General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am disgusted with JP Morgan Chase
Recent story in Yahoo details how Chase knew Epstein was a POS but loved his money more, and allowed him to continue to do business. Special rules for special people. I hope to God that Jamie Dimon loses his fing job. Cant help but wonder if this will affect Chases bottom line.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chase-bank-executives-aided-epstein-173745401.html
RockRaven
(18,958 posts)sued over it.
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,828 posts)otchmoson
(300 posts)And now, Jamie Dimon and J.P. Morgan Chase . . .
Pick one or more:
Inept bank with broken guardrails
Enabler who saw nothing, heard nothing
Client
Business associate
Business partner
Chicagogrl1
(630 posts)tonkatoy8888
(183 posts)Call me an absolutist but I'm pretty much disgusted with most large corporations.
We have decided, in this country, that sociopaths are the absolute best people to head businesses. We have also decided, in this country, that it is beyond us to regulate businesses.
So, we have a perfect storm. We have C-Suites made up of people who lie and steal like they breathe and a regulatory system that is the equivalent of a battered spouse.
As consumers and end users of these corporation's products and services we are hosed at every turn. Shitty, slipshod products, corporate employees straight up lying, hidden fees, not keeping their end of the bargain, it goes on every day in every way.
So yeah, why wouldn't JP Morgan Chase not do business with and facilitate the crimes of Epstein?
God almighty, there was money to be made, and we all know that's what is important.
bamagal62
(4,406 posts)To this day, he has never been arrested.
Torchlight
(6,521 posts)I hold no illusions that given a ledger, an opportunity, and a way out if needed, any investment firm in the U.S. would turn a blind eye, nod, wink, and close the deal.
Clouds Passing
(7,512 posts)set humanity backwards a hundred+ years.
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,828 posts)This article was discussed on MSNBC a couple times last night. JP Morgan knew that Epstein was a criminal and did NOT debank him. This is a very long article but is very interesting. Here is a gift link to this story.
Good NYTimes reporting. But it's still unclear where Epstein's fortune came from. Way down in the story, it asks, "Where was all this money coming from?" More reporting needed.
— Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis (@jeffjarvis.bsky.social) 2025-09-08T11:03:50.321Z
Gift link:
How JPMorgan Enabled the Crimes of Jeffrey Epstein
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/08/m...
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/08/magazine/jeffrey-epstein-jp-morgan.html?unlocked_article_code=1.kU8.1Ics.RXCxhuvzZ9gL&smid=tw-share
Wittingly or not, the bank was supporting important cogs in Epsteins sex-trafficking machinery. On the island, Epstein would compel teenage girls and young women to give him nude massages and have sex with him. Some of Epsteins underage victims said MC2 lured them to the United States with the prospect of paid modeling work. (In 2022, Brunel died by suicide in a French jail cell after being charged with raping teenage girls.)
The millions of dollars in fees that Epstein was paying the bank was only part of his allure. Arguably more important, he was identifying potential new clients and business opportunities. In 2003, for example, he introduced Staley to Brin, the co-founder of Google and one of the worlds richest men. Brin hired JPMorgan to help manage his immense fortune he would eventually park more than $4 billion in assets at the bank a decision that Staley credited to Epstein. Staley later said in a deposition that a parade of other Epstein referrals including to Gates, Elon Musk and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, an Emirati billionaire followed, though not all became clients.....
Decades of scandals in which banks facilitated drug smuggling, human trafficking, money laundering, terrorism and even genocide gave rise to requirements that lenders vet their customers, closely monitor their activities and flag suspicious transactions to the government. Among its many lapses with Epstein, JPMorgan often failed to alert federal watchdogs to transactions that the bank later acknowledged were suspicious. And by opening accounts for young women without meeting them, the bank was missing a well-known hallmark of human traffickers: that they control victims interactions with the outside world.
Not until Epstein was arrested and indicted in July 2006 on charges of soliciting prostitution from a teenage girl did JPMorgan start paying more attention. In a deposition in 2023, Staley said that he phoned Dimon to tell him an important client had just been indicted and that the two executives later met in person to discuss the situation. (Dimon has denied this under oath.) So painful to read, Mary Erdoes, who had succeeded Staley at the helm of the private bank, emailed her boss, attaching an article about the indictment. Staley responded that he had just met with Epstein the previous night. Ive never seen him so shaken, he typed on his BlackBerry, saying that Epstein adamantly denies being involved with girls......
The fallout for JPMorgan has been limited. In 2023, it paid $290 million to settle a lawsuit brought by roughly 200 of Epsteins victims and an additional $75 million to resolve related litigation brought by the U.S. Virgin Islands, where many of Epsteins crimes took place. The payments were a rounding error for a company that raked in more than $50 billion in profits that year. (The bank didnt admit wrongdoing and is trying to force its insurers to cover some of the litigation costs.) No regulator took action against JPMorgan. No executives lost their jobs. Dimon remains one of the most powerful bankers in the world.
Here is an alternative free link to the story
Link to tweet


