Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Maddow Blog-As GOP's radical Texas map is unveiled, Vance picks odd time to whine about gerrymandering
Why complain about gerrymandering on the same afternoon that JD Vance's own party advanced a closely watched gerrymandering scheme at his boss’ behest?
As GOP's radical Texas map is unveiled, Vance picks odd time to whine about gerrymandering.
— [The Great War & Modern Memory] (@ps9714.bsky.social) 2025-07-31T14:36:23.755Z
Why complain about gerrymandering on the same afternoon that JD Vance's own party advanced a closely watched gerrymandering scheme at his boss’ behest?
By @stevebenen.com
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/gops-radical-texas-map-unveiled-vance-picks-odd-time-whine-gerrymander-rcna222170
Partisan legislators are doing precisely what they were instructed to do. NBC News reported:
....A couple of hours before Texas Republicans unveiled their draft map, JD Vance took the opportunity to weigh in on the debate — by, oddly enough, complaining about gerrymandering.
“The gerrymander in California is outrageous,” the vice president wrote via social media. “Of their 52 congressional districts, 9 of them are Republican. That means 17 percent of their delegation is Republican when Republicans regularly win 40 percent of the vote in that state. How can this possibly be allowed?”
So, a few things.
First, California’s map really isn’t that bad, as gerrymanders go, but in light of the Texas Republicans’ scheme, it might soon become a lot more slanted.
Second, if Vance is looking for some truly outrageous gerrymandering, I’d direct his attention to the Republican-drawn maps in states such as North Carolina, Wisconsin and Vance’s adopted home state of Ohio.
Third, while it’s certainly true that Democrats in blue states have drawn some gerrymandered maps — there are no angels here — it was congressional Democrats who proposed doing away with partisan gerrymandering altogether in a democracy-reform package unveiled in 2021. Republicans rejected it — even though it would’ve created a level playing field for both parties. (If readers were curious, Vance didn’t vote on the bill: It was unveiled four years ago, and the vice president’s career in elected office only began two-and-a-half years ago.)
“How can this possibly be allowed?” the vice president asked, referring to partisan district lines. The answer is, “Because your party has blocked reform efforts.”
Texas Republicans released a proposed new congressional map Wednesday that would give the GOP a path to pick up five seats in next year’s midterm elections. The proposal, which follows President Donald Trump’s public pressing for a new map in the state, would shift district lines in ways that would target current Democratic members of Congress in districts in and around Austin, Dallas and Houston, as well as two already endangered Democrats representing South Texas districts that Trump carried last year.
....A couple of hours before Texas Republicans unveiled their draft map, JD Vance took the opportunity to weigh in on the debate — by, oddly enough, complaining about gerrymandering.
“The gerrymander in California is outrageous,” the vice president wrote via social media. “Of their 52 congressional districts, 9 of them are Republican. That means 17 percent of their delegation is Republican when Republicans regularly win 40 percent of the vote in that state. How can this possibly be allowed?”
So, a few things.
First, California’s map really isn’t that bad, as gerrymanders go, but in light of the Texas Republicans’ scheme, it might soon become a lot more slanted.
Second, if Vance is looking for some truly outrageous gerrymandering, I’d direct his attention to the Republican-drawn maps in states such as North Carolina, Wisconsin and Vance’s adopted home state of Ohio.
Third, while it’s certainly true that Democrats in blue states have drawn some gerrymandered maps — there are no angels here — it was congressional Democrats who proposed doing away with partisan gerrymandering altogether in a democracy-reform package unveiled in 2021. Republicans rejected it — even though it would’ve created a level playing field for both parties. (If readers were curious, Vance didn’t vote on the bill: It was unveiled four years ago, and the vice president’s career in elected office only began two-and-a-half years ago.)
“How can this possibly be allowed?” the vice president asked, referring to partisan district lines. The answer is, “Because your party has blocked reform efforts.”
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
