Remember you have power:

[applegrove]

— (@darren32359.bsky.social) 2025-08-11T18:57:21.981Z

[Progressive dog]

1. And then they chose Napoleon

to rule. Neither had anything to do with unions.

[applegrove]

2. Today. These days. In the last 50 years French people

go on national strikes all the time. That is what the out-take is referring to.

[Progressive dog]

3. It refers to history

that had nothing to do with unions.

[applegrove]

4. It says "now". It is referring to the present day which

is filled with general strikes.

[Progressive dog]

5. It is crediting the unions

with making France the way it is now. It is not true that the unions had anything to do with chopping the French heads off, The rich at that time were royalty. Or are you seriously arguing that unions in France are cutting rich peoples' heads off in this time.
BTW Anything that happened in the past and was recorded is history.

[applegrove]

6. Good grief. I hope you are getting paid to do this.

[Progressive dog]

7. I hate false history.

Truth is always truth and no word salad changes that.

[applegrove]

8. You are wrong. The OP is perfectly clear. There was a revolution.

Many wealthy were killed. Now, and it says now in the OP, people stay off from work when they think the government has overstepped their power. Those are mass demonstration. Unions. Sorry it triggers you but the truth of the op is obvious.

[Progressive dog]

9. The OP certainly is clear

when it explains why the rich in France were killed and that is completely false,

[applegrove]

10. So Versaille is not too much?

[Progressive dog]

11. No it isn't

Maybe the Roman Colliseum would be too much but neither have anything to do with unions and never will.