After all the damage

[I_UndergroundPanther]

The Republican Party should be forced to disband after all the shit they have done to harm the people.

Their attempts to destroy the constitution and being chums with racists and domestic terrorists both rich and poor shows they betray this country they’re insurrectionists and traitors.

We don’t need a party of treacherous evil old men, young hateful fascists , sick religious nutbags with control issues and narcissists/ psychopaths.

We should actively do what we can to destroy the Republican Party and end thier existance in politics.

[Greg_In_SF]

1. How would that

be accomplished without bloodshed?

[I_UndergroundPanther]

6. Well

It may take blood to be shed to stop entrenched fascists . It might not.

Either way we don’t need a narcissist/ psychopath criminal party causing harm to our country and people.

[Greg_In_SF]

7. That would

basically be a civil war to rid us of our political opposition.

What if we lose?

[TommyT139]

9. "What if we lose" is the threshold that anyone faces.

This Friday, July 4th, is a reminder that the day we now celebrate was a point of no return for the people who signed the Declaration, the people who dumped the tea, the people who watched the comings and goings of British troops and ships and passed that info on in secret -- all knowing that they were risking everything for an unknown future.


Aoso, I disagree with your characterization of Republicans as "political opposition." They left that civilized arrangement years ago.

[Greg_In_SF]

17. Well, they are a

political organization that I oppose so I'll stick with it.

[Initech]

2. We don't need dictators or state run TV or concentration camps or ICE in the land of the free.

[I_UndergroundPanther]

5. Agree

This is why we don’t need conservatives.

[CTyankee]

3. How do we do that?

[I_UndergroundPanther]

4. I don't know

Republicans have been nothing but a criminal treacherous new deal hating closet/ outright fascist group. Do we really want a fascist party in the future always trying to take over the country and harming people?

After trump if there is another election rules need to be put onto conservatives so they can’t take over the country or harm others via policy .
That rule allows and will encourage a lot of these fascist fucks to get out of politics .

If we put controls on how money is used and must be disclosed in politics we can neuter the billionaires next time Dems get control.

We have to fascist proof this country the best we can somehow.

Demanding republicans do no harm will make a good chunk of them abandon politics. They like cruelty forcing people into poverty and making them suffer and die.

[ForgedCrank]

18. Who gets

to define what a fascist is?
What you are proposing is the same things that many are openly accusing them of.

[TheProle]

8. Easy Breezy - Repeal the First Amendment

done and done

[TnDem]

10. OK

I am assuming this is snark, correct?

[TheProle]

12. No.

Tell me how you ban a political party in the US without infringing on freedom of speech, assembly and association.

[TnDem]

13. OK, so...

Let me get this straight and I want to make sure I understand, because I am apparently confused.

You want to eliminate the first amendment to ban a political party? Am I understanding this correctly?

[TheProle]

14. Yeesh. No, the opposite.

[TnDem]

15. If you better explained yourself

Don't be afraid to type more.

I failed the mind reading class.

[TheProle]

19. Great feedback. Thanks.

[TommyT139]

11. Trump already acts like it doesn't exist.

ICE-jailed for an op-ed. Denied entry for having a meme on the phone. Shot with "non-lethal" projectiles for cursing or filming gestapo. Medical research funding edited because the word "diversity" or "gay" appears in the grant.

[ForgedCrank]

16. This sounds

an awful lot like a call for violence along with a demand for single party rule.
You sure about this?

[I_UndergroundPanther]

20. Not one party rule

But different parties with rules and laws to stop the shit that is conservative

[ForgedCrank]

21. Ok I

think I'm understanding you now.
You want the ideals that you disagree with to be outlawed so the people who do it can be arrested.

Outlawing "shit that is conservative" is a method employed by others throughout history. Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro, just to name a few.
I don't believe you are thinking this one through very well.