Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(131,248 posts)
Sun Aug 17, 2025, 11:03 AM Aug 2025

Those particular papers didn't contain state secrets, but the WH mouthpieces miss the point,

which is that if you're making copies for a significant WH event you don't ever make them on a public photocopier at all, because most modern printers store the images on an internal hard drive, which is a significant security risk. And don't make matters even worse by leaving the originals in the copier. Those papers did include the phone numbers of several WH aides, which shouldn't have been public. The documents themselves were pretty innocuous but that's beside the point. Whatever they were should not have been copied on a device available to the public.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Those particular papers d...