Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAS14

(15,537 posts)
Sat Jul 19, 2025, 10:07 AM Jul 2025

Releasing the Epstein grand jusry testimony is nothing but a distraction.

It would have to go to court for months of wrangling, with the court very possibly/likely saying "no." Releasing the FBI files is another matter. They can do it if they want to. That's why they're talking about the grand jury testimony, not the FBI files.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Releasing the Epstein grand jusry testimony is nothing but a distraction. (Original Post) LAS14 Jul 2025 OP
It's all about protecting Trump. Emile Jul 2025 #1
Excellent point!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2025 #2
Bondi white washed the court proceedings so that's why he asking for the cleaned up version of the lies. lark Jul 2025 #3
Releasing testimony is one thing. Who's names are in then book is quite another. I smell more whitewash. Firestorm49 Jul 2025 #4
Agree. republianmushroom Jul 2025 #5
Those transcripts, which could take weeks to release, would constitute only a fraction of the evidence the FBI has. LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2025 #6
No one asked for the Grand Jury transcripts LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2025 #7

lark

(26,115 posts)
3. Bondi white washed the court proceedings so that's why he asking for the cleaned up version of the lies.
Sat Jul 19, 2025, 11:03 AM
Jul 2025

The verion that 100% doesn't mention trump because Bondi was protecting him. The FBI files probably weren't done by rw partisan rapist enablers for profit, so could be `100% more accuuratw and so will never be shown the light of day.

Firestorm49

(4,565 posts)
4. Releasing testimony is one thing. Who's names are in then book is quite another. I smell more whitewash.
Sat Jul 19, 2025, 11:06 AM
Jul 2025

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,068 posts)
6. Those transcripts, which could take weeks to release, would constitute only a fraction of the evidence the FBI has.
Sat Jul 19, 2025, 04:18 PM
Jul 2025

This is a stunt which would not include the vast majority of the file on Epstein. First, it is highly unlikely that the court will release these files given the appeal by Maxwell. The material in these transcripts are a very tiny part of the material in the FBI/DOJ possession.

This is a stunt to try to take pressure off trump.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/07/18/bondi-epstein-files-documents-grand-jury-testimony-doj/

The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal court to release grand jury transcripts connected to deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein, responding to a growing political outcry over the agency’s unfulfilled promise to release more details on the government’s investigation of his alleged sex-trafficking of minors......

A judge would have to agree to release them, a process that could take weeks or months. Even then, their disclosure is by no means certain. Grand jury records are shielded by secrecy rules to protect crime victims, witnesses and the accused, and are made public only under limited circumstances......

The sealed transcripts would constitute only a fraction of the evidence and investigative material that the FBI amassed during its years-long investigation. The transcripts are unlikely to fully satisfy Trump’s right-wing base, which continues to call for full transparency surrounding the investigation.

“It is generally a very, very small portion of any investigative file,” said Christopher O’Leary, who spent more than two decades as an FBI counterterrorism agent.

The full extent of what remains under wraps is unclear. Thousands of pages of documents related to the Epstein investigation have already been released through lawsuits, court filings, public records requests and the Justice Department’s prosecution of Maxwell......

As recently as last year, the younger Comey had sought in court to keep records pertaining to some aspects of the Epstein investigation under wraps in a suit brought by the gossip website Radar Online seeking FBI records. Comey pushed against making those documents public in a January 2024 court filing, saying it could interfere with Maxwell’s ongoing appeal of her conviction and subject victims and witnesses to “embarrassment and potential harassment.”

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Releasing the Epstein gra...