Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Third grand jury refuses to indict DC woman accused of assaulting agent during ICE arrest
Normally, a prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich. Here Piro tried three times to indict a protester and got three no-bills from the grand jury
Link to tweet
Appointing Jeanine Pirro leads to Jeanine Pirro-level results. www.wusa9.com/article/news...
— James Downie (@jamescdownie.bsky.social) 2025-08-25T23:04:54.774Z
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/for-third-time-grand-jury-refuses-to-indict-dc-woman-accused-of-assaulting-agent-during-ice-arrest-jeanine-pirro-sidney-reid-sandwich-guy/65-785e2e30-46cf-4e90-b81a-9e9c219c6750
WASHINGTON — A grand jury declined for a third time to indict a D.C. woman accused of assaulting an FBI agent during an inmate swap with ICE – a rare loss for federal prosecutors that could foreshadow further trouble if the case goes to trial.
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said in a filing Monday it would move ahead with charging Sidney Lori Reid with a misdemeanor for the alleged assault outside the D.C. Jail in July. A magistrate judge had given prosecutors until Monday afternoon to secure an indictment against Reid or see the felony version of the assault charge dismissed.
Grand juries decline to indict, known as a “no true bill,” in only a small fraction of federal cases. To secure an indictment prosecutors need only show probable cause a crime was committed. That’s much lower than the standard in criminal trials. A grand jury declining to indict three times on the same case is a warning the evidence may not stand up at trial, according to attorney Christopher Macchiaroli, a partner at Silverman Thompson Slutkin White who previously served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the federal prosecutor’s office in D.C.
“Seeking an indictment for a third time is extremely rare and usually only reserved for the most serious of crimes,” Macchiaroli said. “If a governmental entity cannot convince a super majority of grand jurors that there is a fair probability that a crime was committed, it is virtually impossible to believe that twelve jurors in the same relevant jurisdiction could unanimously at a future date find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard of proof under the law.”
Reid was arrested in July for allegedly resisting attempts to restrain her after she refused to back away from ICE officers who were conducting arrests outside the D.C. Jail. In the process, they said, an FBI agent received scrapes to the back of her hand.
Prosecutors sought to indict Reid with an enhanced felony version of an assault charge that requires inflicting bodily injury on a federal officer and carries up to eight years in prison. The charge is the same offense filed earlier this month against a former DOJ employee accused of throwing a sandwich at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent.
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said in a filing Monday it would move ahead with charging Sidney Lori Reid with a misdemeanor for the alleged assault outside the D.C. Jail in July. A magistrate judge had given prosecutors until Monday afternoon to secure an indictment against Reid or see the felony version of the assault charge dismissed.
Grand juries decline to indict, known as a “no true bill,” in only a small fraction of federal cases. To secure an indictment prosecutors need only show probable cause a crime was committed. That’s much lower than the standard in criminal trials. A grand jury declining to indict three times on the same case is a warning the evidence may not stand up at trial, according to attorney Christopher Macchiaroli, a partner at Silverman Thompson Slutkin White who previously served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the federal prosecutor’s office in D.C.
“Seeking an indictment for a third time is extremely rare and usually only reserved for the most serious of crimes,” Macchiaroli said. “If a governmental entity cannot convince a super majority of grand jurors that there is a fair probability that a crime was committed, it is virtually impossible to believe that twelve jurors in the same relevant jurisdiction could unanimously at a future date find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard of proof under the law.”
Reid was arrested in July for allegedly resisting attempts to restrain her after she refused to back away from ICE officers who were conducting arrests outside the D.C. Jail. In the process, they said, an FBI agent received scrapes to the back of her hand.
Prosecutors sought to indict Reid with an enhanced felony version of an assault charge that requires inflicting bodily injury on a federal officer and carries up to eight years in prison. The charge is the same offense filed earlier this month against a former DOJ employee accused of throwing a sandwich at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent.
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
This case should never have been brought. The statements that Piro wants to exclude are all admissible
Link to tweet
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.