Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mobeau69

(12,383 posts)
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 05:03 PM Jul 2025

No Josh, you gonna have to run with that mutherfucker.

Hawley introduced legislation to change his vote on the big ugly bill.

MSNBC


I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No Josh, you gonna have to run with that mutherfucker. (Original Post) mobeau69 Jul 2025 OP
That's not how this works, you dummy newdeal2 Jul 2025 #1
His polling must be really, really bad. mobeau69 Jul 2025 #2
Good Rebl2 Jul 2025 #19
Yep. How stupid not fooled Jul 2025 #35
This orangecrush Jul 2025 #37
I want to change my Presidential vote from Goldwater to LBJ COL Mustard Jul 2025 #28
Hey, Josh Hawley made the top half of his class possible. lastlib Jul 2025 #30
Sorry chickenhawk Hawley dweller Jul 2025 #3
He proficient at skedaddlin'... sprinkleeninow Jul 2025 #11
"proficient at skedaddlin'" orleans Jul 2025 #49
Hawley is more afraid of constituent blowback agingdem Jul 2025 #4
He wouldnt have voted for it, if that were the case quakerboy Jul 2025 #60
I have laughed & cried simultaneously. luvallpeeps Jul 2025 #5
Ha! EuterpeThelo Jul 2025 #10
🤔 Sounds too much like "crafting" to me. How anout - claffing? 🙂 electric_blue68 Jul 2025 #40
Can voters get a do-over on the 2024 election? sop Jul 2025 #6
Exactly Rebl2 Jul 2025 #20
I thought it was impossible for invertebrates to be any stupider. Basso8vb Jul 2025 #7
There is no bottom for the stupidity of the MAGAts. TomSlick Jul 2025 #34
K & R malaise Jul 2025 #8
You mean he actually sat down and read the bill? LuckyLib Jul 2025 #9
It was over 1100 pages coming out of the House. COL Mustard Jul 2025 #29
senators and representatives have staff that can read the whole thing drray23 Jul 2025 #41
But "not reading it" is not a legitimate excuse not fooled Jul 2025 #36
Wow that is some bullshit campaign. He is trying to play both sides, ineffectively. Bev54 Jul 2025 #12
Totally agree, he just wants to have his cake and eat it too nt blue_jay Jul 2025 #23
My thought too. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2025 #54
Is this real? senseandsensibility Jul 2025 #13
Re-Dude. GFY! czarjak Jul 2025 #14
That's my guy Just Jerome Jul 2025 #15
Is this for real? JustAnotherGen Jul 2025 #16
Bad polls Josh? BootinUp Jul 2025 #17
Performative bullshit is all this is--so he can claim he tried. live love laugh Jul 2025 #18
I finally understand what is meant by dflprincess Jul 2025 #21
And his voters may actually be stupid enough KPN Jul 2025 #22
How else could they have elected such a crooked politician? BComplex Jul 2025 #32
Changed his vote in what way? And how much of a change? calimary Jul 2025 #24
The title is misleading, here is what he is trying to do: Celerity Jul 2025 #42
Hey, it was a brief "headline" story. Basically the same difference though. mobeau69 Jul 2025 #45
No. Trying to do a very narrow rescission bill is not the same as going back ex post facto and saying he wants his Yea Celerity Jul 2025 #46
Same difference. mobeau69 Jul 2025 #50
No it is not at all. IF Hawley could (he cannot) somehow go back and ex post facto switch from Yea to Nay on the BBB, Celerity Jul 2025 #52
You're no fun at all. mobeau69 Jul 2025 #53
I can be a lot of fun, a whole lot. Celerity Jul 2025 #57
;-) mobeau69 Jul 2025 #64
Sorry Josh, Grandma is getting kicked out of Captain Zero Jul 2025 #51
That is not germane to my narrowly-focused replies. (BTW, I agree with your sentiment, it IS fair to put the blame Celerity Jul 2025 #55
Laugh hysterically... slightlv Jul 2025 #25
Laugh like Robert DiNero in Cape fear lol Javaman Jul 2025 #33
Gotta be honest, if the bill actually mitigates the damage, I'd support it. tinrobot Jul 2025 #26
Well, there certainly is that. calimary Jul 2025 #47
run run run - run away BoRaGard Jul 2025 #27
Too late EnergizedLib Jul 2025 #31
Well, his lord and master is famous for taking mulligans on the links . . . hatrack Jul 2025 #38
Ready-Fire-Aim (nt) Pinback Jul 2025 #39
what a fucking COWARD Skittles Jul 2025 #43
Can Josh run backwards? Blue Owl Jul 2025 #44
How about this - Trump and GOP gets there tax cuts, Hawley and maybe a Dem co-sponsor walkingman Jul 2025 #48
Well, Josh, you sure stepped in it this time. You TACO'd, dude! marble falls Jul 2025 #56
I'm just screaming into the chaos these motherfuckers are creating. lark Jul 2025 #58
The 'people of MO' voted him into office............ MyOwnPeace Jul 2025 #61
No "do-overs' Conjuay Jul 2025 #59
Josh Hawley is just SO unintentionally funny. thought crime Jul 2025 #62
Hawley humiliates the sane Missourians, (Democrats,) every time he opens his mouth or posts. HeartsCanHope Jul 2025 #63

