 #31
Doesn't look like he's going to prison BannonsLiver Jul 2025 #10
He may get off with time served. murielm99 Jul 2025 #21
What's more disgusting: 1st time offense; celebrity break; richie rich "justice"? UTUSN Jul 2025 #15
Guilty on two counts... OmegaX Jul 2025 #24
It was a terrible decision. Sparkly Jul 2025 #26
Granted... OmegaX Jul 2025 #30
Blame the prosecution MakeThemCry Jul 2025 #34
Question? Was there some offense lesser than Sex Trafficking that they could have charged him with Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #36
The facts did speak for themselves Sparkly Jul 2025 #38
Why does it seem angrychair Jul 2025 #40
Good question. Sparkly Jul 2025 #44
He should get zero jail time Buckeyeblue Jul 2025 #25
Apparently... TheProle Jul 2025 #32
Yep angrychair Jul 2025 #41
But he wasn't convicted of that Buckeyeblue Jul 2025 #52
Exactly my point angrychair Jul 2025 #53
Yep MakeThemCry Jul 2025 #33
I just heard a point which I had forgotten about - but I think is dead on. Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #35
And put him on staff MorbidButterflyTat Jul 2025 #43
Don't worry. moondust Jul 2025 #39

Tribetime

(7,145 posts)
1. The media will pay more attention to the verdict than they will
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:19 AM
Jul 2025

Tens of millions of people losing their health , care and dying

Brainfodder

(7,781 posts)
5. Watching the fall of this creep as entertainment, unfortunately this MEDIA guided since I have no power on that front.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:25 AM
Jul 2025

I do wonder why Fox News, the locations where the poison is created, doesn't experience more issues of the negative kind a lot more often?

murielm99

(33,095 posts)
37. Original post.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 03:21 PM
Jul 2025

I thought it was some sort of snark. It seemed too soon for a verdict. And the spelling was wrong. So I am the one guilty of snark.

WhiteTara

(31,279 posts)
42. what was the misspelling?
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 05:40 PM
Jul 2025

they must have cleaned it up by the time I got there.

But the verdict made me sick to my stomach.

murielm99

(33,095 posts)
45. I don't want to embarrass them.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 07:05 PM
Jul 2025

I will tell you privately. The verdict made me sick, too. It should make any woman sick.

DemocratSinceBirth

(102,013 posts)
46. SMH
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 07:22 PM
Jul 2025

I added an l to moral because this board sticks. I can get a glass of water in the time it takes for my thread to appear. I'm pretty sure I can spell moral. It's pretty rude to imply I can't spell a word we learn how to spell in grade school. I will be the bigger poster, take the high road, and not respond in kind.

DemocratSinceBirth

(102,013 posts)
47. In
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 08:36 PM
Jul 2025

In between my haste to break the news and this board sticking, especially when starting threads, I added an l to moral. Mea culpa. Maybe I should commit seppuku.

Prairie Gates

(8,479 posts)
8. Not Guilty on Sex Trafficking of Casandra Ventura
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:30 AM
Jul 2025


The Racketeering Conspiracy was always an overreach charge.

Heidi

(58,846 posts)
11. Exactly. I suspect a less privileged person of color
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:46 AM
Jul 2025

(even if innocent) would have been found guilty on all counts.

Wiz Imp

(10,448 posts)
13. Highly unlikely. A less privileged person of color would almost certainly never have been charged with Racketeering
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:01 AM
Jul 2025

and Sex Trafficking. Classic case of over charging and I think they did it to make an example of a famous person that everyone already knew was a scumbag. They thought that would be enough to get the charges to stick.

Sparkly

(24,938 posts)
14. Maybe because they couldn't afford to boss a group of 'assistants'
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:04 AM
Jul 2025

in a pattern of criminal activity. I don't think it was overcharging at all.

Wiz Imp

(10,448 posts)
16. By all accounts, they didn't convince anybody in the courtroom including the Jury that there was
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:11 AM
Jul 2025

any proof of sex trafficking and racketeering. That's the very definition of over charging. They never had a chance of getting guilty verdicts on those charges. The very short deliberation time makes it obvious that the jury didn't buy any of what the prosecution was selling on those charges.

Sparkly

(24,938 posts)
18. And that is a shame.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:17 AM
Jul 2025

Because it's clear there were force, fraud, and coercion as well as trafficking, with multiple witnesses and video evidence, and the fact that others were involved makes it racketeering.

Wiz Imp

(10,448 posts)
23. Combs is a truly horrible, despicable human being.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:32 AM
Jul 2025

I wish he could be sent to jail for life, but unfortunately it was never going to happen in this case.

Sparkly

(24,938 posts)
28. And OJ was never going to be convicted
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 01:01 PM
Jul 2025

and Trump was never going to be convicted in the Senate and a thousand other men were never going to be convicted so "oh well!"

Heidi

(58,846 posts)
17. First result of a very quick Google search;
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:14 AM
Jul 2025
https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/sandiego/press-releases/2014/north-park-gang-members-indicted-in-racketeering-conspiracy

Maybe they were guilty, maybe they weren’t, but POC with less privilege than Sean Combs certainly *are* charged with racketeering.

