Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chicagogrl1

(630 posts)
Mon Sep 8, 2025, 03:37 PM Sep 2025

I am disgusted with JP Morgan Chase

Recent story in Yahoo details how Chase knew Epstein was a POS but loved his money more, and allowed him to continue to do business. Special rules for special people. I hope to God that Jamie Dimon loses his f’ing job. Can’t help but wonder if this will affect Chase’s bottom line.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chase-bank-executives-aided-epstein-173745401.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LetMyPeopleVote

(176,826 posts)
2. J.P. Morgan has paid out a combined $365 million to settle Epstein victims lawsuits
Mon Sep 8, 2025, 03:51 PM
Sep 2025

You do not pay out that much unless you did something wrong




otchmoson

(300 posts)
3. You beat me to it. I was ready to begin a discussion with this . . .
Mon Sep 8, 2025, 03:55 PM
Sep 2025

And now, Jamie Dimon and J.P. Morgan Chase . . .
Pick one or more:
 Inept bank with broken guardrails
 Enabler who saw nothing, heard nothing
 Client
 Business associate
 Business partner

tonkatoy8888

(183 posts)
5. Disgusted with JP Morgan Chase
Mon Sep 8, 2025, 04:17 PM
Sep 2025

Call me an absolutist but I'm pretty much disgusted with most large corporations.

We have decided, in this country, that sociopaths are the absolute best people to head businesses. We have also decided, in this country, that it is beyond us to regulate businesses.

So, we have a perfect storm. We have C-Suites made up of people who lie and steal like they breathe and a regulatory system that is the equivalent of a battered spouse.

As consumers and end users of these corporation's products and services we are hosed at every turn. Shitty, slipshod products, corporate employees straight up lying, hidden fees, not keeping their end of the bargain, it goes on every day in every way.

So yeah, why wouldn't JP Morgan Chase not do business with and facilitate the crimes of Epstein?

God almighty, there was money to be made, and we all know that's what is important.

Torchlight

(6,521 posts)
7. Our markets priooritize profit over ethics.
Mon Sep 8, 2025, 04:56 PM
Sep 2025

I hold no illusions that given a ledger, an opportunity, and a way out if needed, any investment firm in the U.S. would turn a blind eye, nod, wink, and close the deal.

Clouds Passing

(7,511 posts)
8. jpmorgan is a scourge on this country and the world. The damage he and his cohorts have done
Mon Sep 8, 2025, 05:03 PM
Sep 2025

set humanity backwards a hundred+ years.

LetMyPeopleVote

(176,826 posts)
9. New York Times-How JPMorgan Enabled the Crimes of Jeffrey Epstein
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 10:39 AM
Sep 2025

This article was discussed on MSNBC a couple times last night. JP Morgan knew that Epstein was a criminal and did NOT debank him. This is a very long article but is very interesting. Here is a gift link to this story.

Good NYTimes reporting. But it's still unclear where Epstein's fortune came from. Way down in the story, it asks, "Where was all this money coming from?" More reporting needed.
Gift link:
How JPMorgan Enabled the Crimes of Jeffrey Epstein
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/08/m...

Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis (@jeffjarvis.bsky.social) 2025-09-08T11:03:50.321Z


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/08/magazine/jeffrey-epstein-jp-morgan.html?unlocked_article_code=1.kU8.1Ics.RXCxhuvzZ9gL&smid=tw-share

JPMorgan, however, was all in. Soon it opened accounts not just for Epstein but also for his companies, including one that handled the affairs of his private island, Little Saint James, off the coast of St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The bank also provided financial backing for Epstein to help Jean-Luc Brunel, a French modeling scout who had been the subject of media reports about drugging and raping women, start a modeling agency called MC2. JPMorgan would ultimately open at least 134 accounts for Epstein, his companies and his associates.

Wittingly or not, the bank was supporting important cogs in Epstein’s sex-trafficking machinery. On the island, Epstein would compel teenage girls and young women to give him nude massages and have sex with him. Some of Epstein’s underage victims said MC2 lured them to the United States with the prospect of paid modeling work. (In 2022, Brunel died by suicide in a French jail cell after being charged with raping teenage girls.)

The millions of dollars in fees that Epstein was paying the bank was only part of his allure. Arguably more important, he was identifying potential new clients and business opportunities. In 2003, for example, he introduced Staley to Brin, the co-founder of Google and one of the world’s richest men. Brin hired JPMorgan to help manage his immense fortune — he would eventually park more than $4 billion in assets at the bank — a decision that Staley credited to Epstein. Staley later said in a deposition that a parade of other Epstein referrals — including to Gates, Elon Musk and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, an Emirati billionaire — followed, though not all became clients.....

Decades of scandals — in which banks facilitated drug smuggling, human trafficking, money laundering, terrorism and even genocide — gave rise to requirements that lenders vet their customers, closely monitor their activities and flag suspicious transactions to the government. Among its many lapses with Epstein, JPMorgan often failed to alert federal watchdogs to transactions that the bank later acknowledged were suspicious. And by opening accounts for young women without meeting them, the bank was missing a well-known hallmark of human traffickers: that they control victims’ interactions with the outside world.

Not until Epstein was arrested and indicted in July 2006 on charges of soliciting prostitution from a teenage girl did JPMorgan start paying more attention. In a deposition in 2023, Staley said that he phoned Dimon to tell him an important client had just been indicted and that the two executives later met in person to discuss the situation. (Dimon has denied this under oath.) “So painful to read,” Mary Erdoes, who had succeeded Staley at the helm of the private bank, emailed her boss, attaching an article about the indictment. Staley responded that he had just met with Epstein the previous night. “I’ve never seen him so shaken,” he typed on his BlackBerry, saying that Epstein “adamantly denies” being involved with girls......

The fallout for JPMorgan has been limited. In 2023, it paid $290 million to settle a lawsuit brought by roughly 200 of Epstein’s victims and an additional $75 million to resolve related litigation brought by the U.S. Virgin Islands, where many of Epstein’s crimes took place. The payments were a rounding error for a company that raked in more than $50 billion in profits that year. (The bank didn’t admit wrongdoing and is trying to force its insurers to cover some of the litigation costs.) No regulator took action against JPMorgan. No executives lost their jobs. Dimon remains one of the most powerful bankers in the world.


Here is an alternative free link to the story

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am disgusted with JP Mo...