"No Kings" is too mild

[Charmin One]

Some kings haven’t been as bad as Trump. It should be “No Dictators”, or better yet, “No Despots”.

[gab13by13]

1. No Fucking Kings.

[Redleg]

7. Yes to that

It is my preferred expression. Vulgar yes, but needed for the moment.

[BigmanPigman]

2. My NO KINGS poster was 2 sided

and on the one side I have tRump with a Hitler hair--don't and mustache and a big red clown nose.

It says
No Kings
No Fascists
No Clowns
No Crazies

[DJ Synikus Makisimus]

3. Deport Trump to Mars. On SpaceX.

And make Musk pay for it.

[J_William_Ryan]

4. '"No Kings" is too mild'

It’s also pointless, whatever it’s called.

[MrWowWow]

5. tr💩mp seeks to be a DICKtator!

Time to change the resistance slogan to:

No DICKtators!

[yellow dahlia]

6. Agreed! I have been saying the same thing.

No more cutesie slogans.

This is a take over, people!
This is an Authoritarian take over, people!

This is not about abstracts -
This is about the Constitution.
This is about the Rule of Law.

It has now progressed beyond Oligarchy. And people thought Oilgarchy was too big of a word.

A little civics and a little history are warranted here.

[a kennedy]

8. No, just something simple, hmmmmm. FAWK tRump!!!!!! THE LIAR, THE RAPIST, THE FAKE, THE PIECE OF SHIT.

[The Wizard]

9. No Scumbags

[hatrack]

10. I prefer "Fuck Trump" - simple and direct . . . .

But of course, it's not just him. The overall infection is characterized by multiple pustules.

[LudwigPastorius]

11. "'No Kings' is too mild"

It's all in how you frame that message.

[Fichefinder]

12. ICEBREAKERS

[canetoad]

13. I agree

The current crop of repubs make every current king I can think of look like benevolent father-figures. The king thing (and actually the gripe should have been with parliament) was a couple of centuries ago. Definitely not practical for today.

[msfiddlestix]

14. Agree, ajways felt it just was like milk toast. No psychotic despots works for me. 😆

[struggle4progress]

15. "Remember King Charles the Headless!"