Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

justaprogressive

(7,170 posts)
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 11:09 AM Aug 2025

EPA Is '100 Percent' Union-Busting, Workers Say by James Baratta



All but one of the collective-bargaining agreements covering employees at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are null and void. On August 8, the agency unilaterally terminated its agreements with five unions, including the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), to comply with an executive order President Trump handed down earlier this year.

“It was disappointing, but not unforeseen,” Justin Chen, former president of AFGE Local 1003, a union representing Texas-based EPA employees, told the Prospect in an interview.

On August 1, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted a preliminary injunction that had halted the order, which strips workers at 21 federal agencies of their right to collective bargaining in the name of “national security.” The litigation is pending. EPA leadership has since seized the opportunity to end collective bargaining for its workers, but the agency went a step further by requiring prior approval for union-protected activities—on non-duty time. (The EPA already prohibits bargaining-unit employees from participating in such activities during work hours.)

According to an internal advisory obtained by the Prospect, the agency has resorted to citing U.S. Criminal Code as justification for prior authorization, specifically referencing “the representational conflicts of interest statute.” The statute is designed to prevent conflicts of interest emerging from outside employment, whether paid or unpaid, but the EPA appears to be using it to restrict federal workers from participating in union-protected activities. In the agency’s plane of reality, building support for improved working conditions without permission could be a criminal offense. Describing the agency’s conduct, Chen said “it’s 100 percent union-busting.”

Chen is president of AFGE Council 238, a federation of more than a dozen local unions representing some 8,000 EPA employees across the country. AFGE swiftly sued to block the implementation of Trump’s executive order, leading a coalition of unions representing federal workers at the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Health and Human Services. In a statement, AFGE noted that the Office of Personnel Management’s own guidance directs agencies to refrain from terminating collective-bargaining agreements “until the conclusion of litigation.”


https://prospect.org/labor/2025-08-25-epa-100-percent-union-busting-workers-say/]

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA Is '100 Percent' Union-Busting, Workers Say by James Baratta (Original Post) justaprogressive Aug 2025 OP
kick Celerity Aug 2025 #1
Evil mother... Bettie Aug 2025 #2

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EPA Is '100 Percent' Unio...