Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluestarone

(22,466 posts)
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 11:57 AM Sep 2025

Help me understand the Epstein files, and who has seen them as of today.

Has only the committee seen the full files, or has every member seen them as of today? After seeing these files, i cannot imagine any reason why NOT to let the full public see exactly what is in them? The way i'm thinking is, only the committee has seen them so far. Am i right?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Help me understand the Epstein files, and who has seen them as of today. (Original Post) bluestarone Sep 2025 OP
G.O.P. Speaker Mike Johnson's Sugar Daddy (r) is listed BoRaGard Sep 2025 #1
Way more IMHO and enough that it will come out some way some how. Brainfodder Sep 2025 #2
The 1000 FBI agents that redacted them. essaynnc Sep 2025 #3
The attorneys for the survivors have seen them johnnyfins Sep 2025 #4
For one thing "the Epstein files" is an indistinct/fluid term. That term means RockRaven Sep 2025 #5

BoRaGard

(7,591 posts)
1. G.O.P. Speaker Mike Johnson's Sugar Daddy (r) is listed
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 12:01 PM
Sep 2025

G.O.P. Rep Rep. Massie dropped a bomb:
Billionaire John Paulson, top GOP donor, bankroller of the Speaker, and Trump’s campaign,
is in Epstein’s black book.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220611509

essaynnc

(993 posts)
3. The 1000 FBI agents that redacted them.
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 12:14 PM
Sep 2025

They've all seen them, or at least a part of them. We need someone to spilled beans!

RockRaven

(19,755 posts)
5. For one thing "the Epstein files" is an indistinct/fluid term. That term means
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 12:42 PM
Sep 2025

only whatever the speaker intends when they say it, and what one person means is not the same as almost any other. This is, of course, part of the rhetorical game that the Trump/Bondi/etc and Congresscritters have been playing as they try to bullshit the public.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Help me understand the Ep...