General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis Time
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you cant take part; you cant even passively take part, and youve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and youve got to make it stop. And youve got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless youre free, the machine will be prevented from working at all! Mario Savio
Some older community members will recall the 1964 speech Bodies Upon the Gears at Sproul Hall at Berkeley's Free Speech Movement. Some of the younger community members here may be familiar with it, as well. Still others may not be familiar with it, and so I thought it might be high time to focus on the above part of Savio's powerful speech.
Now, I am not 100% pleased with what I consider a lack of meaningful action on the part of some of our elected representatives in the House and Senate. I am not a cheerleader. But at the same time, I am happy with the leadership of a number of them, even if they are not the official party leadership, according to the DNC. Rather, these are the leaders that a significant segment of the grass roots.
It is those groups and individuals that, by no coincidence, tend to be the Democratic Party's activists. They include the social-political activists that I have worked with for over half a century. They volunteer at local party headquarters, make phone calls, and go door-to-door. They are active in local, state, and presidential elections. Thus, they tend to have a greater grasp of the pulse of those who actually vote or not than those inhabiting offices in state capitals and DC.
When we consider the first of the Amendments to the Constitution's Bill of Rights, we find their job description:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I again note that our party has elected representatives in DC who are fighting the Good Fight. More, we have elected representatives at state levels who are actively engaged in the struggle. We should be actively supporting them something beyond saying, That's good when watching the news or on the internet. These times require activity, rather than passiveness, or worse, just complaining.
At this point in time, it is the responsibility of the grass roots to be active on a much higher level than at any time in the last fifty years. If, for example, our passive friends would be contacting their elected officials, attending rallies, and adding their strength to the fight, it would be a heck of a first step. If you tend to complain, you will find it more refreshing when on the phone with the elected representative's staff.
If you are thinking, Oh, sure that sounds good, but I'm represented by a maga shit head!, I strongly recommend re-reading Amendment 1. The Founding Fathers were aware of the potential for this very dynamic, and provided you will the tools you need to place that maga on the hot seat.
Finally, for those in the community who are activists, keep it up. And, for those with ears, we are at the point where it is essential that we step it up to a higher level. I favor the tactics of Gandhi and King. I am curious what others are thinking, doing, and willing to do.
As always,
H2O Man
senseandsensibility
(25,534 posts)We are in the majority. A national strike would be effective. The protests have been good, I applaud all who plan and attend them, and think it is counter-productive to sit back and criticize. I have a friend on social media who runs you tube videos about how the press is ignoring the protests. There are many of think this is happening, and I tend to agree that they are not getting the attention they deserve. A national strike would make them cover it, which is kind of the point.
H2O Man
(79,257 posts)Thank you. Valid points, all.
Regarding the media ...... long ago, in the pre-internet era, I found ways to get media attention. That included being creative, and aware that while reporters tended to be liberal, their bosses were usually conservative. I found the key was to get one local media source to report on the given issue, as others would soon follow.
Though some of the newspapers I once used have gone under, there are lots of alternative sources. Your friend is a good example of someone who is creative. In my opinion, it will be grass roots individuals and small groups going for a common goal in a largely decentralized manner that can institute meaningful change.
Saoirse9
(3,967 posts)I don't know what else to do. He's a maga loon. Bilirakis.
H2O Man
(79,257 posts)Did you get a response? If not, call his office.
How about your Senators? I am sorry that you live in that state.
Another option is calling the offices of those who are taking positive stances & actions, and thanking them. It is important that they know they have wide-spread support.
Saoirse9
(3,967 posts)Nothing like a real answer to my question. He asked if he was doing a good job and I responded that if he's not advocating for the release of the full unredacted Epstein files he's not doing a good job.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.