The Supreme Court Just Gave the OK to Racial Profiling

[B.See]

The Supreme Court Just Gave the OK to Racial Profiling - The Nation via MSN

(because the original source appears to be paywalled)

On Monday morning, the Supreme Court allowed ICE to resume racially profiling all Latinos in Los Angeles under the suspicion that they might be “illegal” immigrants. The order is technically temporary, allowing racial profiling to happen only until the court reviews the full record, but the Republican justices made it incredibly clear that, whenever the court gets around to voting on the merits of the case, they will still be in favor of racial profiling.

The vote was, predictably, 6-3, along party lines, with alleged attempted rapist Brett Kavanaugh as the only justice in the Republican majority who bothered to explain his racist excuse for reasoning.

So, if you were a minority who voted for this racist POS, welcome to 'finding out'...

again.

[LetMyPeopleVote]

1. Deadline: Legal Blog--Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for 'roving patrols'

Democratic appointees in dissent said the move is “unconscionably irreconcilable with our Nation’s constitutional guarantees.”

Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for ‘roving patrols’ Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for ‘roving patrols’ www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...

— 7Veritas4 (@justjonz.bsky.social) 2025-09-08T16:15:43.571Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-los-angeles-roving-patrols-emergency-relief-trump-rcna224611

The Supreme Court’s Republican-appointed majority has granted the Trump administration’s emergency request to lift an order that temporarily restrained the government’s “roving patrols” in Los Angeles. A California judge had ruled that plaintiffs who sued the government, including U.S. citizens, would likely succeed in their claim that officials are conducting such patrols without reasonable suspicion.

The high court’s three Democratic appointees dissented from the unexplained majority order Monday, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor writing for the trio that the Fourth Amendment’s historical protections from arbitrary government interference “may no longer be true for those who happen to look a certain way, speak a certain way, and appear to work a certain type of legitimate job that pays very little.” She called the majority’s move “unconscionably irreconcilable with our Nation’s constitutional guarantees.”.....

Opposing emergency high court relief, the plaintiffs countered that the judge’s order “broke no new legal ground,” writing that it “does not prevent the government from enforcing the immigration laws, conducting consensual encounters, or relying on any or all of the four factors along with other facts to form reasonable suspicion.”

[B.See]

2. aka Straight up Nazi s**t.

Next, MORE concentration camps... and beyond.