Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
AI Darwin Awards launch to celebrate spectacularly bad deployments
Richard SpeedIt was bound to happen. The Darwin Awards are being extended to include examples of misadventures involving overzealous applications of AI.
Nominations are open for the 2025 AI Darwin Awards and the list of contenders is growing, fueled by a tech world weary of AI and evangelists eager to shove it somewhere inappropriate.
There's the Taco Bell drive-thru incident, where the chain catastrophically overestimated AI's ability to understand customer orders.
Or the Replit moment, where a spot of vibe coding nuked a production database, despite instructions from the user not to fiddle with code without permission.
Then there's the woeful security surrounding an AI chatbot used to screen applicants at McDonald's, where feeding in a password of 123456 gave access to the details of 64 million job applicants.
The Darwin Awards have traditionally been handed out (in a virtual sense) to individuals who have managed to remove themselves from the gene pool as a result of their own stupidity. The AI Darwin Awards, instead, are a collection of cautionary tales where an ill-conceived application of AI resulted in disaster.
The awards are not about poking fun at AI itself, but the consequences of its application without due care and attention.
Nominations are open for the 2025 AI Darwin Awards and the list of contenders is growing, fueled by a tech world weary of AI and evangelists eager to shove it somewhere inappropriate.
There's the Taco Bell drive-thru incident, where the chain catastrophically overestimated AI's ability to understand customer orders.
Or the Replit moment, where a spot of vibe coding nuked a production database, despite instructions from the user not to fiddle with code without permission.
Then there's the woeful security surrounding an AI chatbot used to screen applicants at McDonald's, where feeding in a password of 123456 gave access to the details of 64 million job applicants.
The Darwin Awards have traditionally been handed out (in a virtual sense) to individuals who have managed to remove themselves from the gene pool as a result of their own stupidity. The AI Darwin Awards, instead, are a collection of cautionary tales where an ill-conceived application of AI resulted in disaster.
The awards are not about poking fun at AI itself, but the consequences of its application without due care and attention.
https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/09/ai_darwin_awards/?td=rt-3a]