Supreme Court Keeps Ruling in Trump's Favor, but Doesn't Say Why

[dalton99a]

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/16/us/politics/supreme-courts-shadow-docket.html

https://archive.ph/NAdAq

Supreme Court Keeps Ruling in Trump’s Favor, but Doesn’t Say Why
In a series of terse, unsigned orders, the court has often been giving the green light to President Trump’s agenda without a murmur of explanation.
By Adam Liptak
July 16, 2025 Updated 7:38 a.m. ET

In clearing the way for President Trump’s efforts to transform American government, the Supreme Court has issued a series of orders that often lacked a fundamental characteristic of most judicial work: an explanation of the court’s rationale.

On Monday, for instance, in letting Mr. Trump dismantle the Education Department, the majority’s unsigned order was a single four-sentence paragraph entirely devoted to the procedural mechanics of pausing a lower court’s ruling.

What the order did not include was any explanation of why the court had ruled as it did. It was an exercise of power, not reason.

The silence was even more striking in the face of a 19-page dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

“The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve,” Justice Sotomayor wrote, “but either way the threat to our Constitution’s separation of powers is grave.”

The question of whether the nation’s highest court owes the public an explanation for its actions has grown along with the rise of the “emergency docket,” which uses truncated procedures to produce terse provisional orders meant to remain in effect only while the courts consider the lawfulness of the challenged actions. In practice, the orders often effectively resolve the case.

The court has allowed the administration to fire tens of thousands of government workers, discharge transgender troops, end protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants from war-torn countries and fundamentally shift power from Congress to the president — often with scant or no explanation of how it arrived at those results.

...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trump: "Shut up and lick my ass"

Roberts: "Right away, Sir"

[newdeal2]

1. They are both corrupt and afraid of confrontation

If they rule against him, they know he will get to the point of ignoring them altogether. They prefer not to have a constitutional crisis on their watch, so they just bend the rules for him.

[no_hypocrisy]

2. Maybe to:

1. Allow a future SCOTUS to overturn their TSF decisions,

and/or

2. To discourage their rulings to be used strictly as precedent as there’s no reasoning to explain their rulings.

[spanone]

3. They are completely compromised.

[Midnight Writer]

4. Perhaps they will all have private jets by next term. Winnebagos are no longer enough to buy a vote.

Remember, in Trump World all relationships are transactional.

This is all part of some billionaire-funded think tanks' plan to destroy our public and government institutions so that the oligarchs can have unlimited power.

[UTUSN]

5. K&R

[Passages]

6. What's changed since 2015?

Jimmy Carter: U.S. Is an ‘Oligarchy With Unlimited Political Bribery’
The 39th president said the 'Citizens United' ruling 'violates the essence of what made America a great country in its political system'
By Daniel Kreps

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jimmy-carter-u-s-is-an-oligarchy-with-unlimited-political-bribery-63262/