General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInteresting speculation: Loomer labelled Kirk a traitor over his criticism of Trump on Epstein
Maybe this is a MAGA assassin, pissed off at Kirk's criticism of tRUmp?
I'm not buying the "alleged mistress" bit - seems too out there for a man in such poor health.
Link to tweet
still-prayin4rain
(525 posts)yourout
(8,872 posts)Not saying we don't have a couple of wackos on the left but the vast vast vast majority of them are on the right.
rickford66
(6,094 posts)SergeStorms
(20,807 posts)looking for a single post that seems "librul" and run with it like a starving dog with a rib roast. Guaranteed.
PJMcK
(25,126 posts)eating one anothers faces?
EYESORE 9001
(29,882 posts)is that his murder was a message to the RW blogosphere that any dissent whatsoever will be met with violence.
remo ymor
(1,039 posts)Big message to thr right..."Don't disagree with Trump or this is what you get "
EYESORE 9001
(29,882 posts)Havent heard any voices on the right calling for release of the Epstein files today.
PatSeg
(53,540 posts)but it looks like that is a distinct possibility. It came across as very professional.
EYESORE 9001
(29,882 posts)Despite the early formulation of my opinion, it still stands to reason that - to me, anyway - the biggest beneficiary of this assassination is none other than the orange menace.
PatSeg
(53,540 posts)brought down if the Epstein files were to be released. I think there are a lot of powerful people who stand to lose a whole lot if their names are revealed in the files.
EYESORE 9001
(29,882 posts)where means, motive & opportunity are concerned? Im thinking its the guy with a federal law enforcement agency at his disposal, whose minion is presently sowing seeds of confusion and misdirection.
PatSeg
(53,540 posts)He has the experience, expertise, and resources for such an assassination.
tblue37
(68,449 posts)EYESORE 9001
(29,882 posts)And obvious
CanonRay
(16,262 posts)At the least it would change the velocity of the round, and possibly the trajectory making it useless for long range shooting. Seems absurd to me.
jmbar2
(8,171 posts)yellow dahlia
(6,449 posts)The grifter makes examples of dissenters, as a warning to everyone else. Egs: colleges, law firms, etc.
Kirk started thinking contrary to the accepted narrative around Epstein.
C_U_L8R
(49,522 posts)It seems the odds make that a real possibility.
AverageOldGuy
(4,160 posts)How did Trump get out his announcement and his flags at half staff order so soon?
Who are the guys shown on video close to Kirk facing the shooter and giving hand signals?
How did the shooter get a hunting rifle through a college building onto the roof?
haele
(15,593 posts)1. *rump was told by staffers Kirk was dead before the announcement was made. I unfortunately saw the closer video, Kirk was obviously mortally wounded. Of course, there might have been some people in the administration (Miller, Hegseth, Bondi, Patel...) who were expecting this event, and had the script ready to put in front of *rump.
2. Hand signals could be gang signs. Idiot supporters might have been flashing White Power signs every time a Conservative Point was "scored".
3. Open carry on campus, and in some states, deer season started last week. No one probably thought twice about a student with a long gun on campus, especially if they saw that student in the athletic area or near any parking that easily accessed off campus.
Also, was there a shooting club on campus?
Some campuses that have a ROTC have an armory and shooting range on campus for training.
Sequoia
(12,772 posts)All the people milling about and sniper shoots him square in the neck.
people
(847 posts)Feel Good Inc
(66 posts)1. Kirk has close connections with Trump and his administration. He was probably in contact with those there - or someone in his stratosphere was as well. Think of that episode of West Wing where Leo dies - and how quickly it gets back to Bartlet. The reality is that Kirk likely was dead instantly, or close to it. Trump was probably notified maybe even minutes after it happened and that it did not look good. Plenty of other right-wingers on Twitter also seemed to have connections and were talking about his condition. Also, Trump wasn't the first to break the news. The Utah Speaker of the House broke the news at around 2:00 Utah time saying he was dead. That was 30 or so minutes before Trump announced it. He likely waited until the family was notified - or maybe even talked to the family. But it wasn't that soon - Trump didn't announce it until over an hour or two after the shooting.
He got flags ordered at half-staff because he's the president and literally just saying it likely can force it happening.
2. Could be his security and just random movements that unfortunately happened at the wrong time. When you're free, set up a camera and film yourself. Once you "forget" the camera is on you, you'd be surprised at how fidgety or twitchy you are - whether it's touching your nose, scratching an eye, rubbing your forehead...all things that could look like signals but just random actions you're making without realizing it...especially if you're just standing there doing nothing.
3. Guns can be taken apart rather easily, especially specific rifles. He likely had it concealed in a backpack and then after the shooting maybe hid it under a blanket he also had in his backpack as he got away in the ensuing chaos.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)That frenzy had ramped up in the past few months according to rightwing/Nazi watchers.
malaise
(297,921 posts)Celerity
(54,862 posts)SergeStorms
(20,807 posts)How's that "trust" working out for you, Charlie?
Attilatheblond
(9,223 posts)Celerity
(54,862 posts)https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220484465
Charlie Kirk says he doesn't want to talk about Jeffrey Epstein anymore, pivoting to "We have tons of announcements happening when it comes to NATO..."
— Matt Novak (@paleofuture.bsky.social) 2025-07-14T19:00:13.414Z
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220484465#post10

