General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDC-AL: 88-Year-Old House Democrat Says She's Running Again: 'I Am Not Going To Step Aside'
Eighty-eight-year-old Democrat Eleanor Holmes Norton announced on Thursday that she would be seeking re-election in 2026 as a delegate to Congress from Washington, D.C. ,despite her advanced age.
Asked by Axios whether she would be seeking re-election despite growing concerns about her age, Norton the oldest person in Congress said, Of course.
I say that my seniority is what is very important, and I am not going to step aside, the non-voting member declared.
Eighty-year-old Rep. David Scott (D-GA) and 77-year-old Rep. John Larson (D-CT) also told Axios they were planning to run for re-election, despite concerns over their health.
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/88-year-old-house-democrat-says-shes-running-again-i-am-not-going-to-step-aside/
enough
(13,770 posts)marble falls
(72,531 posts)... slapped by reality almost daily.
EdmondDantes_
(2,063 posts)Yes being a member of Congress is work, but I imagine there's a lot of variance in terms of what the staff does and what the member does. It's certainly not doing physical labor and some people enjoy meetings (those people are objectively wrong of course 😄
.
But don't they want to enjoy a retirement with friends and family? My parents are tired of working and actively planning their upcoming retirement.
marble falls
(72,531 posts)... home how useless I am while I know I've got some good mileage left in spite of serious health set backs. I am planning to do volunteer for a meals on wheels kitchen when this latest health setback is righted. I can hear my wife's eyeballs rolling right now.
We worked hard and can't believe we're crossing the cusp of extremely useful to fairly useless. I can see where this is so tough for progressive legislators, as opposed to crooked RWs who have go to the grave keeping all the balls in the air.
EdmondDantes_
(2,063 posts)My grandfather ran his local meals on wheels after retiring. My stepdad is already driving blood for the Red Cross. I see lots of retirees volunteering at the food donation place I volunteer for. My aunt volunteers as case worker or advocate for kids in the CPS system.
I look at it as getting to relax after working hard for a lot of years and chipping in some where you can. Taking a step back doesn't mean useless, but for many people there is an association of monetary value or work equalling value. It can be a really rough transition.
marble falls
(72,531 posts)ProfessorGAC
(77,271 posts)I can't hit the ball as far in golf.
My hands don't move as fast or as accurately on piano or guitar.
When I sub, my feet bother me & my legs are tired, and all I did was walk slowly around the room.
Every day I have clear indicators that I'm not physically what I used to be.
marble falls
(72,531 posts)... doing a show, it took more than a week to recuperate. How easy it was to skip a step and move blithely on.
Blue Full Moon
(3,650 posts)Skittles
(172,852 posts)it is very disturbing
Arazi
(8,887 posts)Nadler stands in stark relief stepping aside BEFORE HES 80!
Ffs
Bluetus
(3,076 posts)Bill Clinton took office at age 46. His campaign manager, Carville, was 47.
LBJ took office at 55.
JFK took office at 43.
Obama was 47.
The past 15 years, Democrats have become frozen in time. And when they do bring on somebody younger like Jeffries, he is 100% the choice and servant of the moribund DNC that hasn't had any bold leadership for at least 40 years.
It isn't entirely about age. It is also about energy, passion, and relevance. But people like Schumer fail on all three: energy, passion, and relevance. How could we possibly lose the younger voters to the monster in the White House today? By allowing the party to promote the least energetic, passionate and relevant. Simple as that.
Davis Hogg has it right. Mamdani has it right Plattner has it right. AOC has it right. Crockett has it right. And Newsome seems to be finding his way out of the DNC wilderness.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)Their reluctance to read the room is maddening
Scrivener7
(60,067 posts)marble falls
(72,531 posts)Scrivener7
(60,067 posts)LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)This call to get rid of all old people in congress is getting ridiculous. Maybe because she's from a red state?
EdmondDantes_
(2,063 posts)She's the non-voting representative from DC. I think the AL is for at large?
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)She's old. Got it@
Gosh, the pitchforks are out! Just say "old" and everyone piles on, even though she's a non-voting member.
maxsolomon
(39,120 posts)Late 80's is OLD. Most people who are 88 are dead.
