Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Silent Type

(12,412 posts)
1. By 1:00 PM trump's admin claim that most of the months were during Biden's admin. Will be interesting to see a
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 11:42 AM
Sep 2025

breakdown of revisions by month.

Wiz Imp

(10,428 posts)
2. BLS doesn't calculate these revisions by month.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:41 PM
Sep 2025

The benchmark process replaces March data with the QCEW data and then wedges the difference back through the previous April.

 

Silent Type

(12,412 posts)
3. Surely some economist can "guess" at what months revisions were likely to have happened.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:46 PM
Sep 2025

Wiz Imp

(10,428 posts)
4. It's complicated.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 01:19 PM
Sep 2025

You can compare the QCEW data for each month to the CES data for that month but BLS doesn't replace the CES data with QCEW data for any month other than March and in fact would caution that this comparison would be misleading. And that doesn't even factor in the impact of seasonal adjustment. QCEW data is not seasonally adjusted, CES is.

But I did the comparison anyway and 90% of QCEW/CES difference from March was already in place in January 2025. I will note, however that the gap between the CES & QCEW data spiked significantly in December 2024 and continued to grow through March.

Note that last year, the initial estimated revision for March 2024 was 818,000, but the final revision was just 589,000.

Also note that the divergence of the 2 programs spiking in December 2024 and and growing each month after that makes some sense. Since Trump was elected in November, it should not be a surprise that job growth could sharply decline immediately following that, particularly with his promise of job killing tariffs.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»911,000 Fewer Jobs in Pas...