Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,895 posts)
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 10:30 AM Jul 2025

How Trump Is Attacking the Legal System, via the Legal System

The president has an outside-inside strategy to fight the judiciary.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/30/us/politics/trump-legal-system.html

https://archive.ph/banGk


President Trump and his allies are confronting the nation’s justice system with increasing intensity. A Trump ally who has been accused of suggesting department officials consider ignoring court orders has been confirmed to one of the nation’s highest courts. The administration has clashed with Federal District Court judges over their power to appoint prosecutors. It has opened formal complaints against judges it has disagreed with, and it has even sued an entire federal bench in Maryland.

Trump frequently complains about the judges who rule against him, and in some instances, his administration has defied court orders outright. The whirl of activity is hard to keep track of. The administration’s critics warn that it matters, because it could erode the ability of the judiciary to check a president’s power. Crucially, though, one of the administration’s main weapons against the system is the system itself. Trump’s clashes with the courts must run through the courts — a fact that brings comfort to some legal experts, even as they warily watch Trump’s efforts to reshape the system.

“He’s ultimately asking judges to side with him. That is, to me, so much less scary than so many other things that he’s doing that I have attacked fiercely,” said Akhil Reed Amar, a professor at Yale Law School. “Because at the end of the day,” he added, referring to the chief justice of the United States, “these issues are going to be decided, according to this strategy, by John Roberts and not Donald Trump.”

Putting the outside critic inside

In 1937, with President Franklin Delano Roosevelt reeling from Supreme Court decisions that stopped parts of his New Deal from taking effect, he nominated a vocal critic of the court to join it: Senator Hugo Black of Alabama, who had backed Roosevelt’s ill-fated plan to pack the court. He had decided to put an outside critic on the inside. That, Amar told me, bears some similarity to Trump’s appointment of his former defense lawyer Emil Bove to a powerful federal appeals court.

snip
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Trump Is Attacking th...