Celerity
(54,866 posts)Colleagues and friends say Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbias 87-year-old (now 88) nonvoting delegate and a veteran of fights over home rule, is struggling to do her job.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/11/us/politics/eleanor-norton-age-congress-dc.html
https://archive.ph/jzBz1
June 11, 2025
When Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton, the Democrat and nonvoting delegate for Washington, D.C., attended a recent gala to accept an award honoring her decades-long career in Congress, she appeared to be struggling to read her brief remarks. Standing onstage at Arena Stage in April, Ms. Norton referred to the National Environment for the Arts, lauded the D.C. theater for contributions to freedom of suppression and democracy and half-said, half-spelled the name of a former board chair, Beth Newburger Schwartz, as Ethel N-E-W Burger Schwartz. A pall fell over the audience as Ms. Norton stumbled through her speech, according to an attendee.
The scene, which was reported earlier by Washingtonian magazine, was all the more jarring because it followed a video montage celebrating Ms. Nortons many achievements through her three decades in public office, the attendee said. It served as a vivid reminder of what colleagues and friends said has been a notable decline for Ms. Norton the civil rights leader and law professor turned congresswoman known as D.C.s warrior on the Hill that has quieted her voice, leaving her vastly diminished and struggling to fulfill her congressional duties.
More than half a dozen of them spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid publicly disparaging her, though some for years have privately pressed Ms. Norton to reckon with her diminution and decide against seeking re-election. That message doesnt appear to have sunk in. Im going to run, she told reporters at the Capitol on Tuesday, after being questioned about a recent Washington Post report in which D.C. council members raised questions about her ability to do the job and said it was time for her to retire. I dont know why anybody would even ask me.
The reasons are obvious to those who have watched her closely on Capitol Hill. Ms. Norton, who will turn 88 this week, is the oldest member of the House and has become frail. In hearings, she often sits quiet and alone, sometimes relying on staff aides to remind her where she is. (Ms. Nortons office strongly disputed that aides had ever had to do that.) She rarely attends meetings of the Oversight Committee ahead of votes, as members are encouraged to do, instead joining remotely by phone. She sometimes does not seem to recognize people she has known for years.
snip
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)She's at-large from DC.
Celerity
(54,866 posts)each time they took the House back, she (as the DC delegate at-large) could vote on amendments, procedural issues, and non-binding resolutions. She also has franking privileges, floor privileges and can participate in certain other House functions. Non-voting members may, as I stated above, also introduce legislation and may vote in a House committee of which they are a member.
Republican-led Congress denies D.C. delegate a vote. Again.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/republican-congress-denies-dc-representative-a-vote-again/2017/01/03/a8e32760-d1c8-11e6-945a-76f69a399dd5_story.html
https://archive.ph/Gsem5
On the first day of the 115th Congress, members buzzed Tuesday about the repeal of President Obama's health-care law, tax reform and whether to gut the ethics office. All Eleanor Holmes Norton wanted to discuss was a vote. And a symbolic one at that. For the fourth consecutive session, Norton (D), the nonvoting D.C. representative, formally asked the speaker of the House for the ability to vote on amendments and procedural issues. Again, she was thwarted.
This time, she brought D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) and a veterans advocate with her. Norton pushed for a vote in the Committee of the Whole as a down payment on full voting rights for the more than 680,000 American citizens residing in the District of Columbia, who pay the highest federal income taxes per capita in the United States and have fought and died in every American war, yet have no vote on the floor of the House of Representatives, the peoples house, she said.
When Democrats have controlled the House, Norton, the other nonvoting delegates from American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the Virgin Islands and Puerto Ricos resident commissioner were given the courtesy. In Nortons quarter-century of service, that has happened in congressional sessions starting in 1993, 2007 and 2009. The privilege was revoked each time Republicans took back control of the House.
For Norton, the ability to cast a vote as part of the Committee of the Whole is largely symbolic it would allow her to vote on amendments on the House floor but not on final legislation. And, in the past, if a vote by a delegate would determine the outcome of a particular measure, the House voted again without them.
snip
Scrivener7
(60,067 posts)No matter what, we mustn't consider change. We mustn't suggest we can do better. Because everything is going just fine.
LeftInTX
(34,852 posts)She represents DC. If her constituents feel she is doing a good job, then why not?
Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #18)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
awesomerwb1
(5,151 posts)We have lost a couple or 3 seats recently due to illness/death. That's why.
She's 88, going to be 89 next year. Enough. Get some new blood in. It's unbelievable to me we're even arguing over this.
