Post removed

[stopdiggin]

1. 40s is still way, WAY too high

given performance, character, and litany of action.
And - somewhat belies the popular notion that there is really only a small cadre of hard core MAGA true believers ...
Somehow or another (please don't ask me to explain!) there is a greater pool of approval for this disfunction and chicanery, than many of us can wrap our heads around.

[PCIntern]

2. I'm living in North Korea

[raccoon]

3. I don't believe this. Maybe the poll was taken of only billionaires.

[lastlib]

8. or just inside the White House, perhaps?

This regime sees things through a mirror or something. Bad is good, and good is bad. Black is white, and white is black The rich are poor, and the poor are rich.

[PuraVidaDreamin]

4. With registered pedo's?

[Heidi]

5. Uh huh.

[eShirl]

6. who you gonna listen to, me or your lying eyes

[flying_wahini]

7. That looks like a manufactured lie.

One of thousands coming from the WH.

[W_HAMILTON]

9. And your thoughts on that Doodley?

[malaise]

10. The Daily Mail

Last edited Sat Sep 6, 2025, 11:22 AM - Edit history (1)

My toilet paper has more credibility😀😂😀

[GoCubsGo]

11. Isn't that a Rupert Murdoch rag?

Or, is it owned by some other right-wing sycophant?

[Simeon Salus]

12. The Daily Mail is only slightly more reliable than a coin flip

and that's if there are actually two different sides on the coin.

The Daily Mail is a maggot-filled garbage heap. DM was famously the first source ever deprecated by Wikipedia.

From Wikipedia's perennial sources page:

"The Daily Mail has a 'reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication'... ...Some editors regard the Daily Mail as reliable historically, so old articles may be used in a historical context. (Note that dailymail.co.uk is not trustworthy as a source of past content that was printed in the Daily Mail.)"

The Daily Mail isn't even considered a reliable source about itself!

[bearsfootball516]

13. Lol the Daily Mail is a right wing propaganda machine