Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SpankMe

(3,762 posts)
Mon Aug 18, 2025, 05:43 PM Aug 2025

I'm not sure defacing wild animals is a good idea

I know the intent is to save them, but we don't know how it will affect them in nature.

I recall several decades ago when environmentalists tried to apply some kind of paint or permanent dye to live seals in the wild to discourage hunters from killing them for their pelts. They couldn't paint enough of them to make much of a difference, and animal experts were concerned about how the chemicals in the dye would affect the animals' health and speculated that it could negatively impact natural breeding. (Juvenile Harp seals had a hard time getting dates with their white fur painted fluorescent orange.)

The impact on breeding was speculative, and there weren't enough defaced seals to provide meaningful statistics on altered breeding and reproduction. But wildlife experts generally panned the practice and saw it more as wildlife harassment.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm not sure defacing wil...