Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

speak easy

(12,597 posts)
Sat Jul 26, 2025, 02:09 PM Jul 2025

Bill Clinton is blamed for repealing Glass-Steagall.

The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act passed the House 362–57 and the Senate 90–8. A Presidential Veto under those circumstances would have been pointless, performative, and laughable, although those who subscribe to the Pickett's Charge theory of politics might disagree.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill Clinton is blamed for repealing Glass-Steagall. (Original Post) speak easy Jul 2025 OP
He seems to have been pretty happy to sign it, just as many Democrats were to vote for it muriel_volestrangler Jul 2025 #1
But vetoing it would have absolved him of the responsibility for its consequences Justice Brandeis Jul 2025 #2
I still think that Bill Clinton was a great POTUS LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2025 #3
Next, let's look at his welfare reform, gab13by13 Jul 2025 #4
He doesn't run away from it still-prayin4rain Jul 2025 #5
But he could not have stopped it. speak easy Jul 2025 #6
Yeah, I see your point. still-prayin4rain Jul 2025 #8
Bill smoked Marijuana but he didn't inhale :) speak easy Jul 2025 #9
Blame may not be the right verb. Kid Berwyn Jul 2025 #7

muriel_volestrangler

(106,160 posts)
1. He seems to have been pretty happy to sign it, just as many Democrats were to vote for it
Sat Jul 26, 2025, 02:21 PM
Jul 2025
MARIA BARTIROMO

Mr. President, in 1999 you signed a bill essentially rolling back Glass-Steagall and deregulating banking. In light of what has gone on, do you regret that decision?

FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON

No, because it wasn't a complete deregulation at all. We still have heavy regulations and insurance on bank deposits, requirements on banks for capital and for disclosure. I thought at the time that it might lead to more stable investments and a reduced pressure on Wall Street to produce quarterly profits that were always bigger than the previous quarter. But I have really thought about this a lot. I don't see that signing that bill had anything to do with the current crisis. Indeed, one of the things that has helped stabilize the current situation as much as it has is the purchase of Merrill Lynch (MER) by Bank of America (BAC), which was much smoother than it would have been if I hadn't signed that bill.

Phil Gramm, who was then the head of the Senate Banking Committee and until recently a close economic adviser of Senator McCain, was a fierce proponent of banking deregulation. Did he sell you a bill of goods?

Not on this bill I don't think he did. You know, Phil Gramm and I disagreed on a lot of things, but he can't possibly be wrong about everything. On the Glass-Steagall thing, like I said, if you could demonstrate to me that it was a mistake, I'd be glad to look at the evidence. But I can't blame [the Republicans]. This wasn't something they forced me into. I really believed that given the level of oversight of banks and their ability to have more patient capital, if you made it possible for [commercial banks] to go into the investment banking business as Continental European investment banks could always do, that it might give us a more stable source of long-term investment.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150331041223/http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2008-09-23/bill-clinton-on-the-banking-crisis-mccain-and-hillary
 

Justice Brandeis

(405 posts)
2. But vetoing it would have absolved him of the responsibility for its consequences
Sat Jul 26, 2025, 02:42 PM
Jul 2025

Much like Harry Truman vetoing the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947. It was overridden and became law, but he could wash his hands of it.

still-prayin4rain

(525 posts)
5. He doesn't run away from it
Sat Jul 26, 2025, 03:11 PM
Jul 2025
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/250838-bill-clinton-defends-repeal-of-glass-steagall/

"Clinton told Inc. in an interview. “Look at all the grief I got for signing the bill that ended Glass-Steagall. There’s not a single, solitary example that it had anything to do with the financial crash.”"

speak easy

(12,597 posts)
6. But he could not have stopped it.
Sat Jul 26, 2025, 03:24 PM
Jul 2025

It would not have mattered who was president but Bill is not the kind of guy who readily admits to mistakes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill Clinton is blamed fo...