not fooled

(6,687 posts)
35. Yep. How stupid
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:29 PM
Jul 2025

does he think his voters are? Probably shouldn't ask...but the answer must be "very, very stupid" for him to think a transparent ploy such as this would influence them.

COL Mustard

(8,230 posts)
28. I want to change my Presidential vote from Goldwater to LBJ
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 06:57 PM
Jul 2025

Oh wait I was only 6 years old. Never mind. I'll just change my vote for 1st Grade Class President that year.

Hawley is a moron if he thinks that will actually work. Or he's pandering to some part of his constituency. Who actually are morons, if they voted for him

dweller

(28,423 posts)
3. Sorry chickenhawk Hawley
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 05:09 PM
Jul 2025

Facing the wrath of your constituents ?
Now you can run again like you did Jan 6



✌🏻

agingdem

(8,857 posts)
4. Hawley is more afraid of constituent blowback
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 05:09 PM
Jul 2025

than he is of Trump threatening to primary him....

quakerboy

(14,869 posts)
60. He wouldnt have voted for it, if that were the case
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 04:12 PM
Jul 2025

Everything after the vote is posturing and publicity, meaning absolutely nothing.

And he really doesnt need to worry. Trump has his supersized supression force and the concentration camps funded, Voters who might go the wrong way can now be handled.

LuckyLib

(7,052 posts)
9. You mean he actually sat down and read the bill?
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 05:43 PM
Jul 2025

Sent out some minions to look at likely impact to his constituents? Smacked his forehead with his hand?

Good grief, the stupid is mind-boggling.

COL Mustard

(8,230 posts)
29. It was over 1100 pages coming out of the House.
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 06:58 PM
Jul 2025

No one read the whole thing. I read parts of it that applied to my work, but the rest of it? Nope. No time.

drray23

(8,787 posts)
41. senators and representatives have staff that can read the whole thing
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 09:22 PM
Jul 2025

They assign enough people to read sections and then summarize and report to their senator or rep. So, the excuse about not knowing what's in the bill does not really hold water.

not fooled

(6,687 posts)
36. But "not reading it" is not a legitimate excuse
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:32 PM
Jul 2025

Numerous experts reviewed the entire thing and explained the worst parts on air, many times, before he voted.

He could easily have informed himself. Actually, I believe he knew exactly what he was voting for. Effin' hypocrite.

BComplex

(9,917 posts)
32. How else could they have elected such a crooked politician?
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:08 PM
Jul 2025

Only as stupid as it takes to hang yourself while drinking kool-aid

calimary

(90,067 posts)
24. Changed his vote in what way? And how much of a change?
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 06:54 PM
Jul 2025

After-hour regrets after the dirty deed was done DO NOT COUNT.

Celerity

(54,448 posts)
42. The title is misleading, here is what he is trying to do:
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 09:27 PM
Jul 2025
Hawley seeks to repeal Medicaid cuts he voted for

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5402636-hawley-seeks-to-repeal-medicaid-cuts-he-voted-for/

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) wants to repeal parts of the “big, beautiful” law he just voted for.

Hawley on Tuesday introduced new legislation to roll back some of the Medicaid cuts that were included in the massive tax cut law, which passed the Senate two weeks ago and was signed into law by President Trump on July 4.

Hawley’s bill would repeal provisions that limit states’ ability to levy taxes on health providers to receive more money from the federal government. The bill also seeks to repeal a cap on state-directed payments, which allows states to direct how providers are paid by privately run managed care plans.

