General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsResponse to red dog 1 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
WhiskeyGrinder
(27,227 posts)hatrack
(65,145 posts)Alerting.
Response to hatrack (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JoseBalow
(9,741 posts)Xavier Breath
(6,674 posts)Well, "fear" is a bit strong.
JoseBalow
(9,741 posts)I was commenting about the irony of violating the rule about interfering with forum moderation, but here we are.
BannonsLiver
(20,857 posts)Ms. Toad
(38,824 posts)The first amendment first not give you the right to post signs on public (or someone else's) property. Just because you can say it doesn't mean you can take over someone else's property to say it.
That said, It would be up to the property owner, or real police, on public property, to remove it.
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)It looks like it might be on private property. (My eyes are bad right now)
Possibly a city park?
Is this even in DC? Sign says Mount Pleasant.
Ms. Toad
(38,824 posts)So maybe they could remove it from property owned by the federal government. But they have no more authority to remove it from private property (without the consent of the owner) than anyone else has to put it there in the first place (without the consent of the owner).
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)LOL...Street view shows the sign. That's hilarious!

Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.