General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInconvenient parts of the Constitution removed from Library of Congress website
I just saw a rumor online that appears to be true. Apparently someone has removed Section 9 and 10 of Article 1 from the official text of the US Constitution hosted by our government on congress.gov.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/
Section 9, of course contains the Emoluments Clause, which the Republican Congress and Supreme Court has chosen to completely ignore as it pertains to Trump.
Section 10 states that only Congress can impose tariffs.
So it looks like they're not even going to bother with amendments anymore. They can just erase the parts of the Constitution they don't like and pretend they never existed.
Edit: changed title to clarify this is the Library of Congress website.
MrWowWow
(1,461 posts)was it legally altered?
Ocelot II
(129,722 posts)The Senate still has them, https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm#a1 and so does the National Archives, https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript and the govinfo site, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CONAN-2022/pdf/GPO-CONAN-2022.pdf
Considering how generally sloppy and incompetent the Trump regime is at all levels, it could be that a minion, probably some teenaged nepobaby who got a summer job working on the Congress web site, just cut off the last two sections of Article I because they didn't fit on the page and the kid didn't want to bother to reformat it.
nilram
(3,507 posts)Archive.org on July 27, 2025, thirteen days ago. It's completely there.
https://web.archive.org/web/20250725172744/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/
There's no change in formatting between the archive.org version and the one on the website currently.
And, if you know how, you can inspect the data coming back from the website with your browser. In the HTTP response for https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/, the response field for Last-Modified is "Tue, 05 Aug 2025 21:07:33 GMT". No other part of the page has been modified since before that. The .css files haven't been changed since before April and it's implausible beyond belief that reformatting would not have changed them. IMO, anyway.
Eliot Rosewater
(34,282 posts)B.See
(8,017 posts)Ocelot II
(129,722 posts)not that of the Congress itself, or at least it's created or managed by the Library. I was also able to find a reference to Section 9 by doing a term search for "bill of attainder" in the annotation section, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-1/ALDE_00000242/['Bill',%20'of',%20'Attainder'] So I think it's probably a fuckup, not a deliberate attempt to erase parts of the Constitution. I might try to find an email address to inquire about it.
Added: I did find a way to contact them, so I sent off an email inquiring about what happened to sections 9 and 10. I should get a response in about 5 business days.
I edited the title to reflect this
Foolacious
(540 posts)nilram
(3,507 posts)Looking at the underlying website data (cf, my prior response), I'm more inclined to think it's deliberate.
riversedge
(80,026 posts)What next?
B.See
(8,017 posts)That is precisely what the Supreme Court did last week. But the news is too staggering to hide for long: The Republican-appointed justices have decided it is time to fully destroy the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
You got it.
BoRaGard
(7,591 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)Article II, section 1, Clause 7
But yeah, it's odd about the sections missing from Article I
intheflow
(30,074 posts)Gaslighting in real time. Fuckers.
mackdaddy
(1,962 posts)How to remove an incompetent President sounds like something to disappear down the Memory Hole.
And that 22 amendment to limit the president to two terms. Never happened....
Have you never heard of the 'Mandela Effect'?
