Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Diraven

(1,856 posts)
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:11 PM Aug 2025

Inconvenient parts of the Constitution removed from Library of Congress website

I just saw a rumor online that appears to be true. Apparently someone has removed Section 9 and 10 of Article 1 from the official text of the US Constitution hosted by our government on congress.gov.

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/

Section 9, of course contains the Emoluments Clause, which the Republican Congress and Supreme Court has chosen to completely ignore as it pertains to Trump.

Section 10 states that only Congress can impose tariffs.

So it looks like they're not even going to bother with amendments anymore. They can just erase the parts of the Constitution they don't like and pretend they never existed.

Edit: changed title to clarify this is the Library of Congress website.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Inconvenient parts of the Constitution removed from Library of Congress website (Original Post) Diraven Aug 2025 OP
Was this govt. site hacked or MrWowWow Aug 2025 #1
That's very strange. Those sections haven't been removed from other .gov sites, though. Ocelot II Aug 2025 #2
It was there 2 weeks ago. nilram Aug 2025 #9
America is gone Eliot Rosewater Aug 2025 #3
In many respects, yes. B.See Aug 2025 #14
WTF SunSeeker Aug 2025 #4
On further examination, it appears that this is part of the Library of Congress' website, Ocelot II Aug 2025 #5
Thanks! Diraven Aug 2025 #6
They also lost the latter part of section 8. N/T Foolacious Aug 2025 #8
Thanks for sending off a query. nilram Aug 2025 #10
Thanks riversedge Aug 2025 #17
What? Lulu KC Aug 2025 #7
The Voting Rights Act: B.See Aug 2025 #15
Yup Lulu KC Aug 2025 #16
Sneaky anti-American republicons are a plague upon the nation BoRaGard Aug 2025 #11
The Emoluments clause that pertains to the President is still on the website SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2025 #12
"Four legs good, two legs better." intheflow Aug 2025 #13
Anybody check if section 4 of the 25th Amendment is still there? mackdaddy Aug 2025 #18

Ocelot II

(129,722 posts)
2. That's very strange. Those sections haven't been removed from other .gov sites, though.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:37 PM
Aug 2025

The Senate still has them, https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm#a1 and so does the National Archives, https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript and the govinfo site, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CONAN-2022/pdf/GPO-CONAN-2022.pdf

Considering how generally sloppy and incompetent the Trump regime is at all levels, it could be that a minion, probably some teenaged nepobaby who got a summer job working on the Congress web site, just cut off the last two sections of Article I because they didn't fit on the page and the kid didn't want to bother to reformat it.

nilram

(3,507 posts)
9. It was there 2 weeks ago.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 03:17 AM
Aug 2025

Archive.org on July 27, 2025, thirteen days ago. It's completely there.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250725172744/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/

There's no change in formatting between the archive.org version and the one on the website currently.

And, if you know how, you can inspect the data coming back from the website with your browser. In the HTTP response for https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/, the response field for Last-Modified is "Tue, 05 Aug 2025 21:07:33 GMT". No other part of the page has been modified since before that. The .css files haven't been changed since before April and it's implausible beyond belief that reformatting would not have changed them. IMO, anyway.

Ocelot II

(129,722 posts)
5. On further examination, it appears that this is part of the Library of Congress' website,
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:54 PM
Aug 2025

not that of the Congress itself, or at least it's created or managed by the Library. I was also able to find a reference to Section 9 by doing a term search for "bill of attainder" in the annotation section, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-1/ALDE_00000242/['Bill',%20'of',%20'Attainder'] So I think it's probably a fuckup, not a deliberate attempt to erase parts of the Constitution. I might try to find an email address to inquire about it.

Added: I did find a way to contact them, so I sent off an email inquiring about what happened to sections 9 and 10. I should get a response in about 5 business days.

nilram

(3,507 posts)
10. Thanks for sending off a query.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 03:23 AM
Aug 2025

Looking at the underlying website data (cf, my prior response), I'm more inclined to think it's deliberate.

B.See

(8,017 posts)
15. The Voting Rights Act:
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 09:16 AM
Aug 2025
The Supreme Court Prepares to End Voting Rights As We Know It - Mother Jones And they don’t want you to notice.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that if you want to hide what you are doing in Washington, announce it on a Friday evening in the heat of August. Better yet, in place of clarity, reference some pages in another document, so that people have to track that down and read it in order to grasp what you are telling them.

That is precisely what the Supreme Court did last week. But the news is too staggering to hide for long: The Republican-appointed justices have decided it is time to fully destroy the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
12. The Emoluments clause that pertains to the President is still on the website
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 05:24 AM
Aug 2025

Article II, section 1, Clause 7

But yeah, it's odd about the sections missing from Article I

mackdaddy

(1,962 posts)
18. Anybody check if section 4 of the 25th Amendment is still there?
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 11:31 AM
Aug 2025

How to remove an incompetent President sounds like something to disappear down the Memory Hole.

And that 22 amendment to limit the president to two terms. Never happened....

Have you never heard of the 'Mandela Effect'?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Inconvenient parts of the...