Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTom Canned Ham Face Homan wants to "prosecute" imaginary "financial backers" of protesters in weasel words rant
https://www.rawstory.com/tom-homan-protesters-funding/"So those protesters that we do see, I mean, some of it might be organic, but does strike me, it seems like a lot of them are being bused in," the Fox News host argued. "You see them at the end of these protests, actually getting back on buses."
"Are these protesters, the bulk of them, are they actually being financed from the outside?" he wondered. "And is that something that Homeland's looking at? Is the financing of how all these so-called organic protests are happening?"
"Absolutely," Homan admitted. "We know a lot of these protesters are being paid. Many have admitted to it. So, yes, there's a whole effort right now in identifying those who are funding these operations, those who fund the weapons that are being used."
"So, yeah, and they'll be held accountable too and held to the highest standards of the law," he added. "They will be prosecuted, too."
It is not illegal to fund constitutionally-protected free speech in the U.S.
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tom Canned Ham Face Homan wants to "prosecute" imaginary "financial backers" of protesters in weasel words rant (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Sep 2025
OP
marble falls
(73,647 posts)1. Homan, eh? He's not quite human?
no_hypocrisy
(55,845 posts)2. Nah. SCOTUS ruled that money is speech.
Cant have it both ways.
Initech
(109,764 posts)3. Can't we just arrest and prosecute him instead? Nothing of value would be lost!
BoRaGard
(7,598 posts)4. every GOPer accusation is an admission
Homan is shoveling a shipload of bullshit
mopinko
(74,294 posts)9. gmta. exactly what i was gonna say.
Red Mountain
(2,402 posts)5. How about financial supporters of pedophiles?
hildegaard28
(792 posts)6. Even if
What he is saying is true, and it's not, I'm pretty sure there's no law against paying people to protest. How will his imaginary payers be prosecuted? What law have they broken?
Autumn
(49,059 posts)7. I'm a financial backer. When I go to a protest I have to buy gas for my car
to get there. I make protest signs and buy lunch. Does that count?
Hotler
(13,747 posts)8. When we take power again and, we will, your ass is going to prison. nt
yellow dahlia
(6,998 posts)10. Weapons being used?
I have not heard one incident of violent protestors, or weapons being used.
I often make sarcastic remarks at protests:
"Gee that George Soros really makes some creative signs."
or
"I haven't gotten reimbursed, from George Soros, for my poster board and markers yet."