I guess that the reason why there aren't any criticisms of SCOTUS

[no_hypocrisy]

Last edited Sun Jul 13, 2025, 09:10 PM - Edit history (1)

decisions by legal scholars (with the exception of Lawrence Tribe, Glenn Kirschner, George Conway, etc.) is because if law professors and/or law review students were to publish such articles, the law schools would be threatened with accreditation by the White House.

[iemanja]

1. Unless you're talking about op-eds

or videos, publications take a fair bit of time. I would be very surprised if there weren’t legal scholars writing academic articles on this court.

[eppur_se_muova]

2. De-accreditation, I'm sure -- and you are right.

Turnip is already trying to take over the DC chapter of the Bar Association, by appointing a crony.

[BidenRocks]

3. Better

[in2herbs]

5. He lost in that attempt. The person selected got something like 90% of the votes.

[in2herbs]

4. I would guess they are in the background helping to write the lawsuits against the tfg administration. nt

[llmart]

6. Law schools aren't accredited by the president.

The ABA accredits law schools.

[no_hypocrisy]

7. I don't think that small detail would stop TSF.

[mdbl]

8. He's too stoooopid to realize that.

Thus all of his stupid statements.