Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steven A Smith's take on the Murder of Charlie Kirk (Original Post) hueymahl Sep 2025 OP
The guy Hornedfrog2000 Sep 2025 #1
Exactly.... democratsruletheday Sep 2025 #2
Stephen A doesn't care about Kirk's politics because he thinks he is safe from them. RockRaven Sep 2025 #3
"because his ideas and his beliefs differed from somebody else, apparently" - Stephen A Smith Abolishinist Sep 2025 #4
Who?? awesomerwb1 Sep 2025 #5

RockRaven

(18,957 posts)
3. Stephen A doesn't care about Kirk's politics because he thinks he is safe from them.
Thu Sep 11, 2025, 09:16 PM
Sep 2025

He thinks he is rich and famous enough not to get destroyed by the forces Kirk was moving, enabling, strengthening.

Otherwise, he would care about that.

Abolishinist

(2,911 posts)
4. "because his ideas and his beliefs differed from somebody else, apparently" - Stephen A Smith
Thu Sep 11, 2025, 09:21 PM
Sep 2025

Apparently not enough for YOU, Mr. Smith. And I agree 100% about this being a tragedy, not the point.

Charlie Kirk built himself into the face of a conservative youth movement through Turning Point USA (TPUSA). Behind the branding of “patriotism” and “freedom,” the record shows a pattern of rhetoric, organizational culture, and alliances that echoed white supremacist and Christian nationalist ideologies. The Southern Poverty Law Center documented how TPUSA repeatedly framed immigrants, LGBTQ+ people, and racial justice advocates as existential threats to “white Christian America,” warning followers that their families, religion, and entire way of life were under attack. In later years, Kirk openly embraced Christian nationalist language, claiming that liberty was only possible with a Christian population—a narrative tying freedom to demographic dominance, a cornerstone of supremacist logic (SPLC).

On race, Kirk was blunt and dismissive. He denied the existence of systemic racism, called white privilege a “racist idea,” and vilified critical race theory as dangerous indoctrination. In one speech, he called George Floyd a “scumbag,” showing open contempt for a man whose death triggered a national reckoning on race and policing (WHYY). These rhetorical choices were not accidental—they functioned as a political strategy to delegitimize Black pain and deny the realities of structural racism in America.

You have strange bedfellows, Mr. Smith.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Steven A Smith's take on ...