Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SpankMe

(3,762 posts)
Fri Aug 15, 2025, 08:00 PM Aug 2025

Cali Dem leaders: Satellite deorbiting proposal - URGENT

DU thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143513382

Article: https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/13/climate/nasa-satellites-trump-budget-cuts-weather

I just sent a letter to California governor Newsom with a suggestion. California has always been at the forefront of environmental protection. Trump's politburo has decided to de-orbit - and allow to burn up - the NASA climate study satellites that are still actively in-mission. Their stated reason is "budget cuts". The real reason is to obstruct climate science by eliminating data collection.

In reference to one satellite - OCO-2, Orbiting Carbon Observatory - the satellite is bought and paid for and costs only $15M/year to maintain and collect data from. It's good through 2040. It collects valuable data about carbon in Earth's atmosphere. It is operated from a small control room at JPL.

I propose that the state of California - the University of California system, to be exact - take over the satellite's mission. UC's budget is $10B/yr. Certainly they can find a paltry $15M/yr to operate OCO-2 and keep that sweet data coming it. It's operated out of JPL in Pasadena.

They could even partner with other universities with climate programs in other states and split the costs. The cost per stakeholder would be trivial. The satellite's already paid for. Only mission ops would be required.

For a very small amount - probably less than $1M up front - they could move the control room outside of JPL an into a UC facility. For a few dollars more, they could even move the uplink from NASA equipment to a UC-owned antenna somewhere.

If any highly placed California Democrats monitor DU, please read this and take it under advisement. Thanks.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cali Dem leaders: Satellite deorbiting proposal - URGENT (Original Post) SpankMe Aug 2025 OP
JPL is managed by Caltech, a private university. eppur_se_muova Aug 2025 #1
good proposal, I like it... 100% WarGamer Aug 2025 #2

eppur_se_muova

(42,523 posts)
1. JPL is managed by Caltech, a private university.
Fri Aug 15, 2025, 10:10 PM
Aug 2025

I doubt they would object if the UC system wanted to share some of the costs, or share the already installed facility; no need to relocate it. Cooperation in academia should be much easier than with a pathologically partisan maladministration.

Thanks for posting this info; I had heard about the story but not the details.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cali Dem leaders: Satelli...