Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hay rick

(9,467 posts)
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 11:50 AM Sep 2025

Fashion guidance from the Supreme Court.

Last edited Thu Sep 11, 2025, 06:05 PM - Edit history (1)



Make that fascism guidance.

Using the shadow docket, the Supreme Court set aside a restraining order preventing ICE officers in Los Angeles from violating Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. ICE agents can continue to decide which people to stop and detain for questioning based solely on one or more of four factors that a lower-court judge had deemed unconstitutional.

Those factors are a person's apparent race or ethnicity; the fact that they speak English with an accent or speak Spanish; their presence at certain locations like farms, construction sites, or pickup sites for day laborers; and the type of work they do. Racial profiling is alive and well.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fashion guidance from the Supreme Court. (Original Post) hay rick Sep 2025 OP
Repugs--the masked bandits riversedge Sep 2025 #1
I wonder mercuryblues Sep 2025 #2
Also FASCISM guidance. n/t Martin Eden Sep 2025 #3
Supreme Court guidance Ray Bruns Sep 2025 #4
They are a waste of robes Mblaze Sep 2025 #5
SIX of them are, yes. ShazzieB Sep 2025 #9
Theoretically, this applies to white people Dr. T Sep 2025 #6
Are those ICE agents behind the masks? You betcha. twodogsbarking Sep 2025 #7
Move those masks up about 4 inches. Monkeys No See. Monkeys Do Tell. erronis Sep 2025 #8
The Black guy in a white hood pwb Sep 2025 #10
What was the picture? All I see is a blue square that says... littlemissmartypants Sep 2025 #11
Curious. hay rick Sep 2025 #12

ShazzieB

(22,347 posts)
9. SIX of them are, yes.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 02:01 PM
Sep 2025

We must not forget the three women who are valiantly fighting these battles, despite being outnumbered 2 to 1.

I know that everyone here is aware of the situation, but I don't think it hurts to point out what the reality is every now and then.

Dr. T

(552 posts)
6. Theoretically, this applies to white people
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 01:23 PM
Sep 2025

with three green teeth, neck beards, wife beater shirts and red baseball caps. Looks suspicious to me. He probably immigrated from Neanderthal times.

pwb

(12,552 posts)
10. The Black guy in a white hood
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 02:10 PM
Sep 2025

is sad vision. What about all those White Russian mafia and the Chinese mafia? Can you see our fat out of shape ICE officers confronting them? How many of these ICE goons have been shot or wounded? Zero. Yet they still dress like they are in a war zone. Talk about fake hoaxes eh?

littlemissmartypants

(32,806 posts)
11. What was the picture? All I see is a blue square that says...
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 02:52 PM
Sep 2025

postimage
free image hosting
Upgrade to Premium!
Want to embed images in emails?

hay rick

(9,467 posts)
12. Curious.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 05:50 PM
Sep 2025

I occasionally get that notice with postimage files and assume that the image is therefore not visible to anyone. In this case I am still able to view the image. You might try refreshing the post. If that doesn't work...the image is a cartoonized version of the justices posing for a formal picture in their robes. The six Republican justices are also wearing dark gaiter masks. the caption is "When you can't wear your white hoods after Labor Day."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fashion guidance from the...