“Now is the time to prevent any future cuts to Medicaid from going into effect,” Hawley said in a statement. “I want to see Medicaid reductions stopped and rural hospitals fully funded permanently,” he added.

snip

Celerity

(54,448 posts)
46. No. Trying to do a very narrow rescission bill is not the same as going back ex post facto and saying he wants his Yea
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 10:46 PM
Jul 2025

switched to a Nay on the entire BBB package's final Senate vote.

Celerity

(54,448 posts)
52. No it is not at all. IF Hawley could (he cannot) somehow go back and ex post facto switch from Yea to Nay on the BBB,
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 08:02 AM
Jul 2025

and no other Rethug changed from Nay to Yea, the entire BBB would fail.

This rescission package is extremely narrow and has no effect on the vast, vast majority of the BBB.

The two are NOT the same thing, they just are not.

Also, Hawley agrees with most all of BBB, save for a few things. He certainly would not be the vote that killed the whole BBB.

Captain Zero

(8,907 posts)
51. Sorry Josh, Grandma is getting kicked out of
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 07:55 AM
Jul 2025

the nursing home. You have some space in the basement? Maybe set her up in a tent on a flood plain.

Celerity

(54,448 posts)
55. That is not germane to my narrowly-focused replies. (BTW, I agree with your sentiment, it IS fair to put the blame
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 08:10 AM
Jul 2025

Hawley and every Rethug you voted for the BBB).

slightlv

(7,790 posts)
25. Laugh hysterically...
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 06:55 PM
Jul 2025

changing a vote now means absolutely nothing, and he knows it. All it shows him to be is a flip flop idiot. What, he wasn't shown enough of the bill, being from MO, to know not to vote against it when it counted? Too bad. He's going to have to live with the results, and hopefully the people of MO know exactly what kind of "man" he is and will vote him out. One can dream. At least, I keep dreaming about people kicking out all these KS Brownback holdovers... seems no matter how hard I work against them, they keep getting back into office. (sigh)

tinrobot

(12,064 posts)
26. Gotta be honest, if the bill actually mitigates the damage, I'd support it.
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 06:56 PM
Jul 2025

A few of my friends will lose their health insurance if nothing changes.

calimary

(90,067 posts)
47. Well, there certainly is that.
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 12:08 AM
Jul 2025

Health insurance should be a RIGHT. NOT a privilege!!!

BoRaGard

(7,591 posts)
27. run run run - run away
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 06:56 PM
Jul 2025

ooooo o yah yah yah

run run run away

* to be sung to the tune of run run run away

hatrack

(64,909 posts)
38. Well, his lord and master is famous for taking mulligans on the links . . .
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:49 PM
Jul 2025

Why shouldn't The Littlest Senator emulate The Littlest President?

walkingman

(10,873 posts)
48. How about this - Trump and GOP gets there tax cuts, Hawley and maybe a Dem co-sponsor
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 12:33 AM
Jul 2025

removing the Medicaid cuts - probably would pass...get most Dem votes and lots of GOP votes...

Result - They get the tax cuts for billionaires, no one gets kicked off of Medicaid, rural Hospitals stay open...only bad result is about another TRILLION of debt is added to the deficit.

Then when our debt is downgraded and people begin whining about why they cannot get anything done in terms of social safety net - the powers that be will just point to our DEBT.

lark

(26,081 posts)
58. I'm just screaming into the chaos these motherfuckers are creating.
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 09:35 AM
Jul 2025

Hawley is a fool and a total asshat!! He could have killed the horrible hurt working class America as much as possible bill, but no, he voted for it so it's in effect - it's all him and I hope the people of MO get this message loud and clear!

MyOwnPeace

(17,568 posts)
61. The 'people of MO' voted him into office............
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 04:17 PM
Jul 2025

He was re-elected in 2024, years after seeing him run like a loud-mouthed chichenshit throuth the halls of the US Capitol.
Trust me - the people of MO will not abandon their 'We got ours but they will not get theirs" guy.......

thought crime

(1,576 posts)
62. Josh Hawley is just SO unintentionally funny.
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 04:23 PM
Jul 2025

I really miss Mitt Romney, but Hawley is a great fill-in. He's a Marjorie Taylor Greene for the more-sophisticated.

HeartsCanHope

(1,681 posts)
63. Hawley humiliates the sane Missourians, (Democrats,) every time he opens his mouth or posts.
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 04:57 PM
Jul 2025

I certainly have never voted for him! He is a despicable human being--cowardly, ridiculous, and so attention-seeking he can't do anything remotely humane without counting the clicks. Missouri is stuck with him until 2028! What a loser!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No Josh, you gonna have t...