RandySF
(86,193 posts)Arazi
(8,887 posts)And getting experience.
DiFi needed to go 10 years before she died in office. Adam Schiff has been BADASS in her place and Laura Friedman who took his seat is 58 yrs old. Thats generational change that has nothing to do with race.
Steny Hoyer, Chuck Schumer, Bill Pascrell, and yes even Maxine Waters and Bernie need to step aside and mentor younger Dems.
democratsruletheday
(1,921 posts)couldn't agree more. Primary their old azzes. I"m 60 and would have reservations about running for office. 70's and 80's? GTFO here with that BS. Selfish and greedy at the bare minimum
Nanjeanne
(6,640 posts)more than a wish that Democrats with age and experience would mentor young people, encourage young people, and step aside for young people who have a very large stake in the future of this country.
maxsolomon
(39,120 posts)It's doesn't matter if she's dead; she has no power.
betsuni
(29,292 posts)plotting and scheming to hold back the brave and noble Youth who apparently spinelessly cave without fighting or standing up to meet the moment (come on, the old guard can't move very fast, forgets everything, can only eat soft foods -- how hard can it be?).
Response to RandySF (Original post)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
Scrivener7
(60,067 posts)Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #19)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
Quiet Em
(3,014 posts)have recruited anyone to run for her seat. I don't see the point of writing an article complaining about her age without offering an alternative.
valleyrogue
(2,793 posts)Arazi
(8,887 posts)Shed start being a senator for a 6 year term at almost 80 years old! Iirc, she never polled higher than 2-3 points in popularity over GOP candidates as Governor. Schumer banking on name recognition instead of what the voters want - fighters.
This is nuts!
We need to start getting younger Dems in office
Response to Arazi (Reply #25)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)Thats not ageism, its reality. You seem to be saying younger Dems shouldnt be empowered. Ever. We should always defer to the senior elders
We desperately need our next leaders inside to gain experience but they cant do that if old folks refuse to allow that.
Its madness to persist on this track. Dems dont have a million liberal think tanks or conservative conferences or media outlets to groom future legislators like the GOP does.
Bettie
(19,872 posts)The ability to be in congress?
Would you prefer a minimum age of 70 for new congresspersons? That would show those 30 an 40 year old whippersnappers whats what!
Why should young people not have a voice?
themaguffin
(5,415 posts)Response to themaguffin (Reply #27)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
themaguffin
(5,415 posts)two very different things.
Response to themaguffin (Reply #33)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
themaguffin
(5,415 posts)not concerning - not to mention for most areas of work, people retire at a younger age and it's important to let go and hand it off.
There are plenty of experienced politicians in their 40, 50, 60s. etc.
Come on.
Response to themaguffin (Reply #40)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
themaguffin
(5,415 posts)Of course, but that's not what I was referring to. This is gross, but you do you.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)And out in RL.
Its been a steady hum, a growing undercurrent of discontent ever since it was first suggested, even for safe blue Districts, that always gets swatted down with feigned shock.
How dare anyone suggest such a thing?11!!1?
*** cough David Hogg***
As for specifics on this person, see post #16. Shes DiFi all over again
RandiFan1290
(6,712 posts)Renew Deal
(85,349 posts)Autumn
(49,019 posts)I'm all for a required retirement age.
MineralMan
(151,540 posts)So, unless she's a very effective speaker, what she does really makes no difference, really.
I'm not bothered.
lapucelle
(21,129 posts)Nixie
(18,105 posts)betsuni
(29,292 posts)IcyPeas
(25,781 posts)Deep State Witch
(12,755 posts)But it's time to step aside. I think that Muriel Bowser would be great in that role.
Nixie
(18,105 posts)So transparent. If you dont say the magic words, youre too old.
betsuni
(29,292 posts)and The Will of the People.
Nixie
(18,105 posts)all the money is evil except theirs. No other info is needed.
In the meantime, the billionaires are running the country, so it looks like voters didnt buy their script. Again.
Emile
(43,257 posts)cornball 24
(1,584 posts)spotlight as they are the ones to be the decision makers and problem solvers. In order to accomplish positive goals, they need on the job experience. As long as these old coots keep hanging on, they won't have that opportunity. BTW, I'm 83
Justice Brandeis
(405 posts)I just said that.
betsuni
(29,292 posts)Whereas the real enemy, Republicans, vote 100% together to destroy America. Oh, totally, like, both sides same.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.