General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThey really don't want us to have Medicare for all
OMG no Precedent - So we can't do it
— Dcmfox (@dcmfox.bsky.social) 2025-08-20T16:22:25.672Z
gab13by13
(32,976 posts)Medicare isn't listed on the stock exchange, just needs to break even.
edhopper
(37,632 posts)Medicare at all.
JustAnotherGen
(38,171 posts)Or Social Security
In just 7 months the magapub voters have destroyed so much. I hate those people.
erronis
(24,791 posts)BigmanPigman
(55,728 posts)rsdsharp
(12,120 posts)MichMan
(17,547 posts)Matthew28
(1,916 posts)They look down their noses and want to go back to the good old days where they could rule over us, enslave people and work people until they died.
Fuck no they don't want us to have healthcare.
mwmisses4289
(4,999 posts)for all exists in other countries, so there are precedents for america to use as a foundation to build on.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)Medicaid expanision, etc.
Maybe we can buck trend, but I doubt it. We'll be sitting here 20 years from now debating the same issue. Hopefully, Congress will reinstall the Covid expanded ACA subsidies, but that's questionable too.
a kennedy
(36,672 posts)🤬 🤬 🤬 🤬 🤬
WestMichRad
(3,484 posts)Social Security
ANY government medical care assistance
ANY social services
Military equipment manufacturing
Food safety laws and inspections
before these services were first introduced.
No precedent for Medicare for All? Meaningless. Our government, lest some forget, is for serving the people. Someday, when we finally have enough elected officials who care about serving the people, we will get Medicare for all. Hopefully, it will be soon. There is no law granting health insurance companies the right to operate in perpetuity.
homegirl
(2,021 posts)Universal Health care and mandatory insurance on all guns. Minimum $10 million coverage on each weapon.
Insurance companies have a guaranteed replacement market and the citizenry an immediate reduction in the proliferation of weapons in the USA.
erronis
(24,791 posts)Wait - I don't think that would work well for us.
But I do like your idea without my stupid NRA appendage.
Dan
(5,325 posts)(Even tho imperfect) had the best interests of the people as their guiding light. Now, I believe that those leading (oligarchs) our nation tend to believe that people are not necessary, were expendable and serve little purpose aside from consumption. I believe that the powers-that-be really believe that AI will replace most of our (skilled and educated) population with the exception of that requiring non-repetitive physical labor. They have figured out that they really no-longer need a consumer society when they have all the money. So, by replacing the non-essential people with AI, the remaining people will always be fighting to survive. Mostly, fighting ourselves. We are obsolete and a lot of us are supporting this future, knowingly or unknowingly.