Attilatheblond
(9,223 posts)Sometimes I have to do chores around the house
Celerity
(54,862 posts)SergeStorms
(20,807 posts)Just like the right's "Clinton death list" supposedly did in the 90s. 😁
kimbutgar
(27,555 posts)sop
(19,287 posts)Not many on the left focus on all the rightwing social media influencers, there are just too many of them to worry about. It's mostly rightwing extremists who take Kirk seriously, then waste countless hours arguing amongst themselves as to which one is the most ideologically pure, and which one deserves to be killed for rightwing apostasy.
Emile
(43,245 posts)Proud to say that before yesterday I had never heard of him! My brain can only take so much!
sir pball
(5,350 posts)Not that he didn't spew endless, vile garbage, but his brand was more edgelord than openly aggressive; he was even willing to (pretend) to debate
Now, someone like Nick Fuentes, who invented "your body my choice" and openly espouses violence and ethnic cleansing I would see being more of a target
"these violent delights have violent ends".
yellow dahlia
(6,449 posts)And now I ask the question - who does it benefit?
JT45242
(4,128 posts)95% it is likely the first.
5% chance someone he wronged (like a family member of a girl that he assaulted) was seeking revenge. This is a guy who exuded the no girl says no to me rapist vibe.
But I would bet it is a RWNJ upset over one of his opinions that is disloyal to neoNazis or mango mussolini
barbtries
(31,350 posts)it could literally be a hit set up by a jealous wife or a mentally ill person who was obsessed with him. we do not know.
angrychair
(12,501 posts)I am incredibly disappointed and frustrated that so many Democratic leaders immediately started framing this incident as "political violence" clearly implied was that it was a Democrat attacking a Republican.
That framing is both irresponsible and dangerous because:
1) NO SUSPECT
2) NO EVIDENCE
For all we know that could be a disgruntled father of an underage girl he has been repeatedly raping since she was 8.
See how I created a narrative out of thin air with zero evidence?
Even if you didn't believe its the truth, it's not, there is a small part of you that can't shake that feeling of anger that Kirk would do something like that. The psychology of being first to shape the narrative is literally the difference between peace and war.
That is my point.
What we don't need is a bunch of sycophantic posturing and bowing to the right because their favorite Nazi got himself killed because he molested little girls (see, you twitched a little reading that sentence).
The problem we face is the right has already started shaping their version of events and those on the left are only helping by using phrases like "political violence" to frame what happened with zero suspects and zero evidence.
That is dangerous and very irresponsible. They need to stop. Immediately.
Ponietz
(4,421 posts)Narratives without facts are delusions.
yellow dahlia
(6,449 posts)Too many unknowns and questions at this time.
But one thing that makes no sense is that the Dems or the radical left are to blame. First of all, someone on this forum said: what radical left?
The RW media and Nancy Mace are feeding an agenda and writing a narrative.
BoRaGard
(7,591 posts)barbtries
(31,350 posts)i mean administration, my money's on stephen miller to have set it up.
i didn't even know who he was until earlier this year. apparently the right wing and/or legacy media is behaving as if he was a much beloved head of state or something. that's quite weird.
Linda ladeewolf
(1,142 posts)Just like the assassination attempt last year. Get rid of the dissenters in his own party and shut them up.
Probably planned by the same person or persons. Just read about it and this is what came to mind.
yellow dahlia
(6,449 posts)Celerity
(54,862 posts)https://www.sas2025.com/
https://backend.tpusa.com/sasagenda/

On Monday, July 14th, 2025, after talking to Trump, he (on his show) backed off and said he was done talking about Epstein.
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/charlie-kirk-announces-hes-done-talking-about-epstein-after-trump-called-him/

Pro-Trump student organizer and MAGA influencer, Charlie Kirk, told his podcast audience on Monday that he was done talking about the so-called Epstein Files a day after President Donald Trump called him. Kirks organization, Turning Point USA, hosted its Student Action Summit in Florida over the weekend, which saw several speakers hammer the administration over its conclusion that the various conspiracy theories surrounding convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein are all false CNNs Kristen Holmes reported on Sunday night, President Trump called Charlie Kirk Saturday to express his support for Bondi after being shown a clip of Kirk seemingly supporting Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino over Bondi at Kirks Turning Point USA conference in FL.
Attorney General Pam Bondi has been on the receiving end of an avalanche of vitriol over her apparently contradictory statements on the Epstein case, which she has worked in recent days to clarify. Late last week, several reports revealed that Bongino is threatening to quit his role at the FBI unless Bondi is removed as attorney general, adding fuel to the fire engulfing the MAGA base.
The rhetoric at Turning Points summit got so heated, at one point, comedian Dave Smith received loud applause while accusing Trump of actively covering up a giant child rapist ring referring to Epstein. Kirk told his audience, Plenty was said this last weekend at our event about Epstein. Honestly, Im done talking about Epstein for the time being. Im gonna trust my friends in the administration, Im gonna trust my friends in the government to do what needs to be done, solve it, balls in their hands.
After briefly addressing some of the other news of the day, he added, But let me just say this again everyone knows my opinion about the Epstein thing, the messaging fumble. I would love to see the DOJ move to unseal the grand jury testimony. I think that would be a big win. I would love to see that. And Im gonna trust my friends Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, my friend Pam Bondi. All these guys, Todd Blanche, Im gonna trust them to solve it. Balls in their court. I think that there was plenty of, lets say, speeches that were directed towards this topic this last weekend. So we dont need to spend our valuable time on this program relitigating it, Kirk concluded.
snip
also see: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMGcTOyRWOk/
That is false, and as far as I am aware, after the Trump call, Kirk backed off the entire Epstein thing and has not pushed it since.
Hassler
(4,961 posts)And the remaining flunky FBI finds the suspect is that like all shooters, this one used a gun.
RockRaven
(19,749 posts)perhaps not coincidentally Fuentes has a similar target audience demographic as Kirk. Direct competition is a motive for that rhetoric, but "true believers" may not see that obvious aspect.
Mme. Defarge
(9,049 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.