General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow The NRA Stifled Gun Violence Research
Spencer: For Hire @OakFoSho
#NRA kills research into the effects of gun laws by lobbying to cut funding for such studies http://bit.ly/UWz67e #p2 #tcot #Newtown
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/12/20/1366561/how-the-nra-stifled-gun-violence-research/?mobile=nc
The tragic massacre at an elementary school in Newtown, CT on Friday reignited the debate over the solution to Americas gun problem. President Obama announced that Vice President Joe Biden would lead a task force to examine the available evidence and make recommendations for new policies to prevent the next shooting. But thanks to a concerted, 20-year effort by the National Rifle Association, the available evidence is severely lacking.
While pushing a radical agenda to arm as many people in as many places as possible, the NRA has also maintained a side campaign to quash research into the effects of gun laws. The group successfully lobbied to cut off almost all funding for such studies. The Center for Disease Control, once the main patron of gun violence research, was stripped of funds for firearms research. The agency has not conducted any studies on the matter since 1996. As a result, the debate that arises after each shooting has very little evidence to consider.
Scientists and researchers who want to study why American gun homicides are so much higher than all other developed nations are now dependent on just a few private foundations still willing to brave the wrath of the gun lobby. The NRA has continued its intimidation campaign even as gun violence research becomes virtually nonexistent:
The amount of money available today for studying the impact of firearms is a fraction of what it was in the mid-1990s, and the number of scientists toiling in the field has dwindled to just a handful as a result, researchers say.
(Slightly more at the link.)
Cary
(11,746 posts)that just about everything related to an old book by John Lott entitled "More Guns, Less Crime."
There was a very small body of scholarly literature opposing this theory, proving that money can even buy scholarly opinion. Sad.
rustydog
(9,186 posts)Koch brothers bought "scientists" to debunk global warning...amonth back, thier climate denier changed his tune and said so...I wonder if he has to returnt he bribe?
Cary
(11,746 posts)99.9% of the climate scientists agree otherwise.
Here it seems we have a pro-gun theory and pretty much nothing to counter it.
Bucky
(55,334 posts)They never change
