Is the New York Times trying to wreck Zohran Mamdani's mayoral bid? -- Margaret Sullivan

[erronis]

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jul/07/is-the-new-york-times-trying-to-wreck-zohran-mamdanis-mayoral-bid

With their made-up scandal, combined with the pre-election editorial, the Times looks like it’s on a crusade against Mamdani

A recent New York Times news story immediately drew fire from readers – and for very good reason.

Headlined “Mamdani Identified as Asian and African American on College Application,” the article centered on Zohran Mamdani, the candidate for New York City mayor who drew national attention recently with his stunning win in the Democratic primary election.

Its gist was that as a high school senior in New York City, Mamdani – who was born in Uganda and is of Indian descent – checked a couple of different boxes about race when applying for admission to Columbia University.

So what, you might ask. Why is this even a story, you might also ask.

. . .

The incident raises a larger issue: the Times’s apparent opposition to Mamdani’s candidacy.

On the opinion side of the paper, there’s little question about that. Even though the Times no longer makes endorsements for mayor, they published an editorial urging voters to avoid ranking Mamdani at all on their ballots because he was so unqualified. (New York City uses ranked-choice voting, which allows voters to list several candidates in order of preference.)

Remarkably, the Times stopped short of giving the same “don’t rank him” advice about disgraced governor Andrew Cuomo, who resigned his office in 2021 and then ran for mayor against Mamdani in the primary.

The opinion side of the Times is entitled to its opinion, however misguided. But straight news articles, by contrast, aren’t supposed to go to bat for or against candidates. They’re supposed to be neutral and non-partisan, not cheering on one candidate or kneecapping another.

In practice, of course, that’s often not the case.

With this made-up scandal, combined with the pre-election editorial, the Times looks like it’s on a crusade against Mamdani.

And no lofty explanation about the mission can disguise it.

[Climate Crusader]

1. I'm not a New Yorker, but I'm looking forward to this race.

I would finally like to see a critical discussion of "Democratic Socialism" without people diverting by screaming Communism.

I hope Mamdanni gets a fair hearing on the issues.

[regnaD kciN]

2. Is water wet? - Me

[Bev54]

3. Why yes, yes they are, just like they did to Hillary Clinton.

[LostOne4Ever]

4. The NYTs, despite it's reputation, is pretty right wing

Their constant hit pieces against trans people being a great example.