Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(95,261 posts)
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 11:12 AM Sep 2025

Harris says leaving reelection decision to Biden was 'recklessness,' but she defends his abilities

https://apnews.com/article/harris-book-excerpt-biden-473ca75fb9fb5fa157a788bcf3ecc941

Harris says leaving reelection decision to Biden was ‘recklessness,’ but she defends his abilities
By MICHELLE L. PRICE
Updated 7:34 AM CDT, September 10, 2025

WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Vice President Kamala Harris says it was “recklessness” for Democrats to leave it to President Joe Biden to decide whether to continue seeking another term last year, but she defends his ability to do the job, according an excerpt of her new book.

Harris, in an excerpt of “107 Days” published Wednesday in The Atlantic, writes that as questions swirled about whether the then-81-year-old Biden should seek reelection, she and others left the decision to him and first lady Jill Biden.

“Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness,” Harris said.

The remarks are the first time Harris has been publicly critical of Biden’s decision to run again — an ill-fated decision that saw him drop out in July 2024 after a disastrous debate performance, leaving her to head up the Democratic ticket and ultimately lose to Republican Donald Trump.

“The stakes were simply too high,” Harris writes in the book. “This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision.”

Biden’s office did not immediately have a comment Wednesday.

...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Biden also got very bad advice from his advisors who severely underestimated Trump's thirst for power and naively assumed Republicans were decent law-abiding citizens.



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

newdeal2

(5,604 posts)
2. I'm sorry but there's no committee vote on this kind of thing
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 11:19 AM
Sep 2025

Friends and family can give their advice. But ultimately it’s the President’s decision to seek reelection or not.

And there’s always a primary for challengers.

unblock

(56,262 posts)
3. Kinda weird take on events
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 11:25 AM
Sep 2025

I'm quite sure Biden felt railroaded by a heavily biased media that deemed normal senior aging in an otherwise fit and capable leader as a major crisis of mental decline, while ignoring a nearly same-aged textbook case of numerous mental deficiencies. Combine that with a series of prominent democrats doubting his ability to win and I really doubt he felt he had much choice.

That said, at the end of the day, you can't force anyone into any job. It's always a candidate's decision to run or not. No committee can force them to run if they've decided not to, for whatever reason.

Melon

(1,694 posts)
4. They could have pulled his ability to run earlier
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 11:31 AM
Sep 2025

You are saying they can't force him to run. They could have removed him from the ballet not to run.
When the decline in his abilities became very noticeable, the party should have taken a decision quickly not to have him run. The delays in pulling out cost the party. Even after the debate it took too long based on his own decision.

FBaggins

(28,763 posts)
5. Except she's talking about the post-debate-debacle decisions
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 11:36 AM
Sep 2025

Her comment smacks of anti-democratic values. She had no option re: whether to leave the decision to him or not at that point.

She could have primaried him much earlier…
But she would have lost

unblock

(56,262 posts)
6. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the point
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 11:47 AM
Sep 2025

Is she saying they should have taken him off the ticket sooner, or that they should have insisted he stay on the ticket? I guess I'm no longer clear on this point.

Anyway I think the real problem is the media, and perhaps thry should have presented a united front backing Biden and ripped into the media as being in the tank for Donnie, giving him far to much airtime, and a ludicrous amount of legitimacy given that he's the most thoroughly documented liar in history, never mind all the incompetence and evil.

Biden at 50% is still 100 times as better than Donnie. Dumb as rocks on a good day and evil on all of them.

bigtree

(94,672 posts)
7. I reject this top-down reasoning that assumes they know better than voters
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 11:47 AM
Sep 2025

...or that elections are just a matter of elitist politicians arranging the deck chairs for Dem voters to sit down and applaud the wisdom of a handful of political operatives.

I don't think I'm exaggerating when I say that it's the very same top down process she's wistful about which edged her and others out of the nomination in favor of the aging veteran pol.

Response to dalton99a (Original post)

ImNotGod

(1,216 posts)
10. Kamala is right. President Biden was a great president but running for a second term was a bridge too far
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 12:41 PM
Sep 2025

When he announced his second run my heart sunk, i thought he planned to pass the torch. I backed him, kept my doubts to myself. We also need to learn from our mistakes as a party which is another reason I'm not going to dis her book. We can't focus on this, move on, maybe write a book about how to fight fascism like we mean it.

Johonny

(26,604 posts)
11. They didnt leave it up to him
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 12:52 PM
Sep 2025

She could have or Newsome or anyone that might have wanted too, run against him in the primaries. The voters of her party chose him. One could argue, they didn't give primary voters anyone else to consider. That's how these fucking things work.

The lesson from LBJ is, don't have your incumbant candidate drop out of the fucking race. This would appear to be a good lesson to learn this time again. Shit, Biden might have loss, but that late in the stage, no one else was going to win. Despite just looked like weak fools punking him due to media pressure. They still look like weak fools over this.

madibella

(208 posts)
12. Ah, back to being ungrateful I see.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 01:01 PM
Sep 2025

She tried some shit at a debate once too. Blindsided Biden and he still picked her for VP. Oh and she failed to secure the nomination in 2020 even with her stunt.

I’m seeing stark character differences.

Democrats never learn. What a turnoff.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Harris says leaving reele...