Wiz Imp

(10,448 posts)
20. I didn't claim otherwise.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:22 AM
Jul 2025

But based on all the accounts I've seen, based on the evidence presented, there was never any chance of getting a conviction on those charges.

Make no mistake, I wish they could put him in jail for life but it was never going to happen in this case.

Heidi

(58,846 posts)
22. I apologize for misunderstanding.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:29 AM
Jul 2025

I’m hot, pissed at the current state of our nation, and simultaneously navigating the whims of our two Maine Coons (one a polydactyl kitten who recently discovered that vertical liftoff is his super power).

Sparkly

(24,938 posts)
27. The evidence was in front of our eyes.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 12:59 PM
Jul 2025

All the evidence for trafficking was there, and the accomplices made it racketeering. The violence, threats of exposure of videos, financial coercion and shake-downs were all coercive. Paying for security video as a cover-up, bringing drugs and prostitutes in, sequestering his victims, threatening witnesses -- it was all there.

Heidi

(58,846 posts)
19. And there are specific subsets of women
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:18 AM
Jul 2025

who are especially not believed. 🤬😡🥺😢✊🏾

BannonsLiver

(20,862 posts)
10. Doesn't look like he's going to prison
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:37 AM
Jul 2025

And if he does it will be for far less time than it would have been had he been convicted on the more serious charges.

OmegaX

(51 posts)
24. Guilty on two counts...
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:49 AM
Jul 2025

...each of which carries a 10-year maximum. As a first-time offender, he's likely to get no more than a 2-3 year sentence for each, to run concurrently and with credit for 10 months already served, he'll probably be out in 18 months, if that.

A very diverse cross-section of 12 New Yorkers listened to all the evidence and arrived at 5 separate unanimous verdicts so like it or not, their decisions should be respected; win some, lose some, that's the way it goes...

Sparkly

(24,938 posts)
26. It was a terrible decision.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 12:52 PM
Jul 2025

Win some, lose some, and sometimes the jury doesn't know what they're doing. I honestly think the defense succeeds in confusing them.

OmegaX

(51 posts)
30. Granted...
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 01:10 PM
Jul 2025

...but it's the defense's job to "confuse" juries sufficiently enough for them to find enough reasonable doubt to render a verdict of not guilty. As the saying goes, "don't hate the player, hate the game"...

MakeThemCry

(39 posts)
34. Blame the prosecution
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 01:47 PM
Jul 2025

They clearly overcharge him. Clearly.

They started off doing nonsense, political theater.

The jurors saw all the evidence and came to the logical conclussion that Puffy was not guilty of what they were charging him with.

I hope they learn from this and don't seek to demonize a perp like this and let the facts speak for themselves.

Wiz Imp

(10,448 posts)
36. Question? Was there some offense lesser than Sex Trafficking that they could have charged him with
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 03:16 PM
Jul 2025

(beyond the transportation for prostitution charges which got guilty verdicts) but the prosecution chose not to because they went for the more serious charge? I am not remotely familiar with the the legalities or illegalities of the kind of activities He was into.

Sparkly

(24,938 posts)
38. The facts did speak for themselves
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 03:58 PM
Jul 2025

and he was guilty of exactly what he was charged with.

Sparkly

(24,938 posts)
44. Good question.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 06:18 PM
Jul 2025

Is the operative word the "billionaire," or the "men?"

They overlap so greatly, especially in cases like this, so...

I think it's about the "men." That seems to be the basis for decisions, and the takeaway message for the rest of society.

Buckeyeblue

(6,440 posts)
25. He should get zero jail time
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 12:29 PM
Jul 2025

He's not a good person. He treated women he was in a relationship with horribly. No defense.

But that's not what he was convicted of. Prostitution. Really?

If the feds had put half the effort into holding Trump accountable as they have trying to convict Combs of a half-baked RICO charge, I don't think we would be in this mess.

I realize there is no internal link between these two cases but I'm not in the mood to debate logically this morning.

angrychair

(12,545 posts)
41. Yep
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 05:31 PM
Jul 2025

As long as you completely ignore the multiple stories of sex abuse torture parties and conspiracy to hide, it's an easy case to win.

angrychair

(12,545 posts)
53. Exactly my point
Thu Jul 3, 2025, 01:19 AM
Jul 2025

OJ was never convicted of murder but there is no doubt he did it or at the very least was involved.

Wiz Imp

(10,448 posts)
35. I just heard a point which I had forgotten about - but I think is dead on.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 03:05 PM
Jul 2025

Ultimately, the verdict in this case was likely irrelevant because Donald Trump is almost certainly going to pardon him.

moondust

(21,354 posts)
39. Don't worry.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 04:49 PM
Jul 2025

He'll still be a convicted "celebrity" felon with sexual charges so he'll still be qualified to replace the current "celebrity" felon at the top of the GQP ticket.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*** Breaking ***